• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Biden Doubles Down: ‘We Are Going To Get Rid Of Fossil Fuels’

by Bronson Stocking
February 06, 2020, 9:20 AM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 2 mins read
A A
11

biden town hallNow that his son Hunter is no longer being paid all that money by Burisma Holdings, a Ukrainian gas company, former Vice President Joe Biden wants to ban fossil fuels.

At a campaign event in New Hampshire, the Democratic candidate responded to a group of climate protesters by assuring them that he too would phase out fossil fuels if elected president.

“These guys are okay,” Biden addressed a group of protesters that interrupted his speech. “They want to do the same thing I want to do. They want to phase out fossil fuels and we’re going to phase out fossil fuels.”

In September 2019, Biden made a similar assurance to another climate change activist at a rally in New Hampshire.

The activist asked the candidate, “How can we trust that you’re going to act on climate, on the climate crisis if you’re still attending fundraisers that fossil fuel executives like Andy Goldman are at?”

This was before the Democratic-led impeachment efforts raised public awareness about how much the Biden family made off of gas giant Burisma Holdings.

Biden’s proposal would cost an estimated 10.3 million American jobs, 25,000 of which would come out of New Hampshire, according to a tweet from GOP Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel.

However, Iowa caucusgoers did appear to support banning Joe Biden on Tuesday night.

The candidate is now sitting at fourth place in Iowa behind Vermont socialist Bernie Sanders and Mayor Pete Buttigieg — the mayor who helped take his city of South Bend, Indiana, from the 105th-highest violent crime rate all the way up to the coveted 27th spot.

Even pathological liar Elizabeth Warren beat the former vice president in Iowa on Tuesday night.

After stepping off a private jet in Des Moines, Elizabeth Warren cowered behind another person in an effort to prevent the cameras from catching her glaring hypocrisy on fossil fuel consumption.

Democrats use fossil fuels every day but want the rest of us to live life without them.

The New Hampshire Democratic primary will take place Tuesday, Feb. 11.

Read more at Townhall

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024
Energy

30-Plus Signs That The Climate Scam Is Collapsing

Apr 09, 2025

Comments 11

  1. Shoki Kaneda says:
    6 years ago

    Much better and easier to just get rid of Joe Biden. Fortunately, he’s doing great work toward that goal.

  2. Amber says:
    6 years ago

    Can a deplorable’s comment be far off ?
    Fire coal workers shut down fossil fuels
    get contracts from China for Hunter .

    The guy is toast .

  3. Amber says:
    6 years ago

    No Biden you are about to exit stage left . Say high to your new friend Durham on the way out .
    Have some warm cocoa and count leaves in your pool .

  4. Russell Johnson says:
    6 years ago

    I can’t stop ROFL!!!!! The biggest fossil running wants to ban fossil fuel! PERFECT!!

  5. Dave O says:
    6 years ago

    Good ‘ol Joe. Better to keep quiet and be thought an idiot, than open your mouth and dispel all doubt.

    • Sonnyhill says:
      6 years ago

      That donkey left the barn when Joe whispered loudly to Obama
      ”This is a big f***ing deal”.
      I believe that Obama deliberately chose Joe, the stupidest honky at hand.

  6. Spurwing Plover says:
    6 years ago

    Biden is a idiot he sounds and stupid as AOC and Sanders and the first thing we do is to cut off all of Bean Brain Biden’s heating fuel He a typical member of the Stupid Jackass Party all mouth and no mind and beyond all hope of ever recovering from his democrat stupidity

  7. Shoki Kaneda says:
    6 years ago

    An excellent example of a politician spouting nonsense to obtain power. Even someone as limited as Joe Biden understands that will not happen.

  8. Al Shelton says:
    6 years ago

    Biden has no hope of becoming POTUS IMO.
    He is a moron, and is foolishly thinking he can ride the non-existent AGW wave.

  9. Randy Verret says:
    6 years ago

    You CAN phase out fossil fuels. The timeline will, most likely, take up the rest of the 21st Century to find a suitable replacement. Right now, fossil fuels provide 80% of our primary energy, meaning transportation, industrial heat, consumer goods, electricity generation & residential/commercial heating/AC, etc. You can verify those numbers on the Energy Information Admin. (EIA) website, an affiliate of the U.S. Dept. of Energy. Despite all the technological advancements since 1950, oil, gas & coals share of U.S primary energy has dropped (only) about 5%. Right now, you do not have a clean, scalable & sustainable alternative sitting on the “shelf” that meets the requisite energy imperatives of cost, density & scale. Continued VILIFICATION of energy PROVIDERS poses no solution to the energy transition challenge. I suppose I am both baffled & gravely disappointed by the total LACK of any knowledge of the energy system as espoused by these various Democratic candidates. You are not going to transform the entire U.S energy system overnite, regardless of what the Environmental NGO propaganda continues to spew out. They offer no constructive SOLUTIONS to the challenge, other than their outright contempt for fossil fuels. Somehow, this discussion needs to drastically change. Policy prescriptions like the Green New Deal promote one thing…energy POVERTY. Folks need to start educating themselves on these complex issues & trade-offs. In energy, there is no EASY BUTTON…

    • Steve Bunten says:
      6 years ago

      Unfortunately it’s not just clueless politicians but there are also so-called scientists and engineers, all of whom should know better, espouse the same nonsense. It is from these people that the politicians get their (mis)information.

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • money pile‘The Week’ Claims Climate Change Cut U.S. Wages, Real Data Says Otherwise
    Feb 12, 2026
    Official wage data show U.S. paychecks rising during recent mild warming, contradicting claims that climate change has cut incomes. […]
  • newsomSupreme Court Deals Crushing Blow To California’s EV Mandate
    Feb 11, 2026
    Supreme Court ruling opens the door to legal challenges against California’s 2035 electric vehicle mandate. […]
  • EPA headquartersRepealing The Endangerment Finding Shows CO2 Was Never An ‘Existential Threat’
    Feb 11, 2026
    Repealing the EPA’s endangerment finding weakens the case for more climate spending and exposes the shaky foundation behind carbon regulation. […]
  • clouds sun hotHow A Scientific Myth Undergirds The Greenhouse Gas Theory
    Feb 11, 2026
    A closer look at the 19th-century experiment behind modern greenhouse theory—and why its findings don’t hold up today. […]
  • lee zeldin capitalEPA Rescinding The Endangerment Finding Hinges On Repealing Supreme Court Precedent
    Feb 11, 2026
    EPA’s repeal of the endangerment finding may fail in court unless the Supreme Court overturns Massachusetts v. EPA. […]
  • model v actual worldWhy Climate Science Is Not Settled
    Feb 10, 2026
    Climate models, extreme weather claims, and CO2 assumptions don’t hold up when tested against real-world data. […]
  • endangerment finding shredderHow The EPA’s Endangerment Finding Was Pre-Cooked
    Feb 10, 2026
    How a already decided EPA ruling became the legal backbone of U.S. climate policy—and why its scientific foundation is now coming apart. […]
  • bald eagles nestObama-Funded Wind Turbine Kills Bald Eagle In Minnesota, Faces Federal Penalty
    Feb 10, 2026
    Federal officials say a University of Minnesota wind turbine killed a bald eagle, triggering penalties under federal wildlife law. […]
  • winter cityscapeNYT Admits Observable Data Undercuts Claims Of Worsening Arctic Cold Blasts
    Feb 10, 2026
    NYT acknowledges observable data show Arctic cold blasts are becoming less extreme, despite claims tying them to polar vortex disruption. […]
  • distorted dataInternal Records Show How DEI Mandates Infected Biden-Era Climate Research
    Feb 10, 2026
    Internal records show DEI mandates shaped team selection in Biden-era climate research, prioritizing race, gender, and 'lived experience.' […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky