• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Trudeau’s 2030 Prosperity Reduction Plan

by Ron Barmby, guest post
June 03, 2022, 10:45 AM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 8 mins read
A A
2

justin trudeauIn response to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s request for comments on the 2030 Emissions Reduction Plan: Canada’s Next Steps for Clean Air and a Strong Economy (2030 ERP), I wrote An Open Letter To PM Justin Trudeau On His Shambolic Emissions Plan. I received quite a few nice responses, but none from JT or his staff.

Undaunted, I’ll go deeper into why the 2030 ERP is shambolic. From an engineering perspective, it cannot achieve even a small fraction of its 40 to 45 percent lower CO2 equivalent emissions reduction target by 2030, which is a reduction of approximately 300 million tonnes.

It will adversely affect the prosperity of every Canadian. Meanwhile, China has announced another 150 million tonne increase for new coal-fired power generation and blast furnaces.

By adding energy costs that are not borne in other jurisdictions, our poor economic productivity relative to other countries will suffer even more.

Canada’s finance minister recently acknowledged the importance of productivity when she said, “Productivity matters because it is what guarantees the dream of every parent—that our children will be more prosperous than we are.”

The 2030 ERP divides the Canadian economy into seven sectors and stipulates emission reduction targets for each. We will examine the 2030 ERP in the three biggest emitting sectors, which account for 63 percent of Canada’s total emissions.

Oil and Gas

Two of the most important facts about the Canadian oil and gas industry are that it is now the fourth-largest producer in the world and that it can keep up this pace of production for at least another century. Along with the U.S., we are the only other oil and gas superpower that is a free democracy.

The industry produces 26 percent of Canada’s CO2 equivalent emissions or 191 million tonnes. The Trudeau government states it wants to keep the cash flowing while reducing the emissions by 42 percent before 2030.

The silver bullet suggested in the 2030 ERP is a technology called carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS), however, only carbon caption and storage (CCS) is practical when large volumes of CO2 are generated.

CCS requires separating and collecting CO2 from the burning or other uses of natural gas at atmospheric pressure and injecting it into underground permeable rock formations, similar to where the natural gas originated.

The separation of CO2 from the other waste gases is expensive, as is the energy and equipment needed to compress the CO2 gas into a liquid for deep underground injection.

A good example of CCS in operation is the new Quest project near Edmonton, Alberta. It stores approximately one million tonnes of CO2 per year; however, about 22 percent of the stored CO2 is generated by the CCS process itself.

The cost of CCS at Quest for the net amount of CO2 stored in 2020 (latest available) was $125 CAD per tonne.

Eliminating 42 percent of the Canadian oil and gas industry’s annual CO2 emissions, or 80 million tonnes, would cost $10 billion a year and require 100 Quest-sized projects (allowing for the CCS facilities’ own carbon dioxide emissions).

It is unrealistic to have that capacity by 2030 as it took six years to construct Quest.

Transportation

One-quarter of all Canada’s measured CO2 emissions are from transportation. This sector produces 186 million tonnes of CO2, and the government would like to reduce that by 23 percent.

The 2030 ERP focus includes technologies that are poorly suited to Canada, plus a truly inspiring level of greenwashing. These parallel a separate government plan to increase the carbon tax on fuel to 38 cents CAD per liter ($1.12 U.S. per U.S. gallon) by 2030.

The technology proposed is to mandate the purchase of Zero-Emission Vehicles (ZEVs), but they are unlikely to significantly reduce CO2 emissions.

The Canadian definition of a ZEV includes plug-in hybrids (the only type of hybrids that qualify as ZEVs) that can only go 27 km (17 miles) on a charge under ideal conditions before they need to switch to gasoline.

This means for the long driving distances between Canadian cities, the hybrid’s internal combustion engine would still overwhelmingly be the primary power source.

Plug-in hybrids are more expensive to purchase than conventional vehicles; the Toyota RAV4 plug-in hybrid is $16,000 (or 55 percent) more expensive than the base internal combustion model.

The second type of qualifying ZEV is fully electric battery vehicles. Independent testing suggests that during Canada’s cold, dark winters, the driving range should be derated by half. Otherwise, you could be stranded in the middle of a cold, dark place.

You can read more about ZEVs in my article Canada’s Zero-Emission Vehicles Mandate Is a Costly Political Ruse.

