Two Short Videos Perfectly Sum Up The Climate Change Scam

While it’s obvious that humankind can destroy its local environments (and has been doing that for millennia), it is equally obvious that the Earth’s climate trends are unaffected by humankind’s limited industrial abilities.

I just caught up with two videos from May that show just how ridiculous the climate scam is…and how it’s being used to enrich our most powerful geopolitical opponent to our great detriment. [emphasis, links added]

…snip… We are inconsequential—the climate changes due to its own rhythm. In the scheme of things, humans account for only a small percentage of CO2 in the atmosphere.

What climatistas don’t acknowledge is that a slightly warmer world is human-friendly because it releases into the atmosphere water that’s usually trapped in ice.

Water, not alcohol, is the true aqua vitae. No water; no life. When there’s drought or cold, people die. (For more on the risks from a coming natural cooling cycle, I recommend this and this.)

For the climatistas, logic clouds reason, and even their survival instinct. Their vision of paradise is a world unsullied by humans. I was reminded of this when I saw the following post on Facebook:

The article that answers that question is written for kids. It explains that humans are noisy, they leach blue from the sky, and they create pollution.

Yes, your house would decay, but new plants would bloom, insects would multiply, wildlife would return to America’s streets, and “the rhythm of the natural world would return.”

The article acknowledges that civilization requires effort but seems to yearn for humans to vanish, which “would reveal something about the way we treated the Earth.” Nirvana, right?

But of course, a humanity-free Earth wouldn’t reveal anything at all because the Earth has meaning only because humans provide that meaning.

It is our higher consciousness that sees both beauty and ugliness. Without that, it’s just a matter of animals, red of tooth and claw, mindlessly and instinctively struggling against each other to survive.

Understanding history, along with the Left’s anti-human yearnings, its desire to concentrate power in government, bring America to its knees, and pass America’s wealth to un-American nations, the ones without liberty, helps explain the incoherence of climate change theology.

There’s no way the Nomenklatura can admit to real climate science or their actual goals.

That’s how you end up with the following video, in which Sen. John Kennedy asked David Turk, the Deputy Secretary for the U.S. Department of Energy, to explain exactly how much America could lower the Earth’s temperature if it spent $50 trillion to become carbon neutral by 2050:

Biden official: It's going to cost trillions of dollars. There's no doubt about it.⁰⁰

Me: So, if the U.S. spent $50T to become carbon neutral by 2050, how much is that going to reduce world temperatures?⁰⁰

Biden official: *No answer* pic.twitter.com/6u8QmeJRdq

— John Kennedy (@SenJohnKennedy) May 4, 2023

There you see the true face of a climate bureaucrat: a robot whose programming breaks when asked to go beyond its indoctrinated universe and engage with reality.

Given that the purported climate goal is ridiculous, and the Left knows it, why the huge push for “clean energy” and those “renewables”?

Ms. Furchtgott-Roth, from the Heritage Foundation, testified that eliminating fossil fuels would do nothing to alter the Earth’s temperature in a meaningful way…but it will enrich China at our expense:

"Even completely eliminating all fossil fuels from the [U.S.] would result in less than two tenths of one degree Celsius in temperature mitigation by the year 2100." – @DFR_Economics

The Left's climate agenda is an injustice to all Americans and a major gift to China. pic.twitter.com/YEbTDlLMyQ

— Heritage Foundation (@Heritage) May 17, 2023

A warming Earth is a human-friendly Earth, nothing we do will change the climate, and everything we are doing will impoverish and weaken us.

Read the full post at American Thinker