Talk is cheap; the familiar saying goes – especially from dictatorial nations about climate change.
The United States “Special Envoy” on climate, John “Forbes” Kerry of Martha’s Vineyard, met virtually yesterday with his Chinese counterpart, Xie Zhenhua, the head of China’s environmental protection ministry, and more than 30 other nations’ representatives at the Ministerial on Climate Action summit.
This annual event is set to monitor the implementation of the Paris Climate Accord.
For government careerists like Mr. Kerry, multilateral meetings are always sold as progress, even as real-world actions tell the opposite story.
Last fall, China’s dictator, Xi Jinping, said his nation would achieve carbon neutrality by 2060 – about forty years away. This is one of many indicators that China is unserious about climate change, regardless of its verbal “goals” and platitudes.
Rather, China’s ambition is to surpass the United States to become the most powerful and wealthiest nation on the planet. More solar and wind energy won’t get the Middle Kingdom to regional and global supremacy.
Before the meeting, Mr. Kerry urged the “kumbaya” approach to diplomacy by stressing the need to “join hands in a cooperative journey” for a cleaner climate and not “point fingers.”
At yesterday’s Climate Action meeting, the U.S. and China agreed to form a “joint working group” on climate change. Swell.
Can Mr. Kerry be this credulous? How many more coal-fired power plants must China build at home and abroad before U.S. diplomats figure out they are being played?
John Kerry, who reflects President Biden and Vice President Harris, is exactly who China wants sitting across the diplomatic table as it pursues great power competition. He has a history of being a useful idiot for America’s adversaries.
When he was Secretary of State for President Obama, Kerry negotiated the one-sided Iran nuclear deal, which gave that terrorist nation everything it demanded, including crates of cash secretly transported in a cargo plane for use by its terrorist proxies.
Messrs. Obama and Kerry were similarly obsequious toward China, desperate for it to sign the Paris Accord. China “signed” on the condition that nothing was required; hence, China is not mandated to reduce carbon emissions before 2030.
Paper-thin diplomatic agreements with America’s adversaries have not changed the facts on the ground, and new climate diplomacy being pursued this week by the Biden administration will have the same non-impact on China’s real objectives.
Rather than climate change becoming an issue of “cooperation” between China and the U.S., the Chinese will continue to exploit climate issues as a means to compete with and surpass the U.S. in technological, economic, and military dominance.
Energy is the lifeblood of a nation’s economy and of global power politics. China’s diplomatic pledges on climate are a means to coax the U.S. to continue surrendering its energy and economic advantages, without impeding the expansion of its own fossil fuel capacity.
While the Biden administration closes off domestic energy production, including shutting down the Keystone XL Pipeline, and bars new energy leases on federal lands, China continues to construct coal-fired power plants to support its economic growth and military expansion.
As discussed by Mark Mathis of the Clean Energy Alliance, China has at least 200 gigawatts of coal-powered plants in development, which will add to its more than 2,300 plants in operation.
Coal is a cheap way for China to increase its industrial and manufacturing capacity, and build alliances with other nations. Coal produces more electricity in China than exists in the U.S. from all sources.
Meanwhile, the U.S. has been steadily closing coal plants to the point of soon having fewer than 200 nationwide. All this puts the U.S. at a greater competitive disadvantage as more manufacturing jobs shift to China.
While the Biden administration urges international institutions and banks to refuse financing of needed fossil fuel projects in the developing world, China is delivering investment to more nations, including building coal-fired plants in Africa and other Asian countries.
For every pointless executive order by President Biden to reduce fossil fuel development, China is expanding the same by a much greater amount.
China also is continuing extensive mining domestically and abroad for essential minerals such as lithium, cobalt, copper, and nickel.
That means greater dependence by the U.S. on China for “renewable” energy materials, including for wind turbines, solar panels, and electric vehicle batteries. Biden’s hollow promise of “Green jobs” will end up more in China, not here.
Like the Soviet Union’s bad faith during the Cold War, China’s diplomatic niceties on climate amount to vacuous commitments to reduce emissions.
China’s fake diplomacy also is belied by its actions to expand readily accessible fossil fuel energy to increase its economic and military power worldwide.
President Biden and John Kerry need to understand we are in a new Cold War and should shelve their obsession with carbon emissions in the futile hope that curtailment might cool the planet by a degree Celsius in the next 30 years.
China is having none of it, no matter how many climate meetings it attends.
Read more at CFACT
More about these ministerial climate action summits.
https://tambonthongchai.com/2021/03/29/a-climate-summit/
Good analysis, Anon. The sooner the majority of voters identify climate alarmism as anarchy, the better. Green energy won’t fly. It’s an Apteryx.
The Democrats have simply checked out of traditional “great power politics”, somehow thinking that if it isn’t offered at Harvard, then the world no longer operates that way.
But eventually, reality will catch up to them, as with the failure of the Texas and California electrical grids. And so it will be with the Climate Change Agenda on the global stage. And this is already occurring with the UK & EU looking to impose a “Carbon Border Tax”: in reality, a tacit admission that Green Energy is more expensive (contrary to what they have been saying) and that Western industries are no longer globally competitive. So, reality has now arrived at their front door.
Ramifications of the Carbon Border Tax: The intent is for it to protect Western industries and force the rest of the world to go green, but what it will do instead is:
1] Require Brits and Europeans to pay more for everything they import, in addition to already sky-high electricity prices. And this will cause everything manufactured in the West to be more costly by the “knock-on effect”.
2] It will make UK & EU industries globally uncompetitive. What person, living in a developing nation, making a few hundred or few thousand dollars a year will buy a more expensive EU sourced product over a cheaper one made by China, India or Russia? For people living in the developing world, virtue signaling is not an option. So, the result will be that Western industries will be confined to their own domestic markets (where people can just barely afford their products).
Furthermore, look at the research money China, India and Russia are devoting to Climate Change. (~zero) Instead, they are prioritizing things like space exploration, something the United States used to do. And because all of the climate data is coming out of NASA, NOAA and the CRU at East Anglia, why would any of those countries trust the data and findings? (they certainly can see everything climate change skeptics can see).
China, India and Russia will play along with the West, so long as it involves the West weakening itself, but at some point they will kick John Kerry and the lot to the curb. Will this be COP26 in Glasgow, Scotland this year? It might be.
According to climate science, climate needs to be a cooedinated global response with the Montreal Protocol as the model. Climate heroism of nation states is just climate games or maybe climate politics but it is not climate action. The bottom line is that the UN has failed to give us a montreal protocol for climate change. Therefore there is no climate action. It’s time to prepare for the climate horror driven by natural feedbacks.
https://tambonthongchai.com/2021/03/25/climate-fearology-vs-geoengineering/
AO-C proclaimed that ‘we’ had twelve years to save the planet. I think that lines up with China’s pledge to flatline carbon dioxide emissions by 2030. That will be their year of the dog. Appropriate.
2030 becomes 2060.
Next year, 2060 becomes 2600.
Remember, we are dealing with people that have a documented 5 millennia civilization, a few hundred years is nothing to them.
BACK IN THE 1990’S THEY WERE SAYING WE HAVE 10 YEARS TO SAVE THE PLANET
Take a look at all that Pollution produced by China Hey Greenpeace why are you not sailing over to China in your Fossil fueled Ships and Protesting all of this Can we say Media Coverage?
How do you say “How dare you” in Mandarin?
Not allowed in China, not a valid question. Perhaps we should encourage little miss muppet to go and try?