This past year should have dispelled all doubts that scientism has replaced Protestantism as the dominant religion of America’s elite.
Those Americans who, in days of yore, would have flocked to Marble Collegiate Church, in their Harvard ties and Sunday Go to Meeting hats, to hear Norman Vincent Peale preach about the power of positive thinking, now just stay at home and listen to the increasingly dismal (and often contradictory) predictions of Dr. Anthony Fauci.
But what’s particularly striking is how they speak about science in the most unscientific way. They say things like “TRUST THE SCIENCE!” as if science were a single, static, even sentient thing. It’s not.
This point was rather humorously made recently after Neil deGrasse Tyson, the obnoxious archbishop of this new religion, tweeted that “The good thing about Science is that it’s true, whether or not you believe in it.”
Several respondents pointed out that this is a sentiment that might more properly be applied to God. He even capitalized the ‘S’ in science.
But the best response came from (of all places) the Twitter account of frozen meat company Steak-umm, which, after mocking Tyson a bit, explained:
Spot on, and extra points for the “steak” pun.
To extend that point, one of the definitive marks of true science is that it’s falsifiable. As Pascal-Emmanuel Gobry once wrote:
Science is not the pursuit of capital-T Truth. It’s a form of engineering — of trial by error. Scientific knowledge is not “true” knowledge, since it is knowledge about only specific empirical propositions — which is always, at least in theory, subject to further disproof by further experiment.
But contemporary scientism is completely unfalsifiable. No matter how many times the high priests are wrong (or have lied), the faithful are not shaken.
We see this constantly in the realm of climate science, as when it turned out that polar bears were not actually nearing extinction, or when Cold War-era climate scientists predicted that “entire nations” would be wiped out by rising sea levels by the year 2000, and more recently when Canada’s Ministry of Environment released a report showing that “Arctic sea ice grew 27 percent” in 2020, contrary to all expert predictions.
Have any of these revelations caused them to repent? Not at all! They remain certain that every outcome — hot weather, cold weather, extreme weather, mild weather — is the result of climate change, and the only solutions are so-called renewable energy, carbon taxes, and — my favorite — “carbon offsets,” whereby the wealthy can pony up some cash and then live a more carbon-intensive lifestyle than the peasantry.
This last one is a pretty good analog to the abuse of indulgences that provoked the Reformation. Will something similar happen to the newly established church? Perhaps.
‘Fauci fatigue‘ has begun to spread to the general populace. But for our elite, don’t hold your breath. Scientism is just too convenient.
Read more at The Pipeline
Here is what THE SCIENCE says as explained by esteemed climate scientist Dr. Hayhoe.
https://tambonthongchai.com/2020/12/25/what-if-science/
One component of the problem is many people have only a superficial understanding of what science is. This includes things that are pretty well understood. If an item with minimumal air resistance is dropped from six feet, science can tell how long it will take to reach the ground. If 10 volts and 1 amp are forced through a resister, it will produce 10 watts of heat. Science has permitted us to do amazing things, such as put the computing power that used to require an entire building into a cell phone. What many don’t know, is that science is always evolving and correcting itself. At one time we thought that the continents were stationary, but we now know they are drifting.
Within the context of climate change, it is hardly valid to talk about science since the field is dominated by politically motivated junk science. This is the science the so many elite have chosen to believe in. Those working on the true science are labeled “deniers.”
Climate Change and Evolution have a lot in common their both a totaly unproven theory with no evedence to support it
Scientism in the news 4/16/2021
https://tambonthongchai.com/2021/04/16/climate-news-4-16-2021/
Sooner or later, someone will claim that they bleed Science.