Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Scott Pruitt will roll out a new policy to bar researchers currently receiving agency funding from serving on scientific advisory boards.
Pruitt’s new directive has already sparked outrage among environmental activists and media outlets critical of the Trump administration’s actions.
It’s not a surprise move. Pruitt said in mid-October he would issue a directive to “ensure the independence and transparency and objectivity with respect to the scientific advice that we’re getting at the agency.”
Republicans have tried to reform EPA’s science advisory boards for years, pushing legislation to block researchers receiving government grants from serving on such boards. Conservatives argue serving on EPA boards while taking agency funding could compromise their independence.
“Over the years, those individuals, as they’ve served in those capacities, guess what’s also happened?” Pruitt told an audience at the Heritage Foundation earlier this month. “They’ve received monies through grants, and sometimes substantial monies through grants.”
“And if we have individuals that are on those boards receiving money from the agency, sometimes going back years and years, to the tune of literally tens of millions of dollars over time,” Pruitt said, “that to me causes question on the independence and the veracity and the transparency of those recommendations that are coming our way.”
Once Pruitt’s order is in place, EPA will have to replace current science advisers who benefit from agency grants.
In 2016, the Energy & Environment Legal Institute sued EPA to prevent its Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC) from meeting after finding that 24 of its 26 members had received or are the current recipients of EPA grants.
In total, panel members received more than $190 million from EPA. Seventeen of the 20 scientific advisers sitting on EPA’s ozone panel also benefitted from $192 million in EPA grants.
The Washington Post obtained a list of appointees to EPA’s science advisory board, which includes “voices from regulated industries, academics and environmental regulators from conservative states, and researchers who have a history of critiquing the science and economics underpinning tighter environmental regulations.”
Politico energy reporter Emily Holden tweeted that around eight current EPA scientific advisers “will be dismissed for having grants.” Though, that has not been confirmed by EPA.
It looks like about 8 current science advisers at @EPA will be dismissed for having grants. Just chatted with one. Stay tuned.
— Emily Holden (@emilyhholden) October 31, 2017
EPA is expected to announce new appointments to scientific boards on Tuesday.
Read more at Daily Caller
Scott Pruitt deserves a medal for returning the EPA to a useful department instead a lobbyist cess pool of USA haters .
Long long way to go but an excellent start !
It seems crazy that taxpayers are funding this kind of scientific INCEST in the first place. If the Climate Change Agenda could bear children they would have extra fingers and diminished mental capacity. OTOH, maybe this does explain a few things…
It was an ideal arrangement for the Warmist cause. The end justifies the means .
A leftist circle-jerk.
Time to hand Bill Nye his pink slip