Climate Expert: What The Media Won’t Tell You About Hurricanes

In January 1996, I was a post-doc at the U.S. National Center for Atmospheric Research researching hurricanes and floods.

One day that month my boss, the incredible Mickey Glantz, came into the office with a copy of Newsweek, with the cover announcing: “THE HOT ZONE Blizzards, Floods and Hurricanes: Blame Global Warming” (right).

Mickey tossed me the magazine and said, “this is interesting, why don’t you have a look.” So I took a look, and over the 26 years since have been studying climate, hurricanes, and their impacts.

In this short post, on the first day of the official Atlantic hurricane season 2022, I’ll share five points of consensus science on hurricanes that seem to be systematically ignored by the media, and especially by those on the climate beat.

1. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, in its latest report, concluded that there remains “no consensus” on the relative role of human influences on Atlantic hurricane activity.

Here is what the IPCC says exactly:

“[T]here is still no consensus on the relative magnitude of human and natural influences on past changes in Atlantic hurricane activity, and particularly on which factor has dominated the observed increase (Ting et al., 2015) and it remains uncertain whether past changes in Atlantic TC activity are outside the range of natural variability.”

One reason for the inability to unambiguously attribute causality to Atlantic hurricane activity is the large interannual and interdecadal variability.

The figure below comes from one of our recent papers and it shows the large variability in U.S. mainland hurricane landfalls and damage based on the state of the El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO).

There are more than 2x the median landfalls during La Niña than in El Niño and 16x the median damage — this relationship holds for the basin overall as well.

We are currently in a La Niña phase, so watch out!

2. The IPCC has concluded that since 1900 there is “no trend in the frequency of USA landfall events.” This goes for all hurricanes and also for the strongest hurricanes, called major hurricanes.

Below are official data on continental U.S. hurricane landfalls, updated through 2021 from our recent paper. If you think that there have been a lot of major hurricanes in recent years, you’d be correct.

One reason for the near-term increase in activity was an incredible unprecedented 11-year period from 2006 to 2017 during which no major hurricane made CONUS landfall.

Recent years are more typical of patterns seen during the 20th century. So for those who come to the climate beat during the past twenty years, it would be easy to think that we didn’t use to have hurricanes and now we do.

This is a good example that illustrates why trying to see climate changes with your own eyes is never a good substitute for data and applied climatology.

The data in the two graphs above have never been presented in IPCC or U.S. National Assessment reports, and I cannot recall ever seeing it in major media reporting on climate change (though I am happy to be corrected). One might think that such basic information might be of broad interest.

3. Continental U.S. landfalls are just a small proportion of all North Atlantic hurricanes, which in turn are just a small proportion of all global tropical cyclone activity. Since at least 1980, there are no clear trends in overall global hurricane and major hurricane activity.

You can see trends (or more precisely, the lack of) in the global occurrence of tropical cyclones at hurricane and major hurricane strength (12-month sums since 1980) in the figure below, courtesy @RyanMaue.

A little-known fact is that the past 12 months are very close to a 42+ year low in the numbers of major hurricanes on Earth (note that “hurricanes” are what “tropical cyclones” are called in the Atlantic and Eastern Pacific, but they are the same phenomenon).

4. There are many characteristics of tropical cyclones that are under study and hypothesized to be potentially affected by human influences (including but not limited to greenhouse gas forcings).

These include tropical cyclone rainfall intensity, speed of storm movement, the latitude of storm formation, pace of intensification, length of seasonality, and many more.

You can easily find different studies and different scientists with contrasting views on the role of human influence on tropical cyclones, but at present, there is not a unified community consensus on these hypotheses, as summarized by the World Meteorological Organization in several recent expert assessments (see the end for links). …

However, if you elicit the views of tropical cyclone experts — as the World Meteorological Organization did recently — you will find a very wide range of views on current states of understanding. The importance of a subject, regrettably, does not compel certainties.

For instance, on the question of whether the most intense tropical cyclones will increase worldwide due to greenhouse gas forcing, expert views range widely, from low confidence to high confidence, with many arrayed in between.

And if you look across model results, it is even plausible under a range of scenarios that tropical cyclones become less frequent and/or less intense.

A diversity of legitimate understandings is of course OK — this is how science often works in many areas. If the topic were simple, we wouldn’t need much science.

With hurricanes often placed front and center as the most visible manifestation of climate change, accurate representation of the current, complex state of understanding can be difficult.

Read rest at The Honest Broker