• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Yes, Rick Perry Is Qualified To Be Secretary Of Energy

by John Daniel Davidson, Federalist
December 15, 2016, 7:48 AM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
0

Let’s get something out of the way right now: Rick Perry is not only qualified to run the Department of Energy, he was among the most qualified candidates for president in 2016. His 14 years as governor of Texas qualifies him for the White House, full stop.

That’s not just because he’s the Lone Star State’s longest-serving governor, but also because he did a great job. During his tenure, Texas created more jobs than all 49 other states combined—if not for Texas, the country wouldn’t have seen net job growth until January of last year.

Of course, Perry didn’t create all those jobs himself, but Texas has the twelfth largest economy in the world, and basically carried the rest of the country through the Great Recession. As governor, Perry spent a lot of time on economic development and diversification. So when oil prices tanked in 2014, Texas’s economy didn’t collapse, despite the fervent wishes of Paul Krugman and the Left.

But of course the news on Tuesday that President-elect Donald Trump tapped Perry for secretary of Energy was met with the usual mockery and hand-wringing from the mainstream media. Yes, we all remember Perry’s infamous “oops” moment during a 2012 presidential primary debate, when he was listing the three agencies he would eliminate but couldn’t remember the third one—the Department of Energy. Representative of the news coverage Tuesday was the headline from AP: “From ‘oops’ to DOE chief; Rick Perry is pick for Energy.”

You Don’t Have to Be a Nuclear Physicist to Run the DOE

Aside from the cheap irony, some objected that Perry isn’t qualified for the job. “Does Trump know Department of Energy’s main job is managing the nuclear arms stockpile/nuke nonprolif/counterterror? How is Perry qualified?” tweeted Newsweek’s Kurt Eichenwald.

The New York Times noted that Obama’s two picks for secretary of Energy were both physicists, “one with a Nobel Prize, the other a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.” Perry, on the other hand, is not a physicist. He was merely governor of Texas for 14 years, “and before that was the Texas agriculture commissioner. He holds a bachelor’s degree in animal science from Texas A&M University.”

See? Perry can’t possibly run the DOE because he isn’t a nuclear physicist. After all, Obama picked physicists Steven Chu and Ernest Moniz, the Nobel Prize-winner and MIT professor, respectively. (Moniz, by the way, is the guy with the Founding Father hairstyle who often appeared in the news with Secretary of State John Kerry during the Iran nuclear negotiations.)

This is a ridiculous argument. A perusal of past secretaries of Energy shows you don’t need to be a nuclear physicist to run the department. The cabinet position was created in 1977 under President Jimmy Carter, and the first person to hold the post was James R. Schlesinger, an economist who served as secretary of Defense under Nixon and Ford. Under presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, the DOE post was held by a diverse array of people, none of whom were nuclear physicists.

To run the Department of Energy, you need someone with experience heading up a vast bureaucracy with tens of thousands of employees and an annual budget roughly the size of a large state, like Texas. (To be fair, Texas actually has a much larger budget than the DOE.)

Also, while it’s true that much of what the DOE does is maintain and manage the country’s nuclear weapons stockpile, as governor of Texas Perry actually has some experience dealing with that issue. After all, the largest nuclear maintenance facility in the country is just outside Amarillo. Nearly every nuke in the country makes its way through the Pantex Plant in northern Texas, which ensures their continued capability and functionality. Perry worked with National Nuclear Security Administration for more than a decade, ensuring the security of Pantex and every piece of freight into and out of it.

Read rest…

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024
Energy

30-Plus Signs That The Climate Scam Is Collapsing

Apr 09, 2025

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • un censorship complexUN Censorship And The Manufactured Climate Crisis: How Global Elites Are Silencing Dissent
    Jan 19, 2026
    United Nations pushes censorship, embracing 'invented' climate science while silencing dissent and targeting free speech. […]
  • decades of climate panic left abandonedHow The Perpetual Climate Panic Machine Finally Collapsed
    Jan 19, 2026
    Decades of climate doom-slinging failed—voters aren’t buying it, and the media’s fear machine has finally run dry. […]
  • climate defiance baseball fieldHollywood Stars Funding Radical Climate Activists Who Stormed Congressional Baseball Game, Tax Filings Show
    Jan 19, 2026
    Tax filing show Hollywood stars bankrolling Climate Defiance, the extreme radical group behind protests like storming the Congressional Baseball Game. […]
  • temp map bouysNOAA Calls 2025 Third-Warmest Year On Record — The Science Doesn’t Add Up
    Jan 19, 2026
    NOAA says 2025 was third-warmest, but sloppy land data and missing ocean measurements make the claim meaningless. […]
  • fuvahmulah island maldivesNew Scientist Misses The Science On ‘Sinking Pacific Islands’
    Jan 16, 2026
    Real-world data show many Pacific atolls are stable or growing, contradicting claims of inevitable sea-level submergence. […]
  • hochul energy cliffNew York’s Climate Act Goes Nuclear: Bold Promises, Zero Progress
    Jan 16, 2026
    New York’s Climate Act promises bold energy goals, but seven years in any progress is nonexistent and nuclear plans lag way behind. […]
  • Global disaster counts remain flat over 25 years, despite rising CO2 and record temperaturesA Climatologist Asks: Where Are All The Climate-Related Disasters?
    Jan 16, 2026
    Despite record CO2 and global temperatures, climate-related disasters haven’t increased—what the data really show. […]
  • miliband offshore wind ahoy mateyThe Climate Scaremongers: ‘Record’ Offshore Wind Auction Will Add Billions To UK Power Bills
    Jan 16, 2026
    Despite “record” claims, offshore wind contracts rely on heavy subsidies that will push UK electricity bills even higher. […]
  • Twenty Years Later, An Inconvenient Truth Fails to Hold UpTwenty Years On, Al Gore’s ‘An Inconvenient Truth’ Thoroughly Debunked
    Jan 15, 2026
    Twenty years later, Al Gore’s ‘An Inconvenient Truth’ predictions, from Kilimanjaro to glaciers, have failed to materialize. […]
  • bbcBBC Pushes 12% Pay Cut Claim Built On Hypothetical Models, Not Actual Data
    Jan 15, 2026
    BBC claims climate change is cutting U.S. pay by 12%. A meteorologist shows why the data tells a very different story. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky