• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

#Winning Trump’s EPA Plans Repeal Of A Key Obama Climate Rule

by Michael Bastasch
April 02, 2018, 3:03 PM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
1

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is preparing to rescind fuel efficiency regulations that formed a key part of the Obama administration’s pledge to reduce carbon dioxide emissions under the Paris climate accord.

EPA will announce on Tuesday that 2012 fuel efficiency standards for cars made in 2022 to 2025 are too aggressive for automakers to meet, setting off a rulemaking process that will take months to finalize.

Rescinding the 2012 auto industry rules could set off a legal battle between EPA and California, which was granted a waiver under the Obama administration to set its own mileage standards. Conservatives want Pruitt to rescind California’s waiver and toss out the federal standard.

“Fuel economy mandates restrict consumer choice, add thousands of dollars to the cost of new vehicles, and limit vehicle safety,” Marlo Lewis, a senior fellow at the free-market Competitive Enterprise Institute, said in an emailed statement.

“Contrary to the program’s original rationale, the world is not running out of oil,” Lewis said.

But EPA’s move also marks another shot against President Barack Obama’s emissions pledge under the Paris accord, which he joined in 2016. The Obama administration committed the U.S. to cut greenhouse gas emissions 26 to 28 percent by 2025.

Fuel efficiency regulations were a key part of cutting U.S. emissions. The Obama-era rules required cars to get 54.5 miles per gallon by 2025. Officials estimated the rules would cut 540 million metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions and save consumers money.

Democrats and environmentalists have opposed the Trump administration’s plan to rollback Obama-era fuel efficiency regulations.

Clean car standards will benefit the economy, create more jobs, and cut pollution, according to a new economic study. Learn more: https://t.co/EanYkHnWP5

— NRDC 🌎 (@NRDC) April 2, 2018

However, automakers missed fuel efficiency targets for the model year 2016 cars and light trucks by about 9 grams per mile. Indeed, the Obama EPA’s own analysis found cars may not meet the 2025 target, only getting between 50 and 52.6 miles per gallon by then.

The auto industry initially lobbied the Trump administration to review the mileage standards. The Auto Alliance called the Obama EPA’s 2016 decision to keep the standards an “extraordinary and premature rush to judgment circumvents the serious analysis necessary to make sure the standards appropriately balance fuel efficiency, carbon reduction, affordability, and employment.”

But now, some automakers are pushing for the Trump administration to keep the standards in place and allow for more flexibility in meeting them. Top executives at Ford Motor Company want “one set of standards nationally, along with the additional flexibility to help us provide more affordable options for our customers,” they wrote in a Medium post.

Critics have pushed back, saying the fuel efficiency regulations are, in fact, inefficient and allow the government to manipulate the auto industry.

“And even if you worry about global warming, fuel efficiency standards are a stupendously inefficient climate-change mitigation strategy,” CEI’s Lewis said. “Congress should end the reign of bureaucrats and put consumers back in charge of telling automakers what kinds of cars and trucks to produce.”

Read more at Daily Caller

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024
Energy

30-Plus Signs That The Climate Scam Is Collapsing

Apr 09, 2025

Comments 1

  1. Spurwing Plover says:
    8 years ago

    I sure would like to see some Democrat or Eco-Wacko have to drive a electric car to work on the Interstate surrounded by big semis that would squash them like a bug if a accident ever happened after all they would force us all to drive around in those tiny electric cars

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • newsomSupreme Court Deals Crushing Blow To California’s EV Mandate
    Feb 11, 2026
    Supreme Court ruling opens the door to legal challenges against California’s 2035 electric vehicle mandate. […]
  • EPA headquartersRepealing The Endangerment Finding Shows CO2 Was Never An ‘Existential Threat’
    Feb 11, 2026
    Repealing the EPA’s endangerment finding weakens the case for more climate spending and exposes the shaky foundation behind carbon regulation. […]
  • clouds sun hotHow A Scientific Myth Undergirds The Greenhouse Gas Theory
    Feb 11, 2026
    A closer look at the 19th-century experiment behind modern greenhouse theory—and why its findings don’t hold up today. […]
  • lee zeldin capitalEPA Rescinding The Endangerment Finding Hinges On Repealing Supreme Court Precedent
    Feb 11, 2026
    EPA’s repeal of the endangerment finding may fail in court unless the Supreme Court overturns Massachusetts v. EPA. […]
  • model v actual worldWhy Climate Science Is Not Settled
    Feb 10, 2026
    Climate models, extreme weather claims, and CO2 assumptions don’t hold up when tested against real-world data. […]
  • endangerment finding shredderHow The EPA’s Endangerment Finding Was Pre-Cooked
    Feb 10, 2026
    How a already decided EPA ruling became the legal backbone of U.S. climate policy—and why its scientific foundation is now coming apart. […]
  • bald eagles nestObama-Funded Wind Turbine Kills Bald Eagle In Minnesota, Faces Federal Penalty
    Feb 10, 2026
    Federal officials say a University of Minnesota wind turbine killed a bald eagle, triggering penalties under federal wildlife law. […]
  • winter cityscapeNYT Admits Observable Data Undercuts Claims Of Worsening Arctic Cold Blasts
    Feb 10, 2026
    NYT acknowledges observable data show Arctic cold blasts are becoming less extreme, despite claims tying them to polar vortex disruption. […]
  • distorted dataInternal Records Show How DEI Mandates Infected Biden-Era Climate Research
    Feb 10, 2026
    Internal records show DEI mandates shaped team selection in Biden-era climate research, prioritizing race, gender, and 'lived experience.' […]
  • biden electric carHow EVs Became The Most Expensive Boondoggle In Human History
    Feb 10, 2026
    Automakers have written down $140 billion chasing EV mandates as taxpayers foot the bill through subsidies and fuel-economy credits. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky