• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

The Costly (And Foolish) Fantasy Of Closing Coal Plants

by Frank Lasee
January 12, 2023, 1:16 PM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 5 mins read
A A
10
Share on FacebookShare on XwitterShare on Linkedin

granholm solarLegislators in Michigan have joined President Biden and the green blob in the fantasy of forcing a 100% renewable transition. That would mean wind, solar, and batteries for our electric grids and more demand from electric vehicles.

Biden has promised to end all coal-electric plants and now some states are also attempting to do this. This net-zero goal by 2030 or 2050 will not happen. In fact, it is crazy expensive and not doable in the real world. [emphasis, links added]

Never mind that the Communist Chinese, our biggest rivals, are massively expanding their coal mining and electricity plants.

Or that Germany is taking down wind towers to expand a coal mine and has reopened numerous coal plants before and after the Russian invasion. 

India, now the most populous country in the world, is growing their coal use, reopening and building more mines and coal-electric plants.

Some quick math. In 2021, wind provided 7% of Michigan’s electricity, and coal supplied 32%. Coal provided 4.5 times as much as wind.

We simply multiply the 1,600 wind towers in Michigan by 3.5 for the 5,600 towers needed to replace coal.

Source: Wikipedia List of Power Stations in Michigan

Coal provides on-demand power when needed, but wind cannot. Building more wind and solar doesn’t solve the when-the-wind-blows or sun shines part-time problem.

Electric grids need to meet demand with supply at all times, or we have blackouts; often when it is really cold or really hot. Batteries are wildly expensive and can’t store electricity for the months needed for a 100% renewable grid.

Nor is there a supply chain for millions of EVs and industrial at-scale batteries made with metals mined with child labor in Africa, refined with slave labor in China, and with devastating environmental costs.

This renewable transition is not green.

These 5,600 wind towers aren’t going to appear anytime soon. It takes years to site, build, and connect wind towers and solar panels. And it will cost about $15 billion or more, not including transmission wires and batteries.

There aren’t that many windy places left in Michigan. Local wind conditions make a huge difference in energy generation and many places just don’t have enough wind to make a 70-story wind tower financially viable.

Closing any coal plant before replacement power is online is stupid. Our experts have failed us by putting us in the blackout danger zone by allowing reliable, affordable, clean coal plants to be closed, leaving us short of electricity.

The solar transition is even worse. Solar only produces power 18% of the time in Michigan. It takes more solar panels than you think to replace full-time coal plants.

By the way, 180 days of coal can be stored onsite at a reasonable cost. Only batteries can store solar for short periods of time.

It will take about 180 square miles of solar panels, about 50 million panels just to replace Michigan’s coal. This isn’t happening anytime soon. What about all the orchards, farmland and forests cut down for panels?

The easiest, low-cost places to put solar panels are in flat open farm fields. We are on the verge of hundreds of millions of starving people and we’re going to cover good farmland with solar panels? This isn’t wise. And it will drive up food costs for everyone.

Solar panels warm the air above them by 20° to 30°. 180 square miles will make a lot of heat. We will warm the earth, to cool the earth, in order to save the Earth from warming.

That’s more upside-down progressive thinking, all to arguably stop disasters that may or may not happen 50 or 100 years from now.

Disaster trends are non-existent for floods and droughts and trend down for tornadoes and hurricanes. In addition, CO2 is necessary plant food that is greening the world, including deserts. Greenhouses add CO2 to make plants grow bigger and faster.

In the whole country, we are installing about 3,500 wind towers a year. Jamming 5,600 in Michigan or 200,000 new wind towers across the country will be an unpopular move. Building thousands of square miles of solar panels will be unpopular and unwise.

Michigan and Biden’s energy transition is going to be slow, painful, and expensive. We need some reality, not fantasy.

We need real-world cost and feasibility studies. There is not a single place in the United States that has a 100% renewable electric grid. No government has put a pen to paper and offered a plan or provided the real cost. It will be shocking.

Sensible people need to slow this all down and learn lessons from Europe and China.

Read more at RealClearEnergy

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Skype
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky

Join our list

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.

We respect your privacy and take protecting it seriously

Related Posts

Energy

Report: Biden Likely Unaware Of Harmful Climate Policies His Admin Churned Out

May 28, 2025
Electric Vehicles (EVs)

GM Dumps EV Plan, Pours $888M Into V8 Engines After Biden Mandates Scrapped

May 28, 2025
News and Opinion

Predictive? Study Finds IPCC Climate Models Overstate Warming Up To 4.5°F

May 28, 2025

Comments 10

  1. f6k6Y says:
    2 years ago
  2. Spurwing Plover says:
    2 years ago

    It would be far better off if we just closed down the whole United Nations and move the whole lot to Moscow without America

  3. Randy Verret says:
    2 years ago

    Unfortunately, I have reached the conclusion that most folks in the “political class,” whether they be Democrats (especially) or Republicans are for the most part, functionally ILLITERATE in MATH & science. How can you have a rational debate on climate & attendant environmental policy when you don’t even have a minimal baseline of knowledge? Somehow, this conversation needs to change. Otherwise, all I can tell you is energy POVERTY will not be a good look…

    • Sonnyhill says:
      2 years ago

      I’ll add that the voters are just as clueless, and worse yet, careless. They take today’s prosperity for granted when they should be defending it.

      • Randy Verret says:
        2 years ago

        Yep. An uninformed & disengaged electorate is not helpful.

  4. Alan Stewart says:
    2 years ago

    It would be interesting to ask the loons with their cyanoacrylate slathered hands for an ordered list of precisely what in the future climate is going to kill all life on earth. I will guarantee that 99.9 repeater % have zero education in science, let alone those relating to climate. The same should be asked of the apocryphal 97% of scientists who believe in the AGW/CC THEORY.
    I would expect vapid, incoherent angry answers, including the buzzword, racist, from the 1st group and dead silence from the 2nd group.

    • Alan Bland says:
      2 years ago

      The insistence that “97% of scientists believe in the AGW/CC theory” is one of the many lies endlessly repeated in the mainstream media. Most scientists aren’t qualified in climatology, so their opinion is little better than anyone else’s. But many climatologists and meteorologists who are qualified have serious doubts. The current CO2 concentration in the atmosphere is 420 ppm, which means it constitutes only 0.042% of the atmosphere. There is much more Argon (a relatively rarified gas) in the atmosphere. Most of the CO2 in the atmosphere is NATURAL and has been part of the Earth’s carbon cycle for billions of years. All plant life depends on it and therefore everything else in the food chain. More CO2 is a good thing. If it were to drop to 150 ppm, plants would stop being able to photosynthesize and we’d all starve. Instead, an increasing concentration will improve crop yields and help in feeding the world’s expanding population. And by the way, those crops also need artificial fertilizer, which comes from fossil fuels. The green mafia wants to ban them all. They must be psychotic.

  5. Ed Reid says:
    2 years ago

    It would be wise to conduct a demonstration of a renewable plus storage grid before committing to it on a national basis.
    https://www.therightinsight.org/Renewable-Demonstration
    https://www.therightinsight.org/Transparency
    https://www.therightinsight.org/Demonstration-Reporting
    It wouldn’t be easy or cheap; and, it likely would not be successful.

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • Biden signs executive orderReport: Biden Likely Unaware Of Harmful Climate Policies His Admin Churned Out
    May 28, 2025
    Who’s really behind Biden’s energy agenda? Major executive orders reshaping U.S. policy were never publicly addressed by the president himself. […]
  • Biden visits GM EV plantGM Dumps EV Plan, Pours $888M Into V8 Engines After Biden Mandates Scrapped
    May 28, 2025
    GM pivots NY plant from EV parts to V8 engines as GOP, Trump EPA dismantle Biden’s electric vehicle push and California’s EV mandate. […]
  • earth sunrisePredictive? Study Finds IPCC Climate Models Overstate Warming Up To 4.5°F
    May 28, 2025
    New study finds IPCC climate models overstate warming nearly 4.5°F, with benchmark models proving far more accurate in long-term forecasts. […]
  • Government Accountability OfficeSenate GOP Accuses Govt Watchdog Of Trying To Save California EPA Waiver
    May 28, 2025
    Republicans are criticizing the GAO for showing bias and overstepping its bounds in trying to stop Congress from repealing California’s EPA waiver. […]
  • NYC traffic congestionFederal Judge Blocks Trump’s Bid To Kill NYC Congestion Toll
    May 28, 2025
    A federal judge blocked Trump’s bid to kill NYC’s congestion toll, preserving New York’s climate law and traffic-cutting program—for now. […]
  • Gavin Newsom PresserGavin Newsom Is Seething After Congress Repealed California’s Gas Car Ban
    May 27, 2025
    Gov. Newsom is steamed after Congress repealed a Biden EPA waiver letting California ban gas-powered cars and said he'll fight back. […]
  • Capitol Hill DCCongress Resurrects Fight Against The Climate Cult’s Regulatory Assault
    May 27, 2025
    Congress eyes bills to rein in climate overreach, challenge secret science, and expose hypocrisy fueling the elite-driven climate change narrative. […]
  • mosquitoNo, Climate Change Isn’t Behind Britain’s Mosquito Fears
    May 27, 2025
    The Guardian asserts that climate change will make the UK more hospitable to mosquito-borne diseases, ignoring established drivers. […]
  • wind turbine blades landfill‘Green’ Waste Piles Up As Solar Panels And Wind Turbines Pollute Landfills
    May 27, 2025
    Solar and wind waste is piling up with no clear plan for disposal, raising new questions about the cost of going green and the myth of net zero. […]
  • new orleans blackoutMISO Ignored Warnings Before Holiday Blackout Left Blue City In The Dark
    May 27, 2025
    Nearly 100,000 lost power in New Orleans after MISO cut the grid, raising alarm over blackout risk tied to green energy replacing coal and gas. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts by email either instantly or daily. Check your Junk folder for any verification emails upon subscribing.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books We Like

very convenient warming

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

Share via
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Climate Change Dispatch