• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Why Data Tampering Matters (or How To Hide Your Failed Predictions)

by Tony Heller
June 01, 2018, 2:16 PM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 8 mins read
A A
5
Share on FacebookShare on XwitterShare on Linkedin

I frequently post these graphs showing how NOAA and NASA have erased America’s hot past, and particularly how they made the incredibly hot year of 1934 disappear.

NASA 1999    NASA 2018

Let’s look at what they are erasing.  The summer of 1934 had ten massive heat waves east of the Rockies. Minnesota had a record cold spring this year, but in 1934 Minnesota was an extremely hot place – with many days over 100 degrees.

Milan, Minnesota, reached 113 degrees in 1934, compared to a maximum of 96 degrees last year.

Minnesota had many hot summers when CO2 was below 350 PPM, yet had none since CO2 reached James Hansen’s deadly threshold.

The last hot summer in Minnesota was in 1988 when Hansen warned Congress that the Midwest was going to burn up and dry out.

Here are some of the heatwaves of 1934 that Hansen et al erased via data tampering.

But what NASA and NOAA are really erasing is their failed predictions. Thirty years ago this month, NASA’s James Hansen warned Congress of increased heatwaves and droughts in the Midwest.  He had it exactly backward.

24 Jun 1988, Page 8 – The Chillicothe Constitution-Tribune at Newspapers.com

Hansen made specific predictions about the number of 100-degree days skyrocketing in several cities around the US and growing cotton in Siberia.

Every one of his predictions was backward. The frequency of 90- and 100-degree days has plummeted in the US.

Closest Virginia USHCN station to Washington DC

Closest USHCN station to Dallas.

Closest USHCN station to Memphis.

Closest USHCN station to Chicago.

All of Hansen’s temperature forecasts were wrong, as were his drought forecasts. Both the US and the Midwest have gotten much wetter over the past century, the exact opposite of Hansen’s forecasts.

Climate at a Glance | National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI)

Climate at a Glance | National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI)

And what about the predictions of growing cotton in Siberia? Scientists got this idiocy from Arrhenius over 100 years ago.

The Pueblo Leader – Google News Archive Search

Siberia broke the Northern Hemisphere record for cold this year.  Cotton doesn’t grow at -62C.

Thermometer in world’s coldest village breaks as temperatures plunge to -62C

Hansen “echoing the work of other scientists” predicted the Arctic would be ice-free no later than 2018. Democrats declared him a prophet over that prediction.

The Argus-Press – Google News Archive Search

Instead, we are seeing the highest volume of sea ice in several years, very slow melt, and ice volume almost reaching the “normal line.”

FullSize_CICE_combine_thick_SM_EN_20180531.png (1337×1113)

Climate scientists have been pushing junk global warming theory on and off for over a century. But the real hysteria started with James Hansen in June 1988.

As his predictions failed, he began to tamper with the data to cover his tracks, and now all that climate science is left with is failed models, fraud, and data tampering.  It is a criminal venture in collapse.

Climate Analysis | Remote Sensing Systems

Read more at Real Climate Science

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Skype
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky

Join our list

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.

We respect your privacy and take protecting it seriously

Related Posts

Extreme Weather

Meteorologist Exposes How Warmer Nights, Not Hotter Days, Skew Heated Climate Claims

Jun 04, 2025
Energy

‘Stop Whining’: Schwarzenegger Rebukes Eco Activists Freaking Out Over Trump Agenda

Jun 04, 2025
Money & Finance

DC Mayor Bowser Faces Ethics Complaint Over Qatari-Funded Trip To UN Climate Summit

Jun 04, 2025

Comments 5

  1. David Lewis says:
    7 years ago

    Every time I read and article on adjusting historical data to support the climate change fraud I make the point of why they do it. These “scientists” know that the unadjusted data doesn’t support the movement. That is the only possible motivation for altering the data. This is where the true fraud it. Many liberals and environmentalists probably support the movement because they are ill informed or are down right stupid. However, the “scientists” who are changing the data have to know that they are committing fraud.

    In true science data is compared to the theory. In this case the theory is the climate models that the entire climate change movement is built around. When the data doesn’t match the theory, in true science the theory is either altered or scrapped. In climate change the data is altered to fit their theory. That is why it is called junk science.

  2. Amber says:
    7 years ago

    TIME will run with what ever sells . Cooling,
    flooding and warming all have only so much traction
    before they need a generational refresh.
    Where are all those brilliant scientists and spin doctors that tried to scare the world about the impending ice ball ? Strangely silenced now .
    An underlying problem in society is demand for information outstrips supply and so quality has suffered .Climate science integrity has suffered but at the core is a lack of accountability and consequences . Want to run indefinite $trillion deficits , go ahead
    till the last day anyone buys your wall paper . The global warming scam will seem quaint and TIME will have some really scary stuff to cover .

    • Sonnyhill says:
      7 years ago

      ….and when we lose faith in paper currency, who will care about the precious “Climate” ?

  3. Spurwing Plover says:
    7 years ago

    The same liberal rag TIME that was lying like Barron Munchhasen about Global Warming back in the 1990’s was going on about Global Cooling and a New Ice Age back in the 1970’s more proof this who Global Warming/Climate Change is one of the biggist hoaxes in the history of Mankind

  4. Amber says:
    7 years ago

    NOAA and NASA need to exit the temperature manufacturing business . Why is Bill Nye no longer placing those very confident
    warmest year on record forecasts ?
    NASA cannot afford to trash it’s brand further by whipping up
    adjusted temperature statistics with predetermined outcomes . It really is below them .
    Way too much store is put on average world temperature claims .
    We can’t even predict the longevity of an active volcano eruption but some how are able to claim average earth temperatures are
    so precise after they are doctored and run through a political/media spin machine .
    We are wasting $trillions of non existent cash (debt ) over a vain
    foolish sales pitch that humans are now in charge of setting the earth’s temperature . That is insane .

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • beach summerMeteorologist Exposes How Warmer Nights, Not Hotter Days, Skew Heated Climate Claims
    Jun 4, 2025
    Axios blames climate change for hotter summers, but warmer nights, not hotter days, drive that trend. The real heat story isn't what it seems. […]
  • Schwarzenegger at Austrian World Summit‘Stop Whining’: Schwarzenegger Rebukes Eco Activists Freaking Out Over Trump Agenda
    Jun 4, 2025
    Arnold Schwarzenegger has a message for environmentalists who despair at Trump's approach to climate change: 'Stop whining and get to work.' […]
  • muriel bowserDC Mayor Bowser Faces Ethics Complaint Over Qatari-Funded Trip To UN Climate Summit
    Jun 4, 2025
    DC Mayor Bowser faces an ethics complaint over a Qatari-funded 2023 Dubai climate conference trip, allegedly violating donation laws. […]
  • cityscape sunStudy Finds Urbanization Behind Rising Temps, Torching Media’s Overheated Climate Claims
    Jun 3, 2025
    New study finds urban heat island may explain most temperature rise—casting doubt on media’s heat wave panic and the push to phase out fossil fuels. […]
  • armed epa agentsHouse Panel Investigates Biden’s EPA, DOJ For Targeting Businesses Over Climate Change
    Jun 3, 2025
    House panel is probing Biden’s EPA and DOJ for targeting small businesses with consent decrees, lawsuits, and 'sue and settle' crackdowns. […]
  • tesla superchargers stationNew Jersey Boots Tesla EV Superchargers Off Turnpike As Dems Target Musk
    Jun 3, 2025
    New Jersey removes Tesla Superchargers from Turnpike amid political feud over DOGE and Elon Musk's federal waste initiative. […]
  • Escaping The HeatGermany’s Scorching Summer of 1911 Undermines Today’s Heat Hysteria
    Jun 3, 2025
    Germany’s scorching summer of 1911 shows extreme heat and droughts long predate any so-called CO2 fears. […]
  • solar farm panelsGlobal Revolt: Over 1,000 Green Energy Projects Rejected Worldwide
    Jun 3, 2025
    Global communities reject 1,000+ renewable projects due to land conflicts, habitat destruction, and environmental concerns despite net-zero push. […]
  • alaska pipelineAlaskans Praise Trump’s Push To Reverse Biden’s Sweeping Drilling Ban
    Jun 2, 2025
    Trump officials move to reverse Biden’s Alaska drilling ban, siding with Native leaders and opening millions of acres to energy development. […]
  • kudzo vines old houseAugusta Chronicle’s Climate-Invasive Species Claim Refuted By Georgia Data
    Jun 2, 2025
    Georgia data shows climate change isn’t boosting invasive plants over native species, debunking Augusta Chronicle’s false claims. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts by email either instantly or daily. Check your Junk folder for any verification emails upon subscribing.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books We Like

very convenient warming

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

Share via
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Climate Change Dispatch