The National Climate Assessment claims unambiguous warming globally and in the US since 1880.
They show a very detailed graph and map which expresses the claimed warming.
All that red looks pretty scary. Red is the color of fire, and it isn’t hard to convince some people that their carbon sins will lead to hellfire.
What they aren’t telling us is that their graph and map are fake. They have no idea what global temperatures were in 1880, 1900, 1920, 1940, or in fact the present because outside of the US there is very little verifiable data.
ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/ghcn/daily/ghcnd-inventory.txt
As late as 1940, there was almost no daily coverage of South America or Africa.
ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/ghcn/daily/ghcnd-inventory.txt
NOAA’s current data in Africa and much of the rest of the world is still fake. They make up record temperatures in countries where they have no thermometer data.
Real temperatures Reported temperatures
By their own admission, the ocean data is also fake.
date: Wed Apr 15 14:29:03 2009
from: Phil Jones <p.*****@****ac.uk> subject: Re: Fwd: Re: contribution to RealClimate.org
to: Thomas Crowley <th************@***ac.uk>Tom,
The issue Ray alludes to is that in addition to the issue
of many more drifters providing measurements over the last
5-10 years, the measurements are coming in from places where
we didn’t have much ship data in the past. For much of the SH between 40 and 60S the normals are mostly made up as there is very little ship data there.Cheers
Phil
The only location on Earth with good long-term daily temperature data in the US.
ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/ghcn/daily/ghcnd-inventory.txt
Before NOAA tampers with their data, the US shows no warming over the past century.
The lack of US warming wrecks global warming theory, so NOAA and NASA tamper with their own data to create fake warming.
The frequency and coverage of hot weather have plummeted in the US over the past century. The US isn’t getting hotter – afternoons are getting cooler.
The US temperature data is tampered with by NOAA in a massive hockey stick.
Which is designed to bring the data precisely in line with CO2 theory.
NOAA knows perfectly well that the US is not warming.
U.S. Data Since 1895 Fail To Show Warming Trend – NYTimes.com
The US and global temperatures are constantly being tampered with to cool the past and warm the present.
US tampering :
Global tampering :
1981: Challenge_chapter2.pdf 2001: Fig.A.ps current: Fig.A.gif
2001 version : Fig.A.ps 2015 version: Fig.A.gif
All of the claims in the National Climate Assessment about global warming are unsupportable junk science, made largely with fraudulent or imaginary data. Global warming is the biggest scam in science history. It has been thoroughly corrupted by tens of billions of dollars of government money – which fake climate scientists refuse to let go of.
The only thing global and unambiguous in the National Climate Assessment is the level of junk science and fraud it represents.
Read more at Real Climate Science
Your system has a problem, you identify the cause. A full 96% of the cause can’t be moderated or controlled. The remaining 4% of the cause can only be mitigated to a very small extent. Even a slightly competent person recognizes the system is unreliable, flawed and must be scrapped; a total redesign is required there is no option. Renaming the system will have no effect on its flaws.
Yet, that’s exactly what has happened. Global warming blamed greenhouse gases (mainly CO2) for increasing “global temperatures” but it was mostly a summer issue if an issue at all. Then it happened a name change—- “climate change” was born; AGW and CAGW soon followed but CO2 was still fingered as the cause. Warmists hung their hats on CO2; accepting 4% is man-made and 96% is natural.—-but their system failed because their claimed boogeyman can’t be controlled to any reasonable extent.
It’s past time to junk the venal hoax known as global warming/climate change and send the liars packing!
Frankly all these Global Warming Climate Change nuts should all be taken to either the north or south pole and left there for a month or two let them see all the ice Al Bore said would be gone by now and we wont be forced to listen to Al Bores idiotic poem
Even moron junk science ;0) sorry. Couldn’t help myself.
CO2 level in 1900 = 286 ppm and in 2010 = 329 ppm. This according to NASA’s own “adjusted” dataset. (adjusted for accuracy of course!)
https://data.giss.nasa.gov/modelforce/ghgases/Fig1A.ext.txt
Atmospheric CO2 levels, a paltry 0.0043% increase over 110 years. WELL within a 1% margin of error for even the loosest interpretation towards validation of scientific results. A big nothing burger. Junk science.
And we are to believe that man is driving this 0.0043% increase. Ok. Let’s see if there is a correlation or any real increase.
Looking at the past 110 years including all other man made drivers of CO2 production like worldwide growth of commercial trucking, trains, planes, ships or coal fired anything, war, huge domestic animal populations (the GWA fart problem) and tourism (one of the world’s largest industries) to name just a few.
In 1900 there were only about 8,000 cars in the United States and possibly not more than 25,000 worldwide. It was estimated in 2010 that the number of cars had risen to over 1 billion vehicles, up from the 500 million of 1986.
World population in 1900 was 1,650,000,000. World population in 2010 was 6,930,000,000.
Would a 3999900% increase in the world’s number of cars drive a 0.0043% increase in CO2? No. Would a 320% increase in world population drive a 0.0043% increase in CO2? No. And what about all that other man caused CO2 production? No again. And any chance the combined results that all three would account for that paltry 0.0043% increase in CO2 …………. hell no! The result would be too ridiculously SMALL for any chance of correlation. 0.0043% is a statistical and emphatically unmeasurable unreportable ZERO. A nothing burger.
https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/WorldOfChange/decadaltemp.php
“According to an ongoing temperature analysis conducted by scientists at NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS), the average global temperature on Earth has increased by about 0.8° Celsius (1.4° Fahrenheit) since 1880”.
From 1880 to 2014 the average global temperature on Earth has increased by about 0.8° Celsius. An average increase of 0.0059701492537313° Celsius per year. Two things are wrong here. First, the average global temperature of Earth is just that, an average of incomplete data amounting to a best guess with an unacceptable error rate for scientific purposes. And a 0.8° Celsius increase in temperature spread over 134 years is impossible to detect with any degree of accuracy above .000001% dataset “adjusted” or not. It is MEANINGLESS. Another nothing burger.
“Two-thirds of the warming has occurred since 1975, at a rate of roughly 0.15-0.20°C per decade.” Yes it did. Adjustments were made to insure it too. JUNK SCIENCE.
Beware fake data = Volcanic degassing releases CO2 so why would atmospheric CO2 level measurements reported by NOAA come from the Mauna Loa Observatory (MLO) when Mauna Loa is the largest subaerial active volcano in the world??? JUNK SCIENCE
What we need is lots more “Science”.
https://www.livescience.com/40451-volcanic-CO2 -levels-are-staggering.html
“In 1992, it was thought that volcanic degassing released something like 100 million tons of CO2 each year. Around the turn of the millennium, this figure was getting closer to 200. The most recent estimate, released this February, comes from a team led by Mike Burton, of the Italian National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology – and it’s just shy of 600 million tons. It caps a staggering trend: A six-fold increase in just two decades.” But volcanic degassing is likely responsible for far more of the CO2 released to the atmosphere annually. More studies need to be done…..oh hell yes!