• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Vogue UK Questions If Having A Baby In 2021 Is ‘Pure Environmental Vandalism’

by Veronica Hays
April 29, 2021, 11:28 AM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
13
Share on FacebookShare on XwitterShare on Linkedin

vogue baby articleVogue UK confirms the devil is one of its writers with a recent article that questions, “Is having a baby in 2021 pure environmental vandalism?”

“While gestating my son, and probably every day since, I have wondered whether having children is, in itself, an ecologically sound or unsound decision…” is the soul-stricken query of godless heathen Nell Frizzell in her April 25 article for Vogue UK.

This misanthrope classifies one of the most worthwhile and beautiful human pursuits of bearing children as “adding yet another person to our overstretched planet.” Babies are now an act of environmental terrorism.

Heinous, Malthusian sentiments such as these quite literally represent the species suicide many climate-worshippers think it morally correct to partake in.

“For the scientifically engaged person, there are few questions more troubling when looking at the current climate emergency than that of having a baby,” writes Frizzell.

This poor woman is so grieved by the “declining health of the planet” that prior to her having a child of her own she “worried feverishly about the strain on the Earth’s resources that another Western child would add.”

And when finally her own little boy came into the world, Frizzell obsessed in anguish that he “already contributed far more climate change than his counterpart in, say, Kerala or South Sudan.”

As a side note, it seems uncharacteristic of a mentally ill individual such as this to prematurely select the male gender for her child before he is able to do so himself.

Frizzell is compelled to denounce procreation, her rationale being that bringing children into this dystopian world is predestining them for painful existences. It would be better for them to not exist than to live and have the potential for suffering.

There is no point in investing in a future generation when this doomed rock only has “just another 60 harvests left before our overworked soil gives out” and is “running out of freshwater” according to whatever climate-alarmist research she references.

Indeed, this is a dystopian world, not because of climate change, but because this anti-human perspective has taken hold under the guise of being a moral good.

The real-life implications of this sterile worldview are more abortions and state-enforced family size limits for the sake of environmental justice.

Anyone who knows anything of the progressive left understands the implementation of restrictive legislation on population growth is not implausible, and perhaps not far off.

This is peak degeneracy. Western culture is in swift decline and the increasing devaluation of human life only accelerates collapse.

As though contrary to her better judgment, Frizzell admits that she had a baby anyways. The desires of her heart won out in the end just like those of every other man and woman who naturally longs to bring forth little ones and secure a legacy.

Tragically, she admits that she would have another baby if her partner agreed. What a poverty it is that a woman limits her unique life-giving capabilities out of misplaced concern for the environment.

Instead of celebrating the procreative power of men and women, this anti-life attitude would have women feel guilty for wanting to have children.

To do so is to deny an integral inclination of human nature and deprive individuals of perhaps their greatest happiness.

Leading women to believe that having children contributes to their own destruction and the larger demise of the world is a sick distortion.

This ungodly, unchristian, materialistic, and selfish perspective of humanity as an inconvenience is a scourge on contemporary society.

One can only hope that this sick mentality will go extinct along with those who refuse to reproduce and that the rest of the world will outbreed them.

In the meantime, sane women everywhere should take their sweet revenge and have as many babies as they so desire.

Read more at NewsBusters

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky

Join our list

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.

We respect your privacy and take protecting it seriously

Related Posts

Energy

Democrats’ Massive Climate Agenda Loses Support With Most Americans

Jun 13, 2025
Electric Vehicles (EVs)

Four GOP Senators Call For Fewer Cuts To Biden’s Green New Scam

Jun 13, 2025
Electric Vehicles (EVs)

11 States Led By California AG Sue Trump To Save California’s EV Mandate

Jun 13, 2025

Comments 13

  1. Peter says:
    4 years ago

    With these kinds of headlines, Betteridge’s law of headlines applies.

  2. Spurwing Plover says:
    4 years ago

    Vogue is starting to sound like Time,Newsweek and Rolling Stone Etc pushing this Global Warming/Climate Change scam

  3. Chaamjamal says:
    4 years ago

    The population crisis connected to the climate crisis.

    https://wp.me/pTN8Y-9c

  4. Spurwing Plover says:
    4 years ago

    Strand all the Eco-Freaks in the Wilderness for month they could,nt live long without liberal Eco-Freak ideologies

  5. Sonnyhill says:
    4 years ago

    ‘ Most often, the children end up like their parents’. I believe that there’s something else going on, that children bring the climate propaganda home from school and give it to their parents. Modern parents want to look progressive, so they go along to get along.

  6. Gumnut says:
    4 years ago

    One only has to watch advertisements for The Handmaid’s Tale to see how the eco-feminists think. It is they who cause declining birth-rates, far more than even environmental factors. Indeed, rather than highlight the threat of a fall into ‘Gilead’, their Fascist, sexist, population-crashing dystopia, they are more likely to cause one.

    Equally, they have about as much understanding of the environment as they do of equality and parenting. Simplistic solutions to complex problems are all they offer.

    Actually, that’s wrong. They offer nothing. Everything is rammed down other people’s throats. They have little intention of giving anyone a choice.

  7. Gumnut says:
    4 years ago

    If having a baby is environmental vandalism, shouldn’t there be an environmental award for the clinic performing the most abortions?

    With apologies for the poor taste sarcasm, but it’s hard to know how to respond otherwise than with a screamed ‘Hands off my kids!’

  8. David Lewis says:
    4 years ago

    I will repeat what I and others have posted on this website. I hope people who fall for this “climate emergency” fraud don’t have children. Most of the time children end up like their parents. The fewer people who believe in this fraud that have children, then the fewer stupid people my grandchildren will have to contend with in their generation.

    • Gumnut says:
      4 years ago

      The problem is, of course, that their own lack of children is only one half of the equation. They also want to control yours. That is why schools are full of these sort of people – the sort who have no interest in teaching equations, because they’re too busy with the propaganda, or the sort who just let it happen.

      In New South Wales, a supposedly conservative State government has not undertaken any action against posters in a classroom that are, quite frankly, unfit to be mentioned here.

      If left unchecked, almost all children will be infected with this stupidity.

  9. Donald Cross says:
    4 years ago

    Well, the writer used the right phrase twice to describe the new mommy……………….. Mental Illness!
    Please put the baby up for adoption before you do any more harm !

  10. Shoki Kaneda says:
    4 years ago

    Watermelons, liberals and assorted, other communists should all be discouraged from breeding. It would make the world a better place.

  11. Spurwing Plover says:
    4 years ago

    What other kind of poppycock will Vogue UK come up with other then this load of nonsense?

  12. Steve Bunten says:
    4 years ago

    So this ignorant fool thinks she’s scientifically literate. Clearly she’s never dug into the actual science surrounding the lie that we humans are changing the global climate or she wouldn’t write such trash.

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • it's ot easy being greenDemocrats’ Massive Climate Agenda Loses Support With Most Americans
    Jun 13, 2025
    Democrats face growing backlash as many Americans reject Biden’s costly climate agenda and Trump rolls back key policies. […]
  • solar panel workerFour GOP Senators Call For Fewer Cuts To Biden’s Green New Scam
    Jun 13, 2025
    Four GOP senators break ranks, warn against full repeal of green energy subsidies in Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act. […]
  • Driving electric will now be a consumer choice.11 States Led By California AG Sue Trump To Save California’s EV Mandate
    Jun 13, 2025
    California and 10 other states sued Trump over 3 Congressional resolutions blocking the Golden State’s de facto ban on new gas-powered cars. […]
  • Ice Harbor Dam snake riverTrump Revokes Biden’s Snake River Dam Order, Citing Energy And Salmon Recovery
    Jun 13, 2025
    Trump revokes Biden’s executive action on Snake River dams, drawing praise from salmon supporters and criticism from environmentalists. […]
  • President Trump signs resolutions against California's electric vehicle mandates.It’s Official! Trump Nixes California’s Electric Vehicle Mandate
    Jun 12, 2025
    Trump ends Biden’s electric vehicle mandate, restoring consumer choice and rolling back California’s influence on national transportation policy. […]
  • cnn photo essayCNN Blames Climate Change For Man-Made Disasters In Deceptive Photo Essay
    Jun 12, 2025
    CNN uses emotional photos to push a climate narrative, but the real causes are poor policy, bad planning, and human neglect—not climate. […]
  • Ivanpah Solar FarmCalifornia’s Ivanpah Solar Plant Shutting Down Over High Costs, Low Output
    Jun 12, 2025
    California’s $2.2B solar gamble flops as Ivanpah shuts down early, while the Diablo Canyon nuclear plant quietly powers on. […]
  • Sierra Club protestSierra Club, Major Green Groups Cut Jobs As Trump Scraps Climate Programs
    Jun 12, 2025
    Sierra Club and other green groups have cut jobs as Trump kills green energy policies amid a shifting climate activism landscape. […]
  • Lee ZeldinTrump EPA Overturns Biden-Era Rules That Would Close Coal, Gas Plants
    Jun 12, 2025
    Trump’s EPA scraps Biden-era rules targeting coal and gas plants, citing energy costs, grid risks, and regulatory overreach. […]
  • NASA MSU satelliteClimatologist Details How NASA GISS And Climate.gov Drain Taxpayer Dollars
    Jun 11, 2025
    Taxpayer-funded agencies like NASA GISS and NOAA are pushing climate fear to secure funding, blurring the line between science and advocacy. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts by email either instantly or daily. Check your Junk folder for any verification emails upon subscribing.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books We Like

very convenient warming

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

Share via
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Climate Change Dispatch