• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Vogue UK Questions If Having A Baby In 2021 Is ‘Pure Environmental Vandalism’

by Veronica Hays
April 29, 2021, 11:28 AM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
13

vogue baby articleVogue UK confirms the devil is one of its writers with a recent article that questions, “Is having a baby in 2021 pure environmental vandalism?”

“While gestating my son, and probably every day since, I have wondered whether having children is, in itself, an ecologically sound or unsound decision…” is the soul-stricken query of godless heathen Nell Frizzell in her April 25 article for Vogue UK.

This misanthrope classifies one of the most worthwhile and beautiful human pursuits of bearing children as “adding yet another person to our overstretched planet.” Babies are now an act of environmental terrorism.

Heinous, Malthusian sentiments such as these quite literally represent the species suicide many climate-worshippers think it morally correct to partake in.

“For the scientifically engaged person, there are few questions more troubling when looking at the current climate emergency than that of having a baby,” writes Frizzell.

This poor woman is so grieved by the “declining health of the planet” that prior to her having a child of her own she “worried feverishly about the strain on the Earth’s resources that another Western child would add.”

And when finally her own little boy came into the world, Frizzell obsessed in anguish that he “already contributed far more climate change than his counterpart in, say, Kerala or South Sudan.”

As a side note, it seems uncharacteristic of a mentally ill individual such as this to prematurely select the male gender for her child before he is able to do so himself.

Frizzell is compelled to denounce procreation, her rationale being that bringing children into this dystopian world is predestining them for painful existences. It would be better for them to not exist than to live and have the potential for suffering.

There is no point in investing in a future generation when this doomed rock only has “just another 60 harvests left before our overworked soil gives out” and is “running out of freshwater” according to whatever climate-alarmist research she references.

Indeed, this is a dystopian world, not because of climate change, but because this anti-human perspective has taken hold under the guise of being a moral good.

The real-life implications of this sterile worldview are more abortions and state-enforced family size limits for the sake of environmental justice.

Anyone who knows anything of the progressive left understands the implementation of restrictive legislation on population growth is not implausible, and perhaps not far off.

This is peak degeneracy. Western culture is in swift decline and the increasing devaluation of human life only accelerates collapse.

As though contrary to her better judgment, Frizzell admits that she had a baby anyways. The desires of her heart won out in the end just like those of every other man and woman who naturally longs to bring forth little ones and secure a legacy.

Tragically, she admits that she would have another baby if her partner agreed. What a poverty it is that a woman limits her unique life-giving capabilities out of misplaced concern for the environment.

Instead of celebrating the procreative power of men and women, this anti-life attitude would have women feel guilty for wanting to have children.

To do so is to deny an integral inclination of human nature and deprive individuals of perhaps their greatest happiness.

Leading women to believe that having children contributes to their own destruction and the larger demise of the world is a sick distortion.

This ungodly, unchristian, materialistic, and selfish perspective of humanity as an inconvenience is a scourge on contemporary society.

One can only hope that this sick mentality will go extinct along with those who refuse to reproduce and that the rest of the world will outbreed them.

In the meantime, sane women everywhere should take their sweet revenge and have as many babies as they so desire.

Read more at NewsBusters

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024
Energy

30-Plus Signs That The Climate Scam Is Collapsing

Apr 09, 2025

Comments 13

  1. Peter says:
    4 years ago

    With these kinds of headlines, Betteridge’s law of headlines applies.

    Reply
  2. Spurwing Plover says:
    4 years ago

    Vogue is starting to sound like Time,Newsweek and Rolling Stone Etc pushing this Global Warming/Climate Change scam

    Reply
  3. Chaamjamal says:
    4 years ago

    The population crisis connected to the climate crisis.

    https://wp.me/pTN8Y-9c

    Reply
  4. Spurwing Plover says:
    4 years ago

    Strand all the Eco-Freaks in the Wilderness for month they could,nt live long without liberal Eco-Freak ideologies

    Reply
  5. Sonnyhill says:
    4 years ago

    ‘ Most often, the children end up like their parents’. I believe that there’s something else going on, that children bring the climate propaganda home from school and give it to their parents. Modern parents want to look progressive, so they go along to get along.

    Reply
  6. Gumnut says:
    4 years ago

    One only has to watch advertisements for The Handmaid’s Tale to see how the eco-feminists think. It is they who cause declining birth-rates, far more than even environmental factors. Indeed, rather than highlight the threat of a fall into ‘Gilead’, their Fascist, sexist, population-crashing dystopia, they are more likely to cause one.

    Equally, they have about as much understanding of the environment as they do of equality and parenting. Simplistic solutions to complex problems are all they offer.

    Actually, that’s wrong. They offer nothing. Everything is rammed down other people’s throats. They have little intention of giving anyone a choice.

    Reply
  7. Gumnut says:
    4 years ago

    If having a baby is environmental vandalism, shouldn’t there be an environmental award for the clinic performing the most abortions?

    With apologies for the poor taste sarcasm, but it’s hard to know how to respond otherwise than with a screamed ‘Hands off my kids!’

    Reply
  8. David Lewis says:
    4 years ago

    I will repeat what I and others have posted on this website. I hope people who fall for this “climate emergency” fraud don’t have children. Most of the time children end up like their parents. The fewer people who believe in this fraud that have children, then the fewer stupid people my grandchildren will have to contend with in their generation.

    Reply
    • Gumnut says:
      4 years ago

      The problem is, of course, that their own lack of children is only one half of the equation. They also want to control yours. That is why schools are full of these sort of people – the sort who have no interest in teaching equations, because they’re too busy with the propaganda, or the sort who just let it happen.

      In New South Wales, a supposedly conservative State government has not undertaken any action against posters in a classroom that are, quite frankly, unfit to be mentioned here.

      If left unchecked, almost all children will be infected with this stupidity.

      Reply
  9. Donald Cross says:
    4 years ago

    Well, the writer used the right phrase twice to describe the new mommy……………….. Mental Illness!
    Please put the baby up for adoption before you do any more harm !

    Reply
  10. Shoki Kaneda says:
    4 years ago

    Watermelons, liberals and assorted, other communists should all be discouraged from breeding. It would make the world a better place.

    Reply
  11. Spurwing Plover says:
    4 years ago

    What other kind of poppycock will Vogue UK come up with other then this load of nonsense?

    Reply
  12. Steve Bunten says:
    4 years ago

    So this ignorant fool thinks she’s scientifically literate. Clearly she’s never dug into the actual science surrounding the lie that we humans are changing the global climate or she wouldn’t write such trash.

    Reply

Comments are welcome! Those that add no discussion value may be removed.Cancel reply

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • oil rig drillAmerica’s Energy Boom Exposes The Folly Of Britain’s Net Zero Disaster
    Oct 3, 2025
    America’s energy boom and policy flexibility are widening the economic gap with Britain, where high prices and net zero goals are stalling growth. […]
  • Arctic sunsetNew Study Shows Arctic Sea Ice Decline Slowing, Driven More by Natural Variability Than Emissions
    Oct 3, 2025
    New study shows Arctic sea ice decline has slowed since 2012, driven more by natural variability than greenhouse gas emissions. […]
  • Attorney General Rob BontaNewsom Backs Off Climate Fight As AG Bonta Doubles Down On Suing Energy Firms
    Oct 3, 2025
    Two years after launching a high-profile climate lawsuit, Newsom is backing off while AG Rob Bonta doubles down on lawfare against major energy firms. […]
  • Farm irrigationMeteorologist Debunks Reuters’ Claim That Climate Change Threatens Europe’s Resources
    Oct 2, 2025
    Data show Europe’s droughts, weather, and biodiversity issues stem from mismanagement, not climate change, despite alarmist media claims. […]
  • Russ VoughtTrump Nixes $8B In ‘Green New Scam Funding’ In NYC, Blue States
    Oct 2, 2025
    Trump DOE halted billions in green energy projects citing poor economics, DEI hiring, and weak energy impact, sparking backlash in blue states. […]
  • SherrillRising Energy Costs And Dem Green Policies Top Of Mind In NJ Gubernatorial Race
    Oct 2, 2025
    New Jersey voters face rising energy costs as Democratic green policies and offshore wind expansion drive utility bills higher. […]
  • Hochul's green stringsHochul’s Election-Year ‘Inflation Refund’ Checks Can’t Cover Costs Of Her Green Agenda
    Oct 2, 2025
    Hochul’s election-year ‘inflation refund’ checks won’t offset the soaring living costs and utility hikes her green-energy agenda created. […]
  • South Asia monsoonSouth Asia Monsoons Not Becoming More Dangerous From Climate Change, Data Confirms
    Oct 1, 2025
    Claims that climate change is making South Asia’s monsoons more extreme ignore history, data, and other major causes of flooding. […]
  • wildfire carsRick Scott Wants Answers On What California Did With Federal Wildfire Funds
    Oct 1, 2025
    Sen. Rick Scott is demanding answers on how California spent federal money earmarked for preventing and fighting wildfires. […]
  • Biden test driving an all-electric Ford F-150.Ford CEO Warns U.S. EV Sales Could Halve After Federal Subsidies End
    Oct 1, 2025
    Ford warns U.S. electric vehicle sales could drop as much as 5% after the $7,500 taxpayer-funded federal subsidies expire in a month. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

very convenient warming

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Climate Change Dispatch

Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky