• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Danish Academic: U.N. May Use Military To Enforce Climate Action

by SIMON KENT
December 03, 2019, 12:25 PM
in News and Opinion, Videos
Reading Time: 2 mins read
A A
17

un troopsThe United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses. [See the full interview below]

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralized procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfill it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1,500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods, and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News reported.

President Donald Trump officially withdrew the U.S. from the Paris Climate Accord, which COP25 is a continuation thereof,  in October as part of an election promise to voters, saying he was “elected to represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris.”

Read more at Breitbart

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Bipolar

New Study: Ice Core Data Shows Modern Warming Is Statistically Unremarkable

Mar 05, 2026
Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024

Comments 17

  1. pater eusebius tenebrarum says:
    6 years ago

    Please, someone de-fund these clowns already.

  2. Frank Garrett says:
    6 years ago

    The UN would be crushed. It doesn’t exactly have the best track record when it comes to peacekeeping or military interventions.

  3. kenny van ierlant says:
    6 years ago

    This guy is a NAZI a climate NAZI. How far are they’re willing to go to impose their ideology. This is a declaration of war against other people that have a different option on climate change. aim not afraid that the UN will become a NAZI organization and willed us to an ew holocaust but people like this are frightful because they think they have the right to decide for others. if I see all these youngsters in our streets shouting that CO2 is pollution and to get rid of it it depicts what the nazi’s did to their youngsters in thirties. Hitlerjugend on the streets. Its about time we fight back and not let this happen again..

  4. Dale Horst says:
    6 years ago

    When they march into China, I hope they take a few extra rounds.

  5. David Lewis says:
    6 years ago

    What alternate reality has Ole Wæver stepped out of? There is no way that the UN would try to take on the US, Brazil, Australia, and Russia.

    I am no fan of the UN but we need to be fair. No one in the UN has endorsed this idea. This is just some crack pop professor.

  6. Spurwing Plover says:
    6 years ago

    Evict the United Nations revoke all their World Herratage Sites and Biosphear Reserves tear up all those UN Treaties lets turn the UN facility into Homeless Shelter for all those Homeless Vets so they can sleep in a nice warm bed instead of a Cardboard Box

  7. Freddy Boom-Boom says:
    6 years ago

    Bring it on dipshits. Re-education time for the drone army.

  8. Boxorox says:
    6 years ago

    Terminate the U.N.’s lease in New York City. This potential call-to-arms is practically a warning of war against this country. Not that I’m worried it will come to that, but why do we let this go on?

  9. Terry Shipman says:
    6 years ago

    Donald Trump would have a belly laugh then have the US issue a veto in the Security Council. It will never happen while he is president.

  10. Andy Rowlands says:
    6 years ago

    It will be inteesting to see how the UN would enforce such military action, they don’t have a standing army.

  11. Lorne Newell says:
    6 years ago

    You need row boats as well.

  12. TB says:
    6 years ago

    BTW,
    How green is it to send a conventional armed force anyplace? Does somebody have a bicycle-mounted army the UN can borrow?

  13. TB says:
    6 years ago

    This is about the silliest thing I’ve ever read.
    Does this Professor Waever know that “UN forces” are typically made up of the US military plus 4 or 5 self-important-looking guys with blue hats? Good luck getting the UN to enforce anything, because the people that have to do the enforcing are the same people that the UN thinks need to be forced.
    Dumb donkey!

  14. JPS says:
    6 years ago

    When they start talking nonsense like this you KNOW they have lost. And lost it totally.
    The end is nigh for the climate fraudsters.

    • Charles Higley says:
      6 years ago

      This is exactly why we have never let the UN have its own funding stream and it has to depend on contributions from its member countries. The UN has been pushing for years for The Law of the Sea Treaty, which would give them control of the world’s oceans and all related commerce and fishing as well as an independent funding stream. Fortunately, the Law has never been adopted, dodging a serious bullet aimed at the freedom of the world.

      Has no one noticed that, when the UN goes into a war-torn area, the death rate always goes up, as they shoot both sides of the conflict. They also seem to be eager to set up drug and prostitution enterprises as soon as they can.

  15. Spurwing Plover says:
    6 years ago

    So now the Useless Nations wants to send in its Blue Er Green Helmets to enforce the eir demands how soon will be wearing the Body Armor the Imperial Storm Troopers wear? withoders of Shoot to Kill all those who refuse to obey their demands.Its way past time to totaly evict the UN and revoke all its World Heratge sites and Biosphear Reserves and lets just tear down that whole UN facility its a eyesore to anyone but brainless liberals

    • kenny van ierlant says:
      6 years ago

      This guy is a NAZI a climate NAZI. How far are they’re willing to go to impose their ideology. This is a declaration of war against other people that have a different option on climate change. aim not afraid that the UN will become a NAZI organization and willed us to an ew holocaust but people like this are frightful because they think they have the right to decide for others. if I see all these youngsters in our streets shouting that CO2 is pollution and to get rid of it it depicts what the nazi’s did to their youngsters in thirties. Hitlerjugend on the streets. Its about time we fight back and not let this happen again..

Stay Connected!

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Get notified when new posts are published!

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Recent Posts

  • esg investingBlackRock CEO Abandons Climate Delusion For Investor Needs
    Mar 25, 2026
    BlackRock's Larry Fink admits energy pragmatism will guide investment strategy as ESG losses and client defections expose the costs of climate obsession. […]
  • gavel earth courtMaryland Supreme Court Tosses Blue Cities’ Climate Lawsuits Against Oil Giants
    Mar 25, 2026
    Maryland's Supreme Court dismissed climate lawsuits brought by three cities against oil giants, noting local governments can't regulate global conduct. […]
  • butter spreadFake Butter, Hidden Risks: The Truth About Margarine And Plant-Based Substitutes
    Mar 25, 2026
    A look at margarine and new synthetic butter substitutes, including how they’re made and what ingredients they use. […]
  • abandoned solar farmBig Oil Is Done Bankrolling Green Energy Boondoggles
    Mar 25, 2026
    With falling political support and a disinterested public, oil giants are pulling back on net-zero spending for the first time in eight years. […]
  • offshore wind farmTrump Admin Pays $1B For French Firm To Scrap Wind Leases, Develop Oil And Gas
    Mar 24, 2026
    Interior will pay TotalEnergies $928M to terminate offshore wind leases off North Carolina and New York and invest in LNG and offshore oil infrastructure. […]
  • north sea oil rigAs War Rocks Global Energy Markets, Miliband Clings To Net Zero Fantasies
    Mar 24, 2026
    Ed Miliband insists the Iran crisis only strengthens the case to get off fossil fuels, yet the government has no serious strategy to achieve that. […]
  • ocean sun cloudsNew Study: Solar Activity And Clouds Driving Modern Climate Change, Not CO2
    Mar 24, 2026
    A new regression analysis finds solar activity and cloud variations, not CO2, are the dominant drivers of modern climate change since 2000. […]
  • wind solar landWind And Solar Are Breaking The Grid—And Your Wallet
    Mar 23, 2026
    Wind and solar deliver no on-demand power yet force ratepayers to fund two complete energy systems—a financial blunder on a national scale. […]
  • How Geological Activity Is Melting Antarctica’s Glacial And Sea Ice
    Mar 23, 2026
    Volcanic systems, geothermal heat, and seismic activity are reshaping the continent in ways climate science has largely overlooked […]
  • modern vs past weatherAnother Heatwave, And It’s The Same Old Narrative
    Mar 23, 2026
    When Denver shattered its March heat record this week, the media called it unprecedented — the old record was set in 1971. […]

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

Cold Facts About the Great Global Warming Scam

Climate prn book

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky