Greenhouse gas emissions continued to plummet during President Donald Trump’s first year in office, according to the new Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) data.
Based on data from more than 8,000 large facilities, EPA found greenhouse gas emissions, mostly carbon dioxide, fell 2.7 percent from 2016 to 2017.
Emissions from large power plants fell 4.5 percent from 2016 levels, according to EPA.
“Thanks to President Trump’s regulatory reform agenda, the economy is booming, energy production is surging, and we are reducing greenhouse gas emissions from major industrial sources,” EPA acting Administrator Andrew Wheeler said in a statement.
Earlier this year, the Energy Information Administration reported that per-capita greenhouse gas emissions hit a 67-year low during Trump’s first year in office.
EPA’s new data follows news that, globally, greenhouse gas emissions are set to rise to historic highs by the end of the year, despite nearly 200 countries signing the Paris climate accord. Global greenhouse gas emissions also rose in 2017.
China is the main culprit behind rising emissions, but India and other developing countries contribute.
However, recent reports have detailed how European countries aren’t on track to meet their own emissions reduction goals.
A recent report from the Climate Action Network Europe found that emissions cuts among most European Union members were “nowhere close enough” to meet the goals of the Paris accord.
Trump pledged to withdraw from the Paris accord at the earliest possibility, in 2020.
On the flip side, the U.S. led the world in emissions cuts for the ninth time this century, according to the oil giant BP’s annual energy statistics.
BP reported that European Union “emissions were also up (1.5%) with just Spain accounting for 44% of the increase.
German and French emissions increased 0.1 and 2 percent, respectively, last year, BP reported, while the “UK and Denmark reported the lowest carbon emissions in their history.”
Long held up as a poster child for fighting global warming, Germany is on track to miss its 2020 emissions targets. The government will likely instead push its goal of cutting CO2 emissions back to 2030.
Europe’s recent struggles with emissions cuts have emboldened supporters of Trump’s approach to emissions cuts, prioritizing private sector technology over government regulations.
“These achievements flow largely from technological breakthroughs in the private sector, not the heavy hand of government,” Wheeler said in a statement.
However, critics of the Trump administration’s deregulatory agenda say actions today will cause emissions to increase in the future.
Environmentalists and some states have sued to stop the administration rolling back Obama-era environmental regulations.
Democrats and environmentalists hope to use Trump’s rolling back of environmental regulations to drive voters to the polls in November.
“We know what everyone who wants to fight back must do: vote on November 6th. We know where the allegiances of Trump and his accomplices in Congress lie. Now it is up to us to make the change that is needed,” Sierra Club executive director Michael Brune said in a statement.
A major reason the U.S. has been able to cut emissions is the availability of low-priced natural gas.
In the last decade, drillers have been able to use hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling to unlock vast shale gas reserves.
Low-priced natural gas has replaced much U.S. coal-fired capacity in recent years, which has, in turn, lowered emissions.
Additions of wind and solar energy have also played a smaller role in reducing emissions.
“The Trump Administration has proven that federal regulations are not necessary to drive CO2 reductions,” Wheeler said. “While many around the world are talking about reducing greenhouse gases, the U.S. continues to deliver, and today’s report is further evidence of our action-oriented approach.”
Read more at Daily Caller
USA CO2 emission’s dropping ? Wow just imagine how Hillary would have played up her kill coal pledge . The deplorables have had enough but thanks Hillary for waking us up .
Eight years of Obama mush but at least he improved his golf game .
What Trump has exposed is the hard left the Democrats have taken .
Their new poster girl Cortez doesn’t just want to shut down coal she wants to shut down all fossil fuel . Deplorables are not interested in returning to being cave dwellers thanks . Who would have thought when Trump was elected that Bernie would appear to only be a nice little communist compared to the anarchists and pretend Indians of the hard left .
David Suzuki is a total nit-wit he sounds like your typical liberal thinks with his mouth not his brain
It is obvious that most people don’t know how the US is performing in comparison. Those who blame hurricanes on climate change (which is totally false) point to US policy where as other nations are not doing nearly as well in reducing the emissions of the harmless gas.
Even if carbon dioxide were a problem, the liberals would have a problem with Trump’s approach despite its success. His approach does not force de-industrialization, expand the power of government, provide an excuse for new taxes, transfer the wealth of industrial nations to developing nations, or destroy the free enterprise system.
All well and good – interesting statistics. The trends about CO2 (greenhouse gas) emissions would be really significant if carbon dioxide were actually important in current climate behavior, which we know it is not. What is truly good about this news is that it represents how the U.S. is leading the charge in ensuring a cleaner air and water. Funny how the alarmist are so concerned about the chemically inert gas and its imaginary effects on global temperatures but completely blind to the bigger picture of pollution, in general.
If the Leftwing cared about the environment rather than their political brainwashing, they’d do the right thing and vote for Trump; for he gets results.
https://twitter.com/ClimatePoet
And look at all those idiots blasting Trump for pulling America out of the Paris Accord and CNN calling him stupid will the stupid ones work for CNN and the New York Pravda(Times)and the various Eco-Wackos as well