• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Three Real Planetary Threats That Have Nothing To Do With CO2

by Dr. Joel H. Glass, guest post
February 10, 2020, 1:41 PM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
6

asteroid meteor impactThere are about 11 or 12 years left before the planet is destroyed by CO2 according to the climate change doomsters.

In fact, there are several very real threats to the existence of human life on Earth.

None of which have anything to do with CO2 or human activity related to climate.

Here are just three actual threats:

One is an asteroid striking the Earth. There have been several near misses in the last 100 years and we happen to be located near an asteroid belt.

That means the possibility of a direct hit is very strong. And we’re long overdue for an extinction-level event.

Another existential threat is disease. Already, pandemics have wiped out major percentages of the human population.

In 1347, the Bubonic plague (a bacterial infection) struck Europe and Asia, killing about one-third of the population.

In 1918, a virulent flu virus killed up to 100 million people and sickened many more. This existential threat is not eliminated by “modern” medicine, and the Wuhan coronavirus epidemic is an example.

Far from being protected from pandemics by modern society and technology, the infrastructure for a pandemic has become worse. A virus can quickly travel around our connected world.

In addition, compact human populations in urban centers, transportation systems, workplaces, and so on mean greater opportunity for a virus that is transmissible from person to person.

As of press time, some 500,000 people in China were infected with the coronavirus. The infected group doubles every 6.4 days. Do that math.

This is disturbing because these are in fact not numbers, they are people. Living in fear, suffering terribly from the disease, with many dying. It’s a true catastrophe and tragedy.

Contrast this to the CO2 deception, and it’s clear the fraud has to be stopped.

A third example of actual threats is nuclear war. Nuclear-weapon technology is spreading everywhere and will soon be in the hands of apocalyptic regimes such as Iran. The possibility of nuclear conflict increases.

Destruction from nuclear conflict would go beyond the actual damage from the blast, heat, radiation, and shockwaves.

Soot and other burned particles blown into the stratosphere would create something called a nuclear winter. Dark clouds of solid pollutants could cover the Earth, blocking out the sun.

Temperatures could plummet and plants (food crops) would wither from a lack of sunlight and frigid soil. Human life could be extinct in a single generation.

With all these real threats facing the planet, over $100 billion in research and various climate programs is being spent yearly on programs to demonize CO2.

A molecule that has zero effect on climate and is beneficial to life on Earth, particularly plant life. Resources should be used to combat real threats, not imaginary ones.

This misallocation of resources is going on because the climate change movement has nothing to do with climate.

It’s a political and financial power grab based on sowing panic and chaos about something that does not exist. As a result, resources that could be used to avoid or mitigate actual existential threats to our planet are being spent on witch hunts.

Organizations funded by climate billionaires fuel the fraud and divert resources from where it’s needed to where it’s not.

Let’s dispense with the climate fraud quickly: About 3% of the atmosphere is composed of greenhouse gasses. Of the greenhouse gasses, about 3% is CO2. And of the total CO2 produced every year on Earth, only about 2% is the result of human activity.

The rest comes largely from microorganisms, which produce nine times as much CO2 as all human activity combined. If human activity ended, as proposed by activists like Greta Thunberg and Ocasio-Cortez, the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere would remain basically the same.

In addition, in terms of physics, the CO2 molecules can hold heat for only 0.0001 of a second, making it impossible to act as a factor in measurable greenhouse warming effects.

It would, therefore, be fair for any reasonable person to make the argument that those involved in the man-made global warming fraud are knowingly or unknowing destroying the planet by wasting needed time and resources on a non-existent threat.


For those interested in getting themselves or their loved ones free from the global warming fraud, get the new book ICE AGE 2025: HOW TO PREPARE AMERICA AND YOUR FAMILY by Joel Glass.

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024
Energy

30-Plus Signs That The Climate Scam Is Collapsing

Apr 09, 2025

Comments 6

  1. David Lewis says:
    6 years ago

    Pandemics have killed millions and future ones could be worse, though this isn’t likely. However, one thing that all pandemics have in common is that our civilization survives.

    Nuclear winter was invented by Carl Sagan in an effort to force nuclear disbarment. Like climate change it was politically motivated junk science. Meteorologist did the calculations and a full nuclear exchange between the United States and the Soviet Union would not have stirred up enough debris to cause a nuclear winter. Any nuclear war that we might see in the future would be much smaller. Such a war is still very undesirable, but one thing we don’t have to worry about is a nuclear winter.

  2. Boxorox says:
    6 years ago

    Hold on here.
    Nobody is more anti-Global Warming mania than I am. I am fully committed to stoping the climate-crisis campaign in any way that I can.
    But I really have to take issue with the 3 Threats to Earth you cite, because these claims represent fear-mongering on an equal though opposite scale. The only one of these which stands to come within the likelihood of occurence in the next century is the disease aspect; however the coronavirus is probably not the one to worry about.
    The idea that an asteroid impact can not actually destroy earth but certainly cause global hardship on our civilization is an area of study for me over the past two decades. You cite that the fact that we live near an asteroid belt as an illustration of the threat, but this asteroid belt is not where the next killer meteor will arise. There are thousands of sizable near-Earth asteroids which orbit the sun and come across Earth’s orbit, on the order of about one per day, so asking us to worry about the asteroid belt shows me a lack of understanding and an attempt to grasp at straws to fight the global warming faction. We can rely on better claims than this.
    Global warming is just plain stupid. Climate changes all the time, as in it varies for any of several natural reasons and humans have no impact on these forces. Let’s stick to real facts and valid claims to keep the climate crisis nut-jobs out of our way.

    • Anasole says:
      6 years ago

      I think the author was pointing out that those three examples are REAL threats, even if they are highly unlikely. If you’re going to spend $100’s of billions on a threat that has no chance of EVER manifesting, why not spend it on a threat that actually has odds of happening Currently, the odds of the Apophis asteroid striking the Earth on it’s next pass in 2036 is about 1 in 250,000, as compared to a 1 in never for the Earth becoming uninhabitable due to man-made CO2.

  3. M Montgomery says:
    6 years ago

    What about EMP’s? I haven’t heard anything about an improvement to the security of our grids, and I’m sure our enemies would love to take revenge on us in such a way.

  4. JayPee says:
    6 years ago

    If the mythical so-called ” Greenhouse Effect ”
    were a fact, then all that the alarmists would have to do is

    parade out the

    THERMAL INFRARED SPECTROGRAHIC

    data that would conclusively prove their hypothesis.

    THAT’S ALL THEY WOULD HAVE TO DO !!

    They have not done this AND

    They will not do this

    BECAUSE

    Thermal Infrared Spectrography
    conclusively

    PRIOVES THEM WRONG !

  5. Spurwing Plover says:
    6 years ago

    What ever happened with the Killer African Bees we were hearing so much about in the 1970’s? I do remember all this Killer Bees stuff and they made movies like The Swarm We hear no more about Killer Bees

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • COP30 Amazon17 Republican AGs Urge Trump Admin To Skip COP30 Over Green Energy Policies
    Oct 24, 2025
    The attorneys general say attending COP30 would back costly, unreliable wind and solar and risk U.S. energy security. […]
  • severe storm over cityClimate Expert Reveals Latest Scandal Tied To Billion-Dollar Disasters
    Oct 24, 2025
    Climate Central takes over the Billion-Dollar Disasters tabulation, sparking fresh controversy over its methods and motives. […]
  • ocean sun cloudsNew Study Finds 75% Of Rising Ocean Heat Likely Natural, CO2 Not A Factor
    Oct 24, 2025
    Study shows ocean warming driven mostly by natural cycles, not greenhouse gas emissions, challenging mainstream global warming narratives. […]
  • LNG terminal in germanyU.S. And Qatar Push Back On EU’s Climate Mandates That Threaten LNG Exports
    Oct 24, 2025
    U.S. and Qatari officials warn that the EU’s latest climate regulations under CSDDD could endanger Europe’s access to affordable natural gas. […]
  • marines trainingCrazy Hill Op-Ed Demands Generals Respond To Climate Change ‘National Security’ Threat
    Oct 23, 2025
    The Hill warns of climate Armageddon unless U.S. generals join the fight against ‘Mother Nature,’ now deemed a national security threat. […]
  • Shipping port near power plantEurope’s Energy Crisis Shows Net Zero Dogma Comes At A Cost
    Oct 23, 2025
    While China’s rare earth threat exposes U.S. supply chain risks, Europe’s energy crisis shows how net zero policies backfired spectacularly. […]
  • wind farm climate outDemocrats Ditch Climate Messaging As Rising Utility Costs Hit Voters
    Oct 23, 2025
    As Democrats struggle with climate messaging, voters feel the pinch from rising utility bills and the party's costly green energy policies. […]
  • Protest system change not climate changeLead Attorney Admits Real Goal Of Climate Lawsuits: Backdoor Carbon Tax
    Oct 23, 2025
    A top lawyer spearheading climate lawsuits says the quiet part out loud: litigation is a backdoor carbon tax on oil companies and consumers. […]
  • WMO reportHow The World Meteorological Organization Lies To You—Using Your Taxes
    Oct 22, 2025
    The WMO’s 2025 greenhouse gas report hides key data that undercuts the so-called climate 'crisis' narrative—funded by your tax dollars. […]
  • Hurricane generating ocean waves2025 Hurricane Season Is Flopping As Alarmist Predictions Fail
    Oct 22, 2025
    The 2025 hurricane season so far has seen no major U.S. landfalls, exposing alarmists’ failed predictions of catastrophic storms. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky