• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

We’ve Never Been Safer From The Climate Than Right Now

by Alex Epstein
December 07, 2021, 2:58 PM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 5 mins read
A A
3

climate protest planet BFears about climate change have reached a fever pitch. Governments, NGOs, and the media all warn that we are facing catastrophe – and it’s all our fault.

Our ‘addiction’ to fossil fuels, to cheap energy, consumer goods, and travel – that is, our desire to live more materially rich lives – is now sowing the seeds of our downfall.

But is it fair to damn human progress in this way?

Alex Epstein is president of the Center for Industrial Progress and author of The Moral Case for Fossil Fuels.

He joined Brendan O’Neill for the latest episode of his podcast, The Brendan O’Neill Show, to talk about humanity’s impact on nature, and why it is something to celebrate.

What follows is an edited extract from their conversation. Listen to the full episode here.

Brendan O’Neill: Language about the climate has changed a great deal. First, we went from global warming to climate change. Now, we are going from climate change to climate crisis or climate emergency.

There is this constant drumming up of awful, apocalyptic scenarios. We’re told this is a unique emergency that could end life on Earth. You have highlighted the role that the IPCC plays in stoking up these ideas.

Lots of people say the IPCC is relatively reasonable and that the problem is journalists and activists who take what it says out of context.

But you have a more subtle take on the interplay of these different groups. Could you tell us where you think the notion of the climate emergency is coming from and why it is so problematic?

Alex Epstein: It is just a fact that human beings are far safer from the climate than they have ever been. Climate-related disaster deaths – deaths from storms, floods, extreme temperatures, and so on – have gone down 98 to 99 percent over the past century.

If somebody is talking about the future of climate danger and they do not recognize the present, they are either ignorant or a fraud.

In the past, we have had 10 times more CO2 in the atmosphere than we have now and we have also had much warmer temperatures.

There is nothing that we could conceivably do that would make the planet unliveable for humans – the most adaptable species in history. So changes in the climate are not the end of the world.

The whole idea of the climate ‘emergency’ is baseless.

The UN secretary-general, António Guterres is also indirectly the head of the IPCC. He talks about ‘code red for humanity’ and about our extinction.

That this guy is leading the organization tells you something about it. We should question how it is that this allegedly scientific organization, the IPCC, is happily participating in a process of telling the public we are in an emergency and we need to get rid of fossil fuels.

Newspapers are screwing up, too. There are many documented examples in which they just wildly distort what the IPCC says.

But the IPCC itself never mentions that we are safer from the climate than ever. It is like a polio charity not mentioning that we have a polio vaccine.

The IPCC has this belief that humanity’s impact on nature is evil. Because of this, it ignores the amazing benefits of fossil fuels and the improving state of the world.

O’Neill: You argue that fossil fuels do not take a safe climate and make it dangerous – they take a dangerous climate and make it safe. That is arguably the most counterintuitive thing someone could say in 2021.

But it also makes perfect sense. When I heard Boris Johnson and Greta Thunberg indicting the Industrial Revolution, I just wanted to shake them both by the scruff of the neck.

It seems so obvious to me that from the Industrial Revolution onwards, we have made the world a safer, better place. Can you tell us what you mean when you say that fossil fuels make the climate safer?

Epstein: There are two ways of seeing the climate issue: through the human-flourishing framework or the anti-human-impact framework.

With the human-flourishing framework, the goal is to advance human progress, recognizing that the planet is potentially dangerous and wild. The anti-human-impact framework aims to eliminate the human impact on nature.

The starting point should be that the climate is naturally dangerous. We have to take that seriously. In my forthcoming book, Fossil Future, I write about what I call climate mastery.

I look at what climate dangers look like when humans are at a low level of productive ability. It is scary – you have these devastating droughts and famines year after year.

Take drought, which is historically the biggest climate-related killer. Drought-related deaths are down by over 99 percent over the past century. That is because we have been able to produce all these protections against droughts.

For example, we have irrigation through machines. Machines amplify and expand human productive ability very dramatically. We also have amazing drought-relief convoys that can save millions and millions of lives.

All this is because we have this incredible productive ability – we have figured out how to get these machines to do all of this work for us.

The dangers the IPCC is talking about are so trivial compared to the magnitude of the climate-mastery abilities we have and what losing them would mean for our safety from the climate.

O’Neill: The anti-human-impact side of this discussion is sadly the dominant side. You argue that these people present themselves as part of a science-led movement.

But fundamentally, isn’t this a manifestation of anti-humanism? A manifestation of a loss of faith in humankind and a belief that any human interference with nature is in itself problematic?

It is a call to push humanity back, to rein in human aspirations and progress to create some fantasy land where we live in communion with nature.

To what extent do you think the anti-human-impact movement is simply anti-human – a movement of misanthropy?

Epstein: At its core, it is. Look at the total indifference towards humanity’s need for energy in general and fossil fuels in particular.

A lack of energy is a life-or-death problem for billions of people, yet there is just no concern about this, while there is a total obsession with CO2.

People oppose fossil fuels and rationalize them by saying they care about making the climate safer. But the same people often oppose nuclear as well, even though it does not cause significant CO2 emissions.

And there is opposition to hydro, solar, and wind. That is because the real goal of environmentalists is to eliminate humanity’s impact on nature.

We are evaluating forms of energy not by how much they benefit human flourishing, but by how little they impact nature.

People say they want to protect the environment. But do they want to protect a good environment for human beings? Or do they want to protect the rest of nature from human beings?

Often, the two get blended. I do not want to save the planet from humans – I want to improve the planet for humans.

Read more at Spiked-Online

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024
Energy

30-Plus Signs That The Climate Scam Is Collapsing

Apr 09, 2025

Comments 3

  1. Colin Harkin says:
    4 years ago

    For those who haven’t read it, I highly recommend Alex’s book “The Moral Case for Fossil Fuels”. Excellent book.

    Reply
  2. Brian James says:
    4 years ago

    December 29, 2019 Climate-Related Deaths Have Plunged 99.9% Since 1932

    The Alarmist’s newest Saint, Greta Thunberg, “informed” us during a now-famous speech she gave at the U.N. Climate Action Summit in NYC.

    https://principia-scientific.org/climate-related-deaths-have-plunged-99-9-since-1932/

    Reply
  3. Spurwing Plover says:
    4 years ago

    Anyone who says we need to eleminate all use of Fossil Fuels is a total Fool no doupt fed this load of Anti-Fossil Fuel load of malarkey by the M.S. Media and the various Eco-Freak groups(Greenpeace,EDF,Friends of the Earth Etc) they belong to and donate to as well

    Reply

Comments are welcome! Those that add no discussion value may be removed.Cancel reply

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • oil rig drillAmerica’s Energy Boom Exposes The Folly Of Britain’s Net Zero Disaster
    Oct 3, 2025
    America’s energy boom and policy flexibility are widening the economic gap with Britain, where high prices and net zero goals are stalling growth. […]
  • Arctic sunsetNew Study Shows Arctic Sea Ice Decline Slowing, Driven More by Natural Variability Than Emissions
    Oct 3, 2025
    New study shows Arctic sea ice decline has slowed since 2012, driven more by natural variability than greenhouse gas emissions. […]
  • Attorney General Rob BontaNewsom Backs Off Climate Fight As AG Bonta Doubles Down On Suing Energy Firms
    Oct 3, 2025
    Two years after launching a high-profile climate lawsuit, Newsom is backing off while AG Rob Bonta doubles down on lawfare against major energy firms. […]
  • Farm irrigationMeteorologist Debunks Reuters’ Claim That Climate Change Threatens Europe’s Resources
    Oct 2, 2025
    Data show Europe’s droughts, weather, and biodiversity issues stem from mismanagement, not climate change, despite alarmist media claims. […]
  • Russ VoughtTrump Nixes $8B In ‘Green New Scam Funding’ In NYC, Blue States
    Oct 2, 2025
    Trump DOE halted billions in green energy projects citing poor economics, DEI hiring, and weak energy impact, sparking backlash in blue states. […]
  • SherrillRising Energy Costs And Dem Green Policies Top Of Mind In NJ Gubernatorial Race
    Oct 2, 2025
    New Jersey voters face rising energy costs as Democratic green policies and offshore wind expansion drive utility bills higher. […]
  • Hochul's green stringsHochul’s Election-Year ‘Inflation Refund’ Checks Can’t Cover Costs Of Her Green Agenda
    Oct 2, 2025
    Hochul’s election-year ‘inflation refund’ checks won’t offset the soaring living costs and utility hikes her green-energy agenda created. […]
  • South Asia monsoonSouth Asia Monsoons Not Becoming More Dangerous From Climate Change, Data Confirms
    Oct 1, 2025
    Claims that climate change is making South Asia’s monsoons more extreme ignore history, data, and other major causes of flooding. […]
  • wildfire carsRick Scott Wants Answers On What California Did With Federal Wildfire Funds
    Oct 1, 2025
    Sen. Rick Scott is demanding answers on how California spent federal money earmarked for preventing and fighting wildfires. […]
  • Biden test driving an all-electric Ford F-150.Ford CEO Warns U.S. EV Sales Could Halve After Federal Subsidies End
    Oct 1, 2025
    Ford warns U.S. electric vehicle sales could drop as much as 5% after the $7,500 taxpayer-funded federal subsidies expire in a month. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

very convenient warming

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Climate Change Dispatch

Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky