The United Nations Climate Change Secretariat released its first-ever annual report this week, in which it held up its “Gender Action Plan” as a key to increasing the participation of women in responding to global warming.
“Climate Change is the single biggest threat to life, security, and prosperity on Earth,” said UN Climate Change Executive Secretary Patricia Espinosa at the roll-out of the report.
“This annual report shows how UN Climate Change is doing everything it can to support, encourage and build on the global response to climate change,” Espinosa said, adding that “UN Climate Change’s mandate is to lead and support the global community in this international response, with the Paris Agreement and the Convention being the long-term vehicles for united global climate action.”
In his foreword to the report, UN Secretary-General António Guterres expressed a similar conviction that global warming poses a singular threat to the world in the third millennium.
“Climate change is the defining challenge of our time,” Guterres warned, “yet it is still accelerating faster than our efforts to address it. Atmospheric levels of carbon dioxide are higher than they have been for 800,000 years, and they are increasing. So, too, are the catastrophic effects of our warming planet – extreme storms, droughts, fires, floods, melting ice and rising sea levels.”
The report focuses on the work of COP23 and the resulting Paris Climate Accord as being uniquely effective tools for combatting climate change and its effects.
Yet while there has never been a single documented case of a person being killed by CO2-related “global warming,” real pollution of air, water and land is killing an average of 25,000 people across the globe every single day, according to a major 2017 study by the prestigious Lancet journal.
In a strange disconnect, the Paris Accord never once mentions the word “pollution” in the entire 27-page document, focusing exclusively on the bogeyman of climate change.
In its study, the Lancet revealed that pollution-related diseases were responsible for an estimated 9 million premature deaths in 2015, or some 15 times more than from all wars and other forms of violence combined.
Although environmental activists like to talk of “carbon pollution,” in point of fact carbon dioxide (CO2) is not a “pollutant” at all. CO2 is colorless, odorless and completely non-toxic. Plants depend on it to live and grow, and human beings draw some into their lungs with every breath they take to no ill effect.
Some experts, in fact, such as UN climate scientist Dr. Indur Goklany, have defended rising CO2 levels as a positive thing for humanity. Goklany has argued that the rising level of carbon dioxide in the earth’s atmosphere “is currently net beneficial for both humanity and the biosphere generally.”
“The benefits are real, whereas the costs of warming are uncertain,” he said.
So as environmental activists jet around the world complaining of “carbon footprints” and preaching “renewable energy” while insisting that countries be taxed for their CO2 emissions, they are silent regarding the real and present menace that is currently wiping out millions of human beings around the world.
In the most severely affected countries, the Lancet report declared, “pollution-related disease is responsible for more than one death in four.”
Pollution “disproportionately kills the poor and the vulnerable,” the Lancet study found. “Nearly 92% of pollution-related deaths occur in low-income and middle-income countries and, in countries at every income level, disease caused by pollution is most prevalent among minorities and the marginalized.”
Nations have a duty to clean up their air, water, and land. A significant concentration of fine particulate matter in the air is especially dangerous and has been shown to increases the risk of acute lower respiratory infection, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart disease, stroke and lung cancer.
Nonetheless, this real health damage from pollution “has particularly been overlooked in both the international development and the global health agendas,” the Lancet report stated.
“Although more than 70% of the diseases caused by pollution are non-communicable diseases, interventions against pollution are barely mentioned in the Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Non-Communicable Diseases,” it said.
If the United Nations were truly interested in improving people’s health around the globe, they might spare a thought for killer pollution rather than devoting all their time and resources to promoting ideologically driven agendas.
Read more at Breitbart
Remember at all times the comments by former UN climate boss Christina Figueres (sp?): She said that the global warming/CO2 scam has nothing to do with climate. It’s about the redistribution of the world’s (read: the USA’s) wealth and the destruction of (the USA’s) capitalism. Climate-scare propaganda is simply a means to help establish a world-wide (non-elected) socialist system run by the United Nations.
Did you know Kilauea volcano is now erupting? Kilauea volcano is about 12 miles from another active volcano, Mauna Loa. Mauna Loa is also the worlds largest active volcano. OMG. What must those CO2 levels be like!
“Hawaii volcano WARNING: Is largest active volcano Mauna Loa about to erupt? Latest updates” As reported here and elsewhere… https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/946822/Hawaii-volcano-Mauna-Loa-eruption-warning-largest-active-volcano-latest-update
Oh, and NOAA’s primary CO2 monitoring site is in Hawaii, on Mauna Loa. So get ready for a DRAMATIC increase in atmospheric CO2 levels come May 2018.
“Trends in Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide
April 2018: 410.26 ppm
April 2017: 409.00 ppm”
https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/
“The MAUNA LOA data are being obtained at an altitude of 3400 m in the northern subtropics, and MAY NOT be the same as the globally averaged CO2 concentration at the surface.” where (MAUNA LOA) measured and adjusted CO 2 levels have been steadily increasing now for years. Would CO2 levels be higher than global averages if they were measured on an INCREASINGLY active volcano?
No. of course not. Rising CO2 levels measured on an active volcano is no indication that said volcano is trending towards eruption. It’s silly to even consider such a possibility. Just silly. NOAA is measuring only man made CO2 levels.
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012AGUFM.V52B..08S
“CO2 Emissions Measurements at Kilauea Volcano, Hawaii USA”
“The importance of volcanic CO2 release in Hawaii has been recognized for at least 100 years.” “FTIR measurements of gases released from the newly formed Overlook Vent in 2008 depicted degassing of a reservoir equilibrated melt with an emitted-gas C/S=0.2. Since early 2008, this ratio has increased to a C/S=0.6, suggesting possible mixing of reservoir equilibrated and primary magmas.”
Good point David . NOAA makes mann made temperatures .
Perhaps that’s why Bill Nye felt so confident placing bets that new “records ” were to be set .
Funny now that President Trump is in the betting has stopped . Donald Trump.s election single handily stopped global warming .
Another win for the Don .
Amber, I wish you were right, but NOAA’s fraud continues. The extra cold weather of last fall has been erased from the official records. Failing to stop this fraud is a great failing or President Trump.
And i’ll bet they dont travel on flying carpets they use fossil fuels where ever they go just like Greenpeace dose on their Fossil Fueled ships Arctic Sunrise and Rainbow Warrior II
In a way, they can control “the global average temperature” , because it is derived from adjusted data. It was and is whatever they say, and too many people are willing to accept that.
Gerry , right you are . A temperature goal ? WTF . This fraud should be completely unfunded .
It is truly astonishing that these rent seekers have the audacity to
to so blatantly BS people .
I have yet to see one credible scientific paper that support the
notion that human generated CO2 is the control knob for the earth’s temperature . Natural variables run the show just as always . Has the UN found a way to shut off a volcano eruptions
, sun spot activity, cloud cover and changes in deep ocean currents ? Until they do they are blowing smoke to further the goals of the greatest theft in history .
What a shame the UN has fallen so far .
Amber, you are absolutely right when you say you have yet to see one credible scientific paper that support the notion that human generated CO2 is the control knob. However, it is useful to know what excuses the climate change movement has come up with to make this claim. The primary one is their highly flawed computer models. Another thing I have seen them do is take the given average temperature in 1880 and the carbon dioxide concentration of the time and compare to today’s values. Both have gone up, so carbon dioxide is making the temperature go up. They ignore and I’m sure many are not aware of the fact that much of the temperature increase is a NOAA fraud. Another thing conveniently ignored is even though both CO2 and temperature have increased the details over the past 138 years show no correlation. In the 1910 to 1941 time frame temperature increased significantly with CO2 remaining fairly level, and to day we are in a “pause” despite dramatic increases in CO2 levels.
We agree that CO2 doesn’t dominate our climate. We also agree that a warmer climate would lead to sequestered CO2 being released naturally.
It has been said that warming precedes increasing CO2 . I think so. The sun does its thing, no “control knob” . Unless some cataclysmic event starts another ice age, Earth will continue to warm gradually and carbon dioxide readings will climb, too. Old ice will not survive in this scenario.
Living in the Great White North, I am puzzled that warmer is worrisome to Canadians. The people I know all agree that this past winter was too much, too long.
The epitome of elitist audacity from the “UN Climate Change ANNUAL REPORT 2017”
“Temperature goal Limit the global rise to as close as possible to 1.5 °C.”
https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/UNClimateChange_annualreport2017_final.pdf
Creating consensus on the global response to climate change reminds me of the story by Hans Christian Andersen, The Emperor’s New Clothes. Both schemes have no basis in fact. It’s all lies.
Nowhere in the report will you find any description of the science supporting the UN’s URGENT NEED for a global response to climate change because it is not based on science. It’s all lies.
The temperature goal is to limit the global rise to as close as possible to 1.5 °C but how is this accomplished by reducing CO2 levels??? It is a scientific fact that reducing or increasing atmospheric CO2 levels has ZERO correlation to atmospheric temperature levels.
And stabilize the global temperature at a safe level….. ??? What is a safe level? And how do they propose stabilizing the temperature globally???? They don’t say. They cannot say. It is all a lie.
The first quote in the article should read the UN “Climate Change” agenda is the single biggest threat to life, security, and prosperity on Earth
Throw in the Trudeau Climate Tax supported by his climate barbie.
As usual they reveal them selves by projecting their own faults upon others. One can only wonder what data they used to come up with this stupid proclamation. The UNs own polling data ranks glow-BULL Warming dead last on a list of concerns…
https://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2015/07/un-poll-agw-dead-last.png
They cannot figure out why no one takes them seriously anymore.
The UN lives in a fantasy world . Any organization that pretends CO2
will put humans in charge of controlling the earths temperature deserves to be defunded .
The Obama administration transferred $1 billion dollars to
the “Green Climate Fund ” , $500,000,000 million of that three days before the barn door hit him the ass on his way out .
That massive theft was never approved by Congress . It was done through an Executive Order that itself was in violation of the
purview and scope of of an Executive Order . It was out right theft and the monies need to be retuned .
The other $2billion of the Obama Paris Pledge will not be paid unless Congress approves it and given that the USA has withdrawn it will never even get to a vote .
Time to get the money back , just short pay the $8 billion USA contribution to the UN Green Climate Fund front .
$ 2 billion pays for a lot of other USA priorities .
The Useless Nations has failed totaly to bring a end to all wars and now their calling this Global Warming/Climate Change the single biggist threat to life and security? If the UN wants to see the biggist threat to life and security the need to just look in a mirror
Rhay might also want to take a quick read from the hate literature read 5 times a day by “peaceful” peoplekind.