• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

When Science Influencers Polarize Our Politics

by Roger Pielke Jr.
November 06, 2023, 2:16 PM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
4
Share on FacebookShare on XwitterShare on Linkedin

mann msnbc flood eventsRemember who the enemy is: Republicans
–Michael E. Mann, climate scientist, September 2023

The quote above comes from a recent Tweet 1 by Michael Mann, the climate scientist who is arguably the most visible and influential influencer in the climate science community. [emphasis, links added]

Mann boasts more than 200,000 Twitter followers, is the go-to source for climate reporters on all things climate, and was the inspiration for Leonardo DiCaprio’s portrayal of a heroic climate scientist in the movie, Don’t Look Up.

Mann is also a fierce political partisan who is quite vocal in his utter disdain for Republicans and unwavering endorsement of Democrats. He has also not been shy in his effort to police scientific discourse.

In short, Mann is without a doubt the most influential and powerful climate science influencer on the planet. He is the Taylor Swift of climate science.

Does Mann’s style of “science communication” offer a template for how scientists ought to engage with their peers and broader society?

Some think so — in climate science, many have followed Mann’s lead and adopted a pugilistic and partisan approach to public engagement. Climate science is not unique.

The popular medical researcher Peter Hotez of Baylor University associates “anti-science” with Republicans and “science” with Democrats.

Similarly, scientists who have rejected the notion of a research-related incident as the origin of COVID-19 have chosen to characterize that theory in explicitly partisan terms. It is not just in the United States either — last month Nature chose to weigh in on the Argentinean presidential election.

Scientists are players in big-time politics! That’s great, right?

Maybe not. An overtly partisan approach to public engagement may be pathological, compromising public trust and confidence, and making the practice of science itself much more political.

Last month, Pew reported that among Americans:

When asked how well climate scientists understand whether climate change is happening, 52% of Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents say climate scientists understand this very well. In comparison, 51% of Republicans and Republican leaners say climate scientists understand this not too or not at all well.

Of course, the average American does not have the expertise to evaluate understandings held by climate scientists, so the poll reflects confidence or trust in climate scientists.

The large partisan split reported by Pew is not unique to climate or Americans. Even with the partisan split a surprising number of Democrats report lower levels of confidence in climate scientists.

Why is there such a partisan split?

The glib answer of course is that the split reflects something wrong with people on the political right. After all, if the overwhelming majority of scientists are on the political left, that surely must tell us who the enemy is, as Mann reminds us.

A current reporter for The Washington Post even wrote a book called The Republican Brain explaining a genetic basis for Republicans’ inability to appreciate science or reality.

An “us versus them” Manichean framing is seductive and enduring.

From this perspective, hyperpartisanship is a feature, not a flaw, and we all should be working to destroy the Republican Party.

An irony here, and it is a deep irony, is that the turn to partisanship among science influencers ignores a substantial body of empirical research and real-world experience that indicates that the politicizing of science by scientists quickly turns pathological for science and society alike.

The consequences include an overall loss of trust in institutions of science, which is replaced with determinations of trust based on identity.

In other words, instead of bringing science more fully into politics, pathological politicization brings politics more fully into science.

The public and policymakers are not fools — if we experts choose to make science more political, they too will respond politically. What did we expect would happen?

Let’s look at some evidence.


Roger Pielke Jr. has been a professor at the University of Colorado since 2001. Previously, he was a staff scientist in the Environmental and Societal Impacts Group of the National Center for Atmospheric Research. He has degrees in mathematics, public policy, and political science, and is the author of numerous books. (Amazon)

Read rest at The Honest Broker

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Skype
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky

Join our list

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.

We respect your privacy and take protecting it seriously

Related Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

House Panel Investigates Biden’s EPA, DOJ For Targeting Businesses Over Climate Change

Jun 03, 2025
Electric Vehicles (EVs)

New Jersey Boots Tesla EV Superchargers Off Turnpike As Dems Target Musk

Jun 03, 2025
Extreme Weather

Germany’s Scorching Summer of 1911 Undermines Today’s Heat Hysteria

Jun 03, 2025

Comments 4

  1. Crocker says:
    2 years ago

    Roger, I think that you are overstating Michael Mann’s notoriety comparison to Taylor Swift. Mann is detested among many circles where as Swift is mostly loved by everyone. I rather enjoyed Dr Tim Ball’s attitude toward Mann when he said Mann is from Penn state but should be in State Penn. I think that sums up what Dr Ball was trying to say about Mann’s hockey stick graph re the temperature graph from 1500 or 2000 years to the present at the time he concocted the graph. He just happened to eliminate the Medieval Warm period and several hundred years of the little Ice Age. Yeh they had to get rid of the Medieval Warm period because it was warmer than it was today, despite no SUV’s, air travel, internal combustion engines, cement plants and all the industry we have today. Spurwing Plover you might have a good there buddy.

  2. Spurwing Plover says:
    2 years ago

    Michael Mann needs to get stranded in Alaska Wilderness or maybe in the Amazon for a whole year then lets see how he can cope with it all him and those Just Stop Oil idiots

  3. Graham McDonald says:
    2 years ago

    So the democrats order everyone to eat insects. I’m like, “Give it to Mikey, he’ll eat anything.” (Keep the chunder bucket handy.)

    That experience might change his attitude.

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • cityscape sunStudy Finds Urbanization Behind Rising Temps, Torching Media’s Overheated Climate Claims
    Jun 3, 2025
    New study finds urban heat island may explain most temperature rise—casting doubt on media’s heat wave panic and the push to phase out fossil fuels. […]
  • armed epa agentsHouse Panel Investigates Biden’s EPA, DOJ For Targeting Businesses Over Climate Change
    Jun 3, 2025
    House panel is probing Biden’s EPA and DOJ for targeting small businesses with consent decrees, lawsuits, and 'sue and settle' crackdowns. […]
  • tesla superchargers stationNew Jersey Boots Tesla EV Superchargers Off Turnpike As Dems Target Musk
    Jun 3, 2025
    New Jersey removes Tesla Superchargers from Turnpike amid political feud over DOGE and Elon Musk's federal waste initiative. […]
  • Escaping The HeatGermany’s Scorching Summer of 1911 Undermines Today’s Heat Hysteria
    Jun 3, 2025
    Germany’s scorching summer of 1911 shows extreme heat and droughts long predate any so-called CO2 fears. […]
  • solar farm panelsGlobal Revolt: Over 1,000 Green Energy Projects Rejected Worldwide
    Jun 3, 2025
    Global communities reject 1,000+ renewable projects due to land conflicts, habitat destruction, and environmental concerns despite net-zero push. […]
  • alaska pipelineAlaskans Praise Trump’s Push To Reverse Biden’s Sweeping Drilling Ban
    Jun 2, 2025
    Trump officials move to reverse Biden’s Alaska drilling ban, siding with Native leaders and opening millions of acres to energy development. […]
  • kudzo vines old houseAugusta Chronicle’s Climate-Invasive Species Claim Refuted By Georgia Data
    Jun 2, 2025
    Georgia data shows climate change isn’t boosting invasive plants over native species, debunking Augusta Chronicle’s false claims. […]
  • Lufthansa Jumbo Jet‘Great Green Scam’: Airlines To Shift Mandated Net-Zero Costs Onto Passengers
    Jun 2, 2025
    Passengers face soaring costs as EU and UK net-zero rules hit airlines, driving up ticket prices, fuel costs, and compliance fees. […]
  • Biden speaks after signing IRAInflation Reduction Act Is A $2 Trillion Lie Crushing America’s Energy and Growth
    Jun 2, 2025
    The Inflation Reduction Act fuels inflation, energy costs, and reliance on China, risking blackouts and hurting American families and businesses. […]
  • Gov Hochul hearts ChinaCCP-Tied Nonprofit Caught Bankrolling New York’s Radical Climate Law
    Jun 2, 2025
    CCP-tied nonprofit backed New York’s $75B climate law targeting energy firms, raising serious concerns over influence, costs, and national security risks. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts by email either instantly or daily. Check your Junk folder for any verification emails upon subscribing.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books We Like

very convenient warming

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

Share via
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Climate Change Dispatch