Environmental activists are very concerned that Justice Kavanaugh’s appointment to the Supreme Court is going to seriously jeopardize their green agenda.
Inside Climate News reports:
In his dozen years on the federal appeals court that hears the most disputes over government regulatory power, Judge Brett Kavanaugh compiled an extensive record of skepticism toward the government’s powers to act on climate change.
In particular, while Kavanaugh has repeatedly voiced the belief that global warming is a serious problem, he challenged the argument that Congress has given the Environmental Protection Agency authority to do something about it.
That means the 53-year-old jurist, who was confirmed on a 50-48 vote by the U.S. Senate on Oct. 6 and sworn in to replace Justice Anthony Kennedy on the U.S. Supreme Court, could harden the high court for the next generation as a blockade to climate action that isn’t explicitly mandated by Congress.
With a track record like this against the Green Blob, Kavanaugh will have made himself a powerful enemy.
The global warming industry is estimated to be worth upwards of an annual $1.5 trillion.
Earlier this week, the IPCC urged that a minimum $2.4 trillion be spent each year on the problem.
It is more than possible that the shrill, aggressive and well-funded opposition to Kavanaugh’s appointment stemmed in part from the many powerful vested interests which profit from this ‘Climate Industrial Complex’.
Kavanaugh was instrumental in striking down some of the more extreme climate regulation that Obama tried to push through in the dog days of his second term.
Kavanaugh articulated his narrow reading of the law during oral arguments in September 2016 on the Clean Power Plan. Kavanaugh said the Clean Air Act was “a thin statute” to support the rule, likening the program for reining in carbon emissions from electric power plants to President George W. Bush’s post-9/11 move to detain a suspected enemy combatant without due process—an effort that the Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional.
“War is not a blank check,” Kavanaugh said. “Global warming is not a blank check, either, for the president.”
Kavanaugh also wrote the majority opinion last year striking down another important Obama climate rule—EPA’s regulation of HFCs, potent greenhouse gases used in cooling—as outside the agency’s authority under the Clean Air Act.
“EPA’s well-intentioned policy objectives with respect to climate change do not on their own authorize the agency to regulate,” Kavanaugh wrote. “… Congress’s failure to enact general climate change legislation does not authorize EPA to act. Under the Constitution, congressional inaction does not license an agency to take matters into its own hands, even to solve a pressing policy issue such as climate change.”
He is also very much in tune with his president’s view that business and the economy should take precedence over green virtue-signaling.
Kavanaugh also has expressed concern over whether the EPA is sufficiently weighing the cost to business in decisions to benefit the environment, as in a dissenting opinion against the agency’s withdrawal of a Clean Water Act permit for a coal operation.
Similarly, in a 2014 dissent about EPA’s regulations governing mercury emissions from coal plants, Kavanaugh said the agency should have considered the costs when considering at the outset whether it was even appropriate to control the pollutant, a powerful neurotoxin that can cause developmental disorders and other ailments.
And he has written, much as has Trump’s first Supreme Court nominee, Justice Neil Gorsuch, that courts should give less deference to federal agencies where the law is ambiguous—a principle that has governed federal administrative law for 30 years.
“The takeaway message,” said Ann Carlson, director of UCLA School of Law’s Emmett Institute on Climate Change, writing on the institute’s blog, “is that he will construe EPA authority very narrowly and virtually always, but not every single time, in favor of regulated parties and against environmental interests.”
We knew that Kavanaugh’s appointment to the Supreme Court was an important MAGA victory. That victory just got biglier still.
Read more at Breitbart
The hardline Greens are just afraid Kavanaugh will rule against their suing private propoerty owners and block wildlife agents from tresspassing on private property so to find some teenie weenie snail listed as Endangered and confiscate the farmers tractor over this all especialy those Eco-Nazis from Earthjustice or the Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund
The environmental left is completely devoid of ethics. The proper and ethical way to pursue this agenda is to have legislative bodies pass law implementing their goals. If they can’t get the legislation passed, they see nothing wrong with moving on to unethical means. An example of this is Obama’s over reach executive orders where a justice such as Kavanaugh is bad news for this sort of thing since he will rule against those exceeding his authority. If the environmental left can’t get what they want with overing reach executive orders, then they fill law suits in an attempt to enact what is called judicial legislation. It is certain that Kavanaugh will rule against this type of action. It is little wonder that there was such a massive effort to block his confirmation.
They should be afraid of Kavanaugh. He won’t be bullied and he can do his own fact checks . The Club of Rome is seeing their world government plans crumbling and they will stop at nothing to get rid of him .
The ” green ” agenda can be derailed by nothing more than
The Scientific Method and
Logic and
Recognition that the laws of Thermodynamics
are still valid.
To accept the green agenda
you must throw to the wind
the laws of thermodynamics
the Scientific Method
and any pretense of logic.
The watermelons are just afraid Kavanaugh will rule against their stupid lawsuits they file all the time the only green they like has big $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ all over it and their favorite Wildlife are the ones that appear in the desinger checks sent to them by the usial suckers to buy up their Malarkey and recite Al Bores idiotic poem
Chillin Dillan 1992 UN CLIMATE SUMMIT achieved CONSENSUS in 192 countries that allowed UN control of education & media to SOCIALLY ENGINEER SOCIETY to believe what isn’t true (for UN control) & not believe what is true (enabling UN control of our LAND, AIR, WATER rights & freedom). So today we have a generation of indoctrinated 1992 UN CLIMATOLOGIST GLOBALISTs that are robotic followers & ask no questions. They believe the earth is overpopulated, that homosexuality is normal (UN population control), vaccines (full of toxins for population reduction), there is no cure for cancer (#1 population reducer also side effect of vaccines is some). Easiest way for control of the earth is as planned by the UN globalist elites was and is through CLIMATE CHANGE ALARMISM, DIABOLICALLY BRILLIANT plan used to give OUR WORLD over to the UN ELITE. As for Nobel prizes for unscientific CLIMATE CHANGE done with CONSENSUS is there any doubt we are being HOODWINKED by the wealthy global elite? I NEVER argue THE FACTS BUT USE THEM AGAINST UN NO MINDEDNESS. Your reaction is identical to many in the ZOMBIE APOCALYPSE created by the UN to destroy. THANK YOU you’re brilliantly insane so support UN CONSENSUS SCIENCE. The taller the climate change tale the higher the UN bonuses. Your mind is set from the post 1992 UN CLIMATE SUMMIT when the UN finally gained CONSENSUS from 192 countries permitting UN control of education & media to program society to believe what isn’t true & unable to believe what is true. SOUNDS LIKE YOU TO ME! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RM–CB0zBrw&t=50s
UNITED NATIONS AGENDA 21/30 IS ELITE MASTER PLAN FOR WORLD GENOCIDE, ALL ABORIGINALS MUST RESIST IT & THE COMMON CORE EDUCATION BEING USED TO GET IT. PLEASE PASS THIS ON I AM 1 IN AN IGNORANT WORLD THAT NEEDS TO WAKE UP!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d9X0_invucs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJkKb1W1Pbo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SJ0TZJ867U0
COMMON CORE IS TIED TO UNITED NATIONS!
UN IS CANCER TO HUMANITY!
Maybe we can get the SCOTUS to readdress the ruling that the EPA can regulate CO2 under the guise that it’s a pollutant under the Clean Air Act. Given his opinions on the Circuit Court it would seem he’d come to the same conclusion on CO2 as well.
We can only hope!