• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Malcolm Turnbull Fans The Flames Of Fake Climate Outrage

by Tony Thomas
March 02, 2020, 9:17 AM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
3

60 minutes australiaTiming is everything, not just in the stock market but in the media’s climate reports. America’s 60 Minutes on CBS last February ran a hefty piece ‘Climate Change’s Role in Australia’s Fires’.

It features Malcolm Turnbull calling his ex-colleagues dangerous idiots while ANU’s go-to climate scientist Joelle Gergis suggests that skeptic ministers are potential criminals.

Their shtick looked plausible against a montage of fiery horrors, and in no way do I trivialize the fires. But as American viewers watched, the flooding rains were mocking the CBS narrative.

The piece was thirteen minutes. The producers had to tack on an awkward seven seconds about the rain.

Americans weren’t much interested. It drew eight million viewers, its fourth-worst result in 15 episodes. Comments on-line were vitriolic. The show typifies the media’s climate horse-manure.

Embittered Turnbull, introduced as ‘a political conservative’ is interviewed with love while spouting nonsense. Gergis is taken seriously about our climate being now as apocalyptic as she expects in 2050 (except it’s still raining as I write).

Prime Minister Scott Morrison – a no-show – gets this: With his country on fire, [he] took his family on a Hawaiian vacation. When he returned home, he was given a cold shoulder as he tried to comfort victims in the fire zones. He was heckled by seething residents, including in the hard-hit town of Cobargo… Cut to man snarling, You’re an idiot, mate, you really are, and a woman: He’s just a bloke with a whole bunch of people under him and they’re all idiots. 

Good job, CBS. Who’d imagine that fires are States’ responsibility?

Here are the money quotes:

Turnbull: We have been mugged by the reality of climate change in this summer. This is climate change in the raw. This is what we’ve been told to expect for years.

Holly Williams (reporter): When you were prime minister, were you warned that the fires were getting worse?

Turnbull: Well, of course. We’ve been warned by the climate scientists…The right-wing climate deniers treat an issue of science and physics and fact as though it’s a question of ideology, and their conduct is not just idiotic, it is downright dangerous for us here in Australia and right around the world.

Williams: You’re talking about people in your own party.

Turnbull: Of course I am, absolutely.

Williams hadn’t checked back to March 19, 2018. Prime Minister Turnbull stood in fire-ravaged Tathra saying, ‘I’m disappointed that the Greens would try to politicize an event like this. You can’t attribute any particular event, whether it’s a flood or fire or a drought or a storm to climate change.’

Now to ANU Senior Lecturer Joelle Gergis (promoted to Professor by CBS).

Williams: What [Morrison] has not done is make any change to reduce this country’s carbon emissions. Climate scientist Joelle Gergis says the future of Australia hangs in the balance [eh?]. Are the Australian people being betrayed by their politicians?

Gergis: At this moment, I think it is really reckless and potentially criminal because we actually know enough about the science now. I think the science is crystal clear.

Gergis is the princess of our younger catastrophists (make way, Steffen and Karoly). She’s a lead author for the IPCC’s next report.

She told the Monthly last August that she sobs about the climate during her (kerosene-fueled) flights, then switches to ‘volcanically-explosive rage’ because the hoi polloi won’t pay for enough windmills.

She’s on Flannery’s Climate Council and I listened to her in Perth a year ago announcing that climate change ‘is an ethical and moral issue, no longer a scientific issue.’

Gergis on CBS: This is the type of summer you might not have expected until the middle of the century based on past projections, so I think this is really redefining what it means to actually be living through a period of rapid climate change.

Williams [still leading the witness]: Are you shocked?

Gergis: Of course I’m shocked. I think this summer has been a real wakeup call for most Australians (and) to the world.

After running Gergis on climate and droughts, Williams ought to have cut to UNSW Climate Professor Andy Pitman last June:

This may not be what you expect to hear. but as far as the climate scientists know there is no link between climate change and drought. That may not be what you read in the newspapers, but there is no reason a priori why climate change should make the landscape more arid. We don’t understand what causes droughts, we don’t know what stops a drought.

But, but, Professor Gergis, isn’t the science ‘crystal clear’? Turkey-based Aussie reporter Holly Williams got inspired by smoke-filled Sydney on a Christmas visit.

CBS associate producer Jacqueline Williams, an Aussie resident in New York, was just finishing a CBS crock about Venice’s allegedly climate-caused flooding when her father rang from fire-threatened Rosedale.

She bought the new crock that the fires were ‘unprecedented.’

Fact check: In 1974-75, the area burnt in those bushfires was six times worse, and double the acreage was burnt in 1968, 1969 and 2002. It’s just that the 2020 fires hit close to home in fuel-laden NSW and Victoria.

Ex-fire chief and now Climate Councillor Greg Mullins recycled luridly his tale of Morrison being ‘too busy’ to meet him last year about fire threats and climate.

Mullins: Point blank. Told us to buzz off, basically. We’ve been told by senior public servants in Canberra that because we uttered two horrible words: climate change, we were discounted as being activists, and we would not get a meeting at any stage.

Holly Williams’ only decent question was to Turnbull: whether Australian emissions mattered, given growing emissions from China, India and the US. (US  emissions in fact are falling).

Turnbull: Well, if we don’t act, a wealthy advanced economy facing the harsh reality of climate change, if we don’t act and show leadership, why would anyone else act? 

Picture the scene: China’s Xi Jinping notices Australia’s self-sacrifice, and orders, ‘Communists, we must follow Australia’s example, whatever it costs us!’

Williams, stuck with rained-on ex-bushfires, finished her piece lugubriously, The music of the forest, in the middle of the Australian summer, is gone. Also gone: any faith in 60 Minutes’ credibility.

Read more at Spectator AU

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024
Energy

30-Plus Signs That The Climate Scam Is Collapsing

Apr 09, 2025

Comments 3

  1. McDaniel says:
    6 years ago

    I remember Gergis in this story.https://climateaudit.org/2016/07/21/joelle-gergis-data-torturer/

    Not a good look for a scientist to be caught data fiddlying.
    And Turbulls family(son) are “Co2 Traders” how ironic that they are trying to save the planet.

  2. Graham McDonald says:
    6 years ago

    “60 Minutes” is great, until they cover a subject that you have personal knowledge of. Then it’s “What the heck?” Back in the 70’s they did a segment on hunting (in the US) – I haven’t watched since.

    I have to assume that the factual accuracy of coverage of a subject that I’m interested in gives an indication of their accuracy on other subjects. I apply that test to all so-called news outlets. Some newspapers and magazines I still keep an eye on – the old adage – “Know your enemy”.

  3. Spurwing Plover says:
    6 years ago

    if you were to realy beleive a hing from the Crumby Broadcasting System and Sixty Minutes blaming Global Warming/Climate Change for the fires in Australia instead of the idiotic enviromental philosephies yeah 60 Minutes someone take hammer to their stopwatch

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • snowball earthA Climate Theory That Fits Every Outcome Now Warns Of An Ice Age
    Dec 29, 2025
    A new climate study claims global warming could trigger long-term cooling or an ice age, bolstering a theory that explains nearly every outcome. […]
  • trump worksite construction‘Build, Baby, Build’: What Trump’s Energy Revolution Will Deliver in Year Two
    Dec 29, 2025
    When it comes to energy policy, Trump’s Year Two agenda will build on 2025 gains with infrastructure, faster permitting, and more. […]
  • cruise ship open seaHawaii To Bilk Cruise Ship Passengers With 11% ‘Climate Tax’ Starting Jan. 1
    Dec 29, 2025
    Despite a pending lawsuit, Hawaii’s 11% cruise ship “Green Fee” climate tax will take effect Jan. 1., hitting passengers with steep new charges. […]
  • eagle deaths wind farmFederal Agency Sued For Withholding Wyoming Wind Farm Eagle Death Data
    Dec 29, 2025
    A conservation group is suing FWS for withholding Wyoming wind farm eagle death records, raising transparency and bird mortality concerns. […]
  • thune barrasso podiumThe Five Biggest Biden Regulations That Republicans Overturned In 2025
    Dec 29, 2025
    From EVs to coal to Alaska energy, lawmakers used the Congressional Review Act to wipe out onerous Biden rules. […]
  • hurricane eyeNo Storms, No Spin: A Quiet Hurricane Season That Even NOAA Missed
    Dec 26, 2025
    No U.S. landfalls and a near-normal hurricane season—Rigzone reported the data without forcing a climate narrative. […]
  • stacey abramsStacey Abrams-Linked Group Pocketed $5M Before Trump’s EPA Axed Climate Grant
    Dec 26, 2025
    Stacey Abrams-linked Rewiring America funneled $5M in federal climate funds before Trump’s EPA canceled the grant. […]
  • transmission lines grid electricityHouse Passes Energy Reliability Bill Aimed At Lowering Costs Nationwide
    Dec 26, 2025
    House passes bill to help states boost electricity reliability and lower energy costs, with some bipartisan support. […]
  • trump greets coal minersU.S. Coal Generation To Rise In 2026, Boosting Reliability And Lowering Prices
    Dec 26, 2025
    U.S. coal output is rising in 2025, helping keep electricity reliable and prices lower during winter demand spikes. […]
  • solar panel fieldGreen Energy’s Hidden Costs Are Wrecking Landscapes And Power Bills
    Dec 26, 2025
    Communities worldwide are pushing back as wind and solar projects drive up power bills, scar landscapes, and expose the real costs of green energy. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky