Ever since Joe D’Aleo’s paper came out showing how almost all warming is due to data tampering, Zeke Hausfather from Berkeley Fake Earth has been telling the press that temperature adjustments reduce warming.
Joe D’Aleo captured this NOAA graph for Maine in 2012.
Compare vs. their current graph.
Climate at a Glance | National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI)
Maine used to show no warming and their hottest year was 1913. The same year that California set the world’s hottest temperature of 134F. NOAA has since massively cooled Maine’s past and completely erased the hot year of 1913.
Climate experts are also working hard to erase the 1913 record heat in California.
Read more at Real Climate Science
Providing that James Hansen has tried to connect big snow storms to Global Warming the same way these crack-pots try to comparing Hurricanes and Global Warming. Hansen’s a Nut a bi big nut CALL ALL SQUIRELS,CALLING ALL SQUIRELS
There’s science, there’s fiction, there’s science fiction. Gore and Rakooi use alarmism and propaganda in the pursuit of political power. Their claim to be the defenders of science is pathetic.
YOUR COMMENT proves how little you know about science and the PEER Review (red team/ blue team) Process.
.
**FUNNY how the Complainers/Deniers have to go back in time and can only find 1 chart to Whine about in REMOTE old MAINE.
…and then try to apply THAT, to all of science, on all subjects,
all over the world.
.
I cannot verify EITHER graphs that 1 DENIER has printed.
…on a previous DENIER EXTRAVAGANZA.
.. 80 graphs were said to PROVE GLOBAL WARMING A MYTH
based on LIES…….UPON enlarging and tunneling into the graphs
…..78 of the 80 graphs didn’t even apply at all, and therefor WERE DAMNABLE LIES by those DENIERS.
The remaining 2 did not prove what the DENIERS claimed. A LIE !
It appears rakooi is the one revealing minimal science knowledge. Challenging hypothesis is considered to be quite consistent with scientific protocol and ridicule of the questioner is not considered to be within the behaviors of real scientists. Unless of course, by ‘science’ he refers to the science of fund driven outcomes, then he appears quite consistent.
I’ve expressed doubt that Pruitt’s Red team/Blue team debate would change anything because the Warmists wouldn’t engage. However, if they focused on the temperature data collection and “adjustments” (manipulation) it would confront Mann et al. They’re breaking every rule of data analysis.