• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Report: UK Must Halve Eating Meat To Hit Net-Zero Target

by Victoria Friedman
March 11, 2020, 8:50 AM
in News and Opinion
A A
10
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

burger chips friesA report by a center created by the Conservative administration has said that Britons must decrease their meat and dairy consumption by up to 50 percent in order for the country to hit the government’s pledge for the UK to go carbon neutral by 2050.

The report by Catapult Energy Systems released on Tuesday is even more drastic than the government’s Committee on Climate Change’s January recommendation that citizens cut their meat and dairy consumption by one-fifth.

Catapult Energy Systems advised in its report Innovating to Net Zero that the UK must increase the number of wind farms, introduce more solar power and hydrogen power, and build around 20 “small modular nuclear” reactors to support three-quarters of heating in cities.

There would also have to be increased development of carbon capture and storage systems, land for livestock production must be slashed in half, and there must be an increase in harvesting biomass crops.

However, even if all of the systems recommended are employed at full capacity, the UK could only hit the target in 30 years’ time if Britons accepted drastic changes to their lifestyles.

Meat and dairy consumption “may need to be cut by up to 50 percent… depending on the success of low carbon deployment”. Britons would also have to curtail their air travel.

“Net Zero before 2050 is unlikely without highly speculative changes to lifestyle, land use and low carbon technologies – such as banning aviation and meat production,” CES said.

The body, which was created by the government to fast-track the UK’s transition to a greener profile, remarked in the report that Britons were “more resistant and emotional” when told to drastically alter their diets, demanding that whilst these recommendations may be unpopular, it was one of “two key lifestyle changes [that] will need to be achieved.”

Noticing that people do not want to make changes that make their lives worse, the report said:

“Early evidence suggests a general willingness to adopt new technologies (such as new heating or mobility) as long as these can deliver the same experiences as before. Conversely, approaching the subject of dietary change or aviation often elicits a more resistant and emotional response.”

It was under the leadership of the centrist and notionally conservative Theresa May that the UK became the first major economy to pledge to go net-zero carbon emissions by a specified date.

Right-wingers in the Conservative Party and those in the conservative movement have been disappointed to find that Prime Minister Boris Johnson — while hitherto a sound Brexiteer — has not rowed back on the extreme pro-green policies of his predecessor, but has instead pushed forward with policies which one report warns could cost £3 trillion.

There is growing concern over Wednesday’s budget which will reportedly drop the fuel duty freeze, resulting in a rise of 2p per liter for petrol and diesel.

This burden would be particularly felt by the working class — those that lent the Conservatives their votes in December 2019, handing Johnson an 80-seat majority — with MPs warning against laying the burdens of environmentalism “on the backs of working people”.

Robert Halfon, leading the MPs in their opposition to dropping the tax freeze, said:

“Boris Johnson said during the election that there were no plans to raise fuel duty because he understood it has such a huge impact on people on low incomes. People trusted him on that.

“This Government isn’t just about Brexit, it’s about being the workers’ party. It doesn’t matter whether you’re blue-collar or white-collar — everyone will face the hit of a fuel duty rise.”

Read more at Breitbart

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Skype
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky

Join our list

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.

We respect your privacy and take protecting it seriously

Related Posts

Energy

Expanding France’s Power Grid With More Wind And Solar Poses ‘Serious Risk’

May 12, 2025
Energy

Chris Wright Poised To Slash Biden’s Last-Minute Green Energy Loan Blitz

May 12, 2025
Energy

Texas Bill Requires Solar Farms To Have Fossil Fuel Backup Power

May 12, 2025

Comments 10

  1. Joseph Repas says:
    5 years ago

    Good!!! More meat for me!!!! YUMMMMMMMM!!!!!

  2. Ken Irwin says:
    5 years ago

    Windmills need a 3000 ton reinforced concrete base – concrete and steel manufacturing both produce prodigious amounts of carbon dioxide. Can’t have them without doing so – not chemically possible.
    Commercial Hydrogen is manufactured by steam reforming Methane which produces carbon dioxide – 2H20+CH4 = 6H + CO2 – bet they don’t mention that in the brochure.
    What a spectacular wast of scarce resources so you can put your virtue signalling halo on high beam.

  3. Roger Payne says:
    5 years ago

    This plan to be vegetarian/vegan was part of green revolution as planned by the German Workers National Socialist Party (Nazis) in the 1930s. Hitler Youth were organised for the new green revolution. Swedish Arrhenius, in the late 18000s pushed forward the idea that CO2 would warm the planet, but urged Swedish people to burn wood fires, since any global warming would be good for the cold Swedish nation, and trees would grow better. He failed to notice that experiments in glass containers in a laboratory are not quite the same as a planet and its atmosphere, troposphere and stratosphere. And the sun. And the whole solar system.

    • Joseph Repas says:
      5 years ago

      Exactly Roger Payne! Thank you!!!

  4. Graham McDonald says:
    5 years ago

    Fuel tax increase? Have the French smuggle a supply of Yellow Jackets over the channel…..

  5. Leo S says:
    5 years ago

    Well trained mindless monkeys will do anything the government told them to do. The best, fastest and easiest way to achieve their ZERO carbon goal is to commit mass suicide in order to save the planet. Go ahead, do it, you cretins you.

  6. Spurwing Plover says:
    5 years ago

    If these fools what to go vegan all over this Global Warming/Climate Change scam then let them if they want to be total idiots because they have fallen Hook.Line and Sinker for this whole thing then let them suffer the consquinces of their own foolish ideas

  7. Sonnyhill says:
    5 years ago

    Go ahead and live on potato sandwiches, that’ll leave more meat for the rest of us.

  8. Dave O says:
    5 years ago

    Let me get this straight. Britons have to cut their meat/dairy to 1/5 of current consumption. While China is building coal-fired power plants.
    Makes no sense.

    • David Lewis says:
      5 years ago

      Dave O, if you re-read the article you will see the cut is supposed to be to one half of current consumption. However, you are still right. This makes no sense at all.

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • power grid lines solarExpanding France’s Power Grid With More Wind And Solar Poses ‘Serious Risk’
    May 12, 2025
    France’s power grid is straining as nuclear collides with unstable wind and solar—Spain’s recent blackout shows what’s at stake. […]
  • man money wind solarChris Wright Poised To Slash Biden’s Last-Minute Green Energy Loan Blitz
    May 12, 2025
    DOE chief Chris Wright announced plans to cancel risky Biden-era energy loans that don’t benefit Americans or rely too heavily on taxpayer money. […]
  • solar panels snowTexas Bill Requires Solar Farms To Have Fossil Fuel Backup Power
    May 12, 2025
    A Texas bill would force solar plants to buy backup power for night use, sparking debate over costs, blackouts, and the future of renewables. […]
  • newsom presser gas pricesNewsom’s War On Oil Could Send California Gas Prices To $9, Analyst Warns
    May 9, 2025
    Refinery closures and Newsom’s hostility to energy companies could push California gas prices from $6 to $9 a gallon, analyst warns. […]
  • protest time is upThe Climate Scaremongers: More Lies From The UK’s Crackpot Climate Change Committee
    May 9, 2025
    The UK’s Climate Change Committee is ramping up the panic, but real-world data shows no rise in floods, heat deaths, or costs—just more failed predictions. […]
  • yorkshire offshore windUK’s Green Agenda Blows Up As Ørsted Kills Massive Offshore Wind Project
    May 9, 2025
    Orsted scrapped the Hornsea 4 offshore wind project, dealing a massive blow to Ed Miliband’s green vision and raising questions about UK net zero targets. […]
  • ev charging station16 States, DC Sue Trump Admin Over EV Charger Funds, Most Have Built None
    May 9, 2025
    17 states sue the Trump administration for access to $5 billion in EV charger funding, despite most failing to build a single charger. […]
  • weather montageNOAA Quietly Kills Its Billion-Dollar Disaster Database And Report After Years Of Criticism
    May 9, 2025
    NOAA has quietly retired its Billion-Dollar Disaster list after years of criticism over transparency, accuracy, and scientific integrity. […]
  • german wind farmHow Wind And Solar Sent Energy Prices Sky-High in ‘Green’ Countries
    May 8, 2025
    Adding more green energy makes power more expensive, not cheaper—due to unreliable output, required fossil fuel backup, and taxpayer subsidies. […]
  • bernie sanders fox newsBernie Sanders Defends Private Jet Use, Says ‘He’s Too Important’ To Fly Coach
    May 8, 2025
    Bernie Sanders and AOC are facing criticism for using private jets while promoting their climate-focused “Fighting Oligarchy” tour. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts by email either instantly or daily. Check your Junk folder for any verification emails upon subscribing.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books We Like

very convenient warming

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

Share via
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Climate Change Dispatch