• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Toyota Announces Breakthrough In EV Battery Tech: 745-Mile Range

by Iulian Dnistran
July 20, 2023, 9:47 AM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
14

The Japanese automaker says it will soon be able to manufacture a solid-state pack that can charge in 10 minutes

Toyota claims it has made a technological breakthrough that will eventually lead to a solid-state battery capable of delivering up to 745 miles (1,199 kilometers) of range, all while completely recharging in 10 minutes, according to The Guardian, quoting Keiji Kaita, president of the company’s research and development center for ‘carbon neutrality’.

The Japanese car manufacturer said yesterday that it had simplified production of the material used to make both solid-state and liquid-based batteries, [allowing] it to halve the weight, size, and cost of the packs that end up in vehicles.

“For both our liquid and our solid-state batteries, we are aiming to drastically change the situation where current batteries are too big, heavy, and expensive,” said Kaita. “In terms of potential, we will aim to halve all of these factors.”

Solid-state batteries are seen as the logical next step in the development of EVs, as they are considered safer and more reliable than lithium-ion cells that use a liquid-based electrolyte, but at the same time, they’re much more expensive and harder to manufacture.

Several startups such as Solid Power, QuantumScape, Factorial, and StoreDot have been working to make solid-state batteries more affordable and easier to produce, but as of today, their products haven’t been fitted to any new EV sold on the market.

Now, however, Toyota says it believes it could simplify the manufacturing process, potentially making solid-state batteries easier to produce than lithium-ion ones.

Last month, the Japanese automaker – which is seen by many EV enthusiasts as a laggard when it comes to fully electrifying its lineup – unveiled a massive plan to change its focus from ICE vehicles to EVs, all while keeping hybrids, plug-in hybrids, and hydrogen-powered vehicles alive.

As part of its plan, Toyota wants to build an all-new EV-only architecture that will spawn a raft of new vehicles from 2026, including a US-made three-row SUV that will reportedly go into production in 2025 with batteries sourced from North Carolina.

Furthermore, the car group estimates that it will be able to make an advanced solid-state battery that’s capable of offering over 900 miles (1,448 km) of range after 2028, thanks in part to lighter, less complicated cars that have fewer components.

Top photo by Julius Tejeda

Read more at InsideEVs

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024
Energy

30-Plus Signs That The Climate Scam Is Collapsing

Apr 09, 2025

Comments 14

  1. Ralph says:
    3 years ago

    It’s still a fact that the faster you charge a battery the shorter the life of that battery by the heat created from the fast charge.

  2. Colin Joseph Harkin says:
    3 years ago

    I’m putting this artticle into the fake news bucket.

    Without a proven technology and test results from independent engineers, this is just talk.

    Toyota have disappointed me lately. The diesel engine in their new model Hi-Luxe isn’t so good these days. (The old models were very good) I know of a variety of mechanical problems as well as high fuel consumption but we never hear about solutions to these issues from Toyota.

    That said, I know this car maker is very capable which is proven by their past product sales success.

  3. Sonnyhill says:
    3 years ago

    I wonder if Toyota is stalling for time, giving the environmentalists false hope, to keep them off their back. Let Ford’s and GM’s big leaps of faith find the bottom. Nobody knows how deep the EV buyer pool is.

    • geoff bancroft says:
      3 years ago

      Yes it is just a spoiler campaign to make customers for lithium battery EVs hold off purchase because Toyota has something better…They do not.

  4. David Lewis says:
    3 years ago

    The claims being made by Toyota are indeed good news. I hope they come true. However, the old saying is if it is too good to be true, it probably isn’t real. Time will tell.

    One possibility is part of their solution is to make cars very small. These are adequate for a one person commute to work, but don’t work for families and might even be too small for a major grocery shopping trip.

    • Steve Bunten says:
      3 years ago

      The article did mention making a three-row SUV so they apparently aren’t planning on only “Smart Car” sized vehicles. But as you say, if it appears too good to be true it probably is.

  5. DGSchroder says:
    3 years ago

    Do the math on the charging rate. If you want to get enough power into a battery to move a vehicle 745 miles, and you want to get that power in a 10 minute period, the required load is somewhere around 7000 amps. Most homes have 100 amp service. Most small businesses have about 200 amp service. 7000 amps is a lot of power.

    • Sonnyhill says:
      3 years ago

      I didn’t do the math but I knew that was a lot of juice in a short amount of time. Big amperage requires big fat wires. You’re right. Hardly any home has access to that kind wattage.

      • DGSchroder says:
        3 years ago

        You brought up wire diameter. There is a formula for amperage load vs copper wire diameter. To get 7000 amps of power, you need to use 440 volt, 3 phase power. (Three phase power uses three cables plus a ground rather than two cables plus a ground). The copper core of each of the three cables needs to be 2.75 inches in diameter. Add insulation on each wire, a ground wire, and an outside covering, and the charging cable is over 6″ in diameter! (and is very heavy because most of it is copper)

        • Steve Pfeiffer says:
          3 years ago

          Important points! To add to what others have said:

          If we look at this in terms of the effect on the power infrastructure and power plants, we will use a “middle of the road” number of 3.5 miles per kWh for an EV.

          To get 745 miles of range would require a net input of 212 kWh in 10 minutes charge time.

          Including a modest charging loss of about 15% (to heat)…each charger would have a load of 1.5 megawatts.

          Consider that typical central station power plants are rated in the range of about 650 to 2500 megawattts, it would not take very many chargers to soak up the output of one large power plant.

        • Steve Pfeiffer says:
          3 years ago

          Good point, and most smaller commercial buildings, like convenience stores, gas stations, and small to medium office parks, are wire for 208 3 phase, not 480 3 phase…so the conductors get even bigger.

    • Steve Bunten says:
      3 years ago

      It would be amazing to have a battery that could move a vehicle 745 miles w/o a recharge. But agree with you about the 10 minute recharge. They gave no indication how that could be possible because of the amount of energy that needs to be pushed into this battery to move a some thousands of pounds of vehicle down the road that far.

    • Graham McDonald says:
      3 years ago

      “10 minutes”. They’re saying that this will compare with the time needed to fuel an ICE vehicle at a service station. Residential – will still take most of the night.

    • David Lewis says:
      3 years ago

      We are all reacting to the 10 minute charging claim for a battery that has a 745 mile range. My guess is this is sloppy communications from Toyota’s public relations department. What they might have meant that starting with a battery that is fully charged, then driving for a short trip to commute to work or go shopping, the battery could be brought back to a full charge in 10 minutes.

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • thune presserGOP Allowed Groundwork For Carbon Tax To Slip Into Funding Bill, Opponents Warn
    Feb 5, 2026
    Opponents warn language in a new funding bill could lay groundwork for future carbon taxes by directing an Energy Department emissions review. […]
  • va capitol cash grabBipartisan Lawmakers Kill Climate Superfund Bill In Virginia
    Feb 5, 2026
    Bipartisan Virginia lawmakers blocked a climate superfund bill, citing retroactive liability and due-process concerns. […]
  • chris wrightIf Your Power Bill Is Sky-High, Thank Your State Leaders
    Feb 5, 2026
    High power bills aren’t bad luck or market forces — they’re the result of political decisions made by clueless blue state leaders. […]
  • bullet train coming soonCalifornia Dems To Hide High-Speed Rail Records As Costs And Delays Mount
    Feb 5, 2026
    California’s bullet train moves to track-laying—years late, billions over budget, and on a fraction of the promised route, as transparency questions grow. […]
  • winter olympics 2026Olympian-Level Dumb: WashPost Cries Climate Change Making ‘Winter Olympics Harder To Host’
    Feb 5, 2026
    Fresh snow in Italy and deep cold elsewhere undercut claims that climate change is making the Winter Olympics harder to host. […]
  • global temp measuringHow Erased Heatwaves And Altered Data Underpin The Global Temperature Record
    Feb 4, 2026
    Claims of a climate crisis rest on the assumption that scientists have a precise understanding of global temperature, past and present. Do they? […]
  • africa river basinMedia Invokes Climate Bogeyman To Explain Africa’s Recurring Weather
    Feb 4, 2026
    Africa’s droughts and floods are recurring weather events, not proof of a climate shift, despite media claims to the contrary. […]
  • polar bears arcticBiologists Let Attenborough Push False Starvation Claims About Barents Sea Bears
    Feb 4, 2026
    A 2011 Frozen Planet episode warned of starving polar bears in the Barents Sea despite evidence they were healthy. […]
  • gavel earth lawsuitsState AGs Seek Investigation Of Alleged Climate Bias Influencing Federal Judges
    Feb 3, 2026
    Twenty-two state attorneys general urge the House to investigate alleged climate bias influencing federal judges. […]
  • computer screen modeling failureWhen Assumptions Replace Evidence In Climate Science
    Feb 3, 2026
    In its latest scientific manual for judges, the Federal Judicial Center promotes climate attribution methods over real-world testing. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky