Tesla’s business model is unique in many respects. From its reliance on green energy credits to its frantic pursuit of self-driving technology, there are many things that make the automaker stand out in the industry.
But one of the company’s lesser-known idiosyncrasies is that it only sells its vehicles directly to customers. It never goes through third-party dealerships.
The problem for Tesla is that many states prohibit or severely limit this practice, meaning Tesla owners often have to drive to a different state to buy and service their vehicles.
Recently, however, Tesla found a creative solution to this problem in New Mexico.
“Tesla has opened its first store and repair shop on Native American land,” the New York Post reports, “dodging car dealership laws that have stymied its expansion plans across the country. The Elon Musk-helmed carmaker opened a store and service center [in] Nambé Pueblo, a tribal area about 25 minutes north of Santa Fe that is not subject to laws that have prevented Tesla from opening stores elsewhere [in] the state.”
“The New Mexico store marks the first time Tesla has worked with a tribe to get around state dealership laws,” the report continues. “Until now, New Mexico Tesla buyers had to pay thousands of dollars to have their cars shipped or travel to other states to pick them up. For repairs, owners had to travel to service centers in Colorado, Arizona, or Texas.”
The Perils of Protectionism
While this workaround is laudable and honestly kind of funny, the fact that it was necessary in the first place is concerning.
Though the laws prohibiting direct sales are sold as a way to protect auto dealerships from larger, opportunistic manufacturers, what’s really happening is that dealerships are being protected from competition.
As in all other industries, the established players don’t like to be challenged. Franchise dealerships see automakers like Tesla as a threat to their business model, and rightly so.
But rather than striving to outdo Tesla in serving customers and creating value, they have simply asked politicians to make it illegal for Tesla to compete.
And since politicians always seem to have a soft spot for special interest groups, they have often been happy to oblige.
But these laws don’t just hurt automakers like Tesla. They also hurt consumers, who have fewer options in their local area as a result and have to sacrifice lots of time and effort if they really want a Tesla.
Just imagine what it must have been like to be a Tesla owner in New Mexico. You had to drive all the way to Arizona for a simple repair, not because that makes any sense whatsoever, but just because the local dealerships didn’t want the competition.
It’s exactly that kind of needless inefficiency that free-market advocates decry when we talk about crony, protectionist policies.
Cronyism aside, what’s beautiful about this story is how it perfectly exemplifies the persistence of the market. Even in the face of crushing prohibitions, businesses will exploit every loophole and oversight to create value for consumers (and profit for themselves).
Entrepreneurs do not sit around idly waiting for the law to change. They innovate, they adapt, they find workarounds, anything to get valuable goods and services to eager customers.
Of course, sometimes these workarounds need to be very creative, like putting a store and repair shop on Native American land. But creative workarounds like this are nothing new.
Read rest at FEE
Henry Ford owned Ford production from the iron ore and coal mines, power stations etc. etc. all the way through to the dealerships.
This made Ford cheaper than the competition which lobbied the government to impose anti-trust legislation – primarily at the behest of the Dodge brothers and GM – thus have Ford forced to break up his “monopoly”, which it was not !
My Oxford English dictionary gives the following definition :-
Monopoly – “Exclusive possession of the trade in some commodity;
This conferred as privilege by the State.”
NOTE: CONFERED AS PRIVILEGE BY THE STATE
Contrary to popular opinion, monopolies do not exist in free markets, it is simply impossible. The moment any business starts to make above normal profits in a free market, others move in and competition does the rest.
However when the State grants control of a commodity to an individual (or cartel) then no one can compete (legally). This is a true monopoly.
The US anti-trust legislation essentially entrenches monopolistic practices rather than eliminating them.
And this arrogant old Peacock sits on the top of the roost and sneers down upon the rest of those Birds sitting on the bottom of the roost