Ethanol Madness

The epic greenwashing part of reducing transportation emissions is the Clean Fuel Standard. It pushes the blending of even more ethanol into gasoline, which, contrary to claims by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), does not physically reduce CO2 emissions.

Laboratory testing by the U.S. Energy Information Administration confirms that when ethanol-blended gasoline is used, the same amount of CO2 is emitted for the same distance driven in the same car as regular gasoline.

The IPCC claims an offset, stating that the CO2 absorbed by photosynthesis to grow the corn to make the ethanol equals the amount of CO2 emitted when the ethanol is burned. There is a serious flaw in this logic.

The corn might have been grown anyway for food, and if not, some other crop would have been grown on that farmland. There is no increase in photosynthesis just because a crop became ethanol instead of food. Please refer to Why Ethanol In Gasoline Doesn’t Reduce CO2 Emissions.

The Canadian Clean Fuel Standard double-dips on greenwashing because much of the “offsetting” photosynthesis does not even happen in Canada. From the latest figures available (2019), 40 percent of the ethanol used in Canada was imported from the U.S.

A disturbing consequence of converting corn to ethanol for blending in gasoline—and its twin technology of converting soybeans to biodiesel—is that it drives up food prices, which hurts the world’s poor the hardest.

The war in Ukraine has already more than doubled the price of corn and soybeans compared to two years ago. On its own it is morally questionable to exacerbate hunger in developing countries by burning food in our vehicles; it is downright unconscionable when no physical reduction of carbon dioxide emissions is achieved.

Buildings

Twelve percent of Canada’s CO2 emissions come from buildings, and most are for heating spaces or water. The 2030 ERP calls for the current 91 million tonnes to be reduced by 37 percent or 38 million tonnes.

The only technically feasible way to decarbonize buildings in the next eight years is to completely electrify them from a non-emitting grid. Even if this were available the costs would be prohibitive to the average family.

In my city, the current cost of electricity is 11 cents per kWh and the cost of natural gas is $4.76 per GJ. We heat our homes and water with natural gas. Since a GJ is equivalent to 278 kWh, electricity is 6.4 times more expensive than natural gas on an energy-equivalent basis.

The 2030 ERP pushes heat pumps for space heat. Sales promotions claim that heat pumps are more efficient than natural gas. This is true only on an energy input basis, not on an energy cost basis.

Heat pumps are on average three times more efficient on an energy consumption basis than natural gas. That equates to heat pumps being twice as expensive to operate, or only half as efficient with your money.

On the same basis, a typical natural gas-fueled hot water tank consumes 35 percent more energy than the electric equivalent; therefore, a simple water heater would cost about 4.7 times more to heat with electricity than with gas.

The Prosperity Reduction Plan

The decades-long engine of growth of the Canadian economy, the oil and gas industry, will be hobbled by the high costs of CCS to meet CO2 emission limits.

High-paying jobs will disappear and the Canadian dollar will weaken, both of which will harm national prosperity. Our western allies’ energy security will be compromised while foreign dictator oil will benefit.

Transportation emissions are targeted by mandating sales of more expensive EVs, higher carbon taxes, and the phony Clean Fuel Standard. Plug-in hybrids will be operated mostly in the internal combustion mode as the battery mode is unsuited for Canada’s cold and vastness.

The driving range of 100-percent electric-battery vehicles will be another winter driving risk. Personal transportation will become so expensive that Canadians will have less freedom to travel.

Blending more ethanol into gasoline will not reduce CO2 emissions, but will reduce the amount of food the world’s poor can afford to buy.

The plan for reducing emissions in buildings appears to be to add carbon taxes to natural gas until it is no longer far cheaper than electricity. That’s a direct hit to every Canadian family’s prosperity for generations to come.

The 2030 ERP states that with increasing electrification of the economy—including transport and space heating—combined with the shutting down of fossil fuel electrical power generation, the non-emitting electrical generation will have to double or triple by 2050.

The report does not make a 2030 prediction, but a straight-line extrapolation suggests Canada needs to add between one-third and two-thirds more non-emitting electrical power by 2030.

Since our electrical power generation is already 82 percent non-emitting, that equates to increasing the total national power generating capacity by between 25 percent and 50 percent in the next eight years; all from non-emitting sources. This is another fantasy.

The 2030 Emissions Reduction Plan is shambolic because the technology offered is either too expensive, untested, or unobtainable on the scale and time frame proposed, or it does not physically reduce CO2 emissions on top of all those things. The plan would make no difference in the global atmosphere while creating economic hardship for Canadians.

No leader alert to his country’s national interests would allow it to happen.

Except Canada has Justin Trudeau.


Ron Barmby is a Professional Engineer with a Bachelor’s and Master’s degree, whose 40+ year career in the energy sector has taken him to over 40 countries on five continents. His book “Sunlight on Climate Change: A Heretic’s Guide to Global Climate Hysteria” (Amazon, Barnes & Noble) explains in understandable terms the science of how both natural and human-caused global warming work. Over two dozen other articles and presentations can be found at ronaldbarmby.ca. Please listen to Michael Parker and Joseph Arthur on TNT Radio – Today’s News Talk – Listen Live for interviews with Ron.

Permission to use this content is granted freely to all, provided that any such use is accompanied by author attribution and source link. —CCD Ed.

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024
Energy

30-Plus Signs That The Climate Scam Is Collapsing

Apr 09, 2025

Comments 2

  1. Allan Shelton says:
    3 years ago

    Nearly every intelligent and knowledgeable person know that CO2 does NOT cause global warming, but is plant food and more CO2 is beneficial to planet Earth.
    JT is simply regurgitating the left wing political agenda.
    He will never listen to reason or accept scientific facts about AGW.

    Reply
  2. Spurwing Plover says:
    3 years ago

    This dunderhead might as well drill anther hole in his rowboat over some water in the bottom all over the false crisis of Global Warming/Climate Change

    Reply

Comments are welcome! Those that add no discussion value may be removed.Cancel reply

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • oil rig drillAmerica’s Energy Boom Exposes The Folly Of Britain’s Net Zero Disaster
    Oct 3, 2025
    America’s energy boom and policy flexibility are widening the economic gap with Britain, where high prices and net zero goals are stalling growth. […]
  • Arctic sunsetNew Study Shows Arctic Sea Ice Decline Slowing, Driven More by Natural Variability Than Emissions
    Oct 3, 2025
    New study shows Arctic sea ice decline has slowed since 2012, driven more by natural variability than greenhouse gas emissions. […]
  • Attorney General Rob BontaNewsom Backs Off Climate Fight As AG Bonta Doubles Down On Suing Energy Firms
    Oct 3, 2025
    Two years after launching a high-profile climate lawsuit, Newsom is backing off while AG Rob Bonta doubles down on lawfare against major energy firms. […]
  • Farm irrigationMeteorologist Debunks Reuters’ Claim That Climate Change Threatens Europe’s Resources
    Oct 2, 2025
    Data show Europe’s droughts, weather, and biodiversity issues stem from mismanagement, not climate change, despite alarmist media claims. […]
  • Russ VoughtTrump Nixes $8B In ‘Green New Scam Funding’ In NYC, Blue States
    Oct 2, 2025
    Trump DOE halted billions in green energy projects citing poor economics, DEI hiring, and weak energy impact, sparking backlash in blue states. […]
  • SherrillRising Energy Costs And Dem Green Policies Top Of Mind In NJ Gubernatorial Race
    Oct 2, 2025
    New Jersey voters face rising energy costs as Democratic green policies and offshore wind expansion drive utility bills higher. […]
  • Hochul's green stringsHochul’s Election-Year ‘Inflation Refund’ Checks Can’t Cover Costs Of Her Green Agenda
    Oct 2, 2025
    Hochul’s election-year ‘inflation refund’ checks won’t offset the soaring living costs and utility hikes her green-energy agenda created. […]
  • South Asia monsoonSouth Asia Monsoons Not Becoming More Dangerous From Climate Change, Data Confirms
    Oct 1, 2025
    Claims that climate change is making South Asia’s monsoons more extreme ignore history, data, and other major causes of flooding. […]
  • wildfire carsRick Scott Wants Answers On What California Did With Federal Wildfire Funds
    Oct 1, 2025
    Sen. Rick Scott is demanding answers on how California spent federal money earmarked for preventing and fighting wildfires. […]
  • Biden test driving an all-electric Ford F-150.Ford CEO Warns U.S. EV Sales Could Halve After Federal Subsidies End
    Oct 1, 2025
    Ford warns U.S. electric vehicle sales could drop as much as 5% after the $7,500 taxpayer-funded federal subsidies expire in a month. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

very convenient warming

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Climate Change Dispatch

Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky