• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Trump Is Right — Subsidies For Electric Cars, Renewable Energy Must End

by IBD
December 05, 2018, 4:11 PM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
3

electric cars charging stationPresident Trump’s economic adviser Larry Kudlow says subsidies for electric cars and other renewable energy programs might soon be eliminated.

That would be a major victory on the road to energy freedom.

National Economic Council chief Kudlow, a well-known free marketeer and supply-sider, said subsidies might disappear as soon as 2020 — interestingly, the next presidential election year.

The decision comes after General Motors — the beneficiary of $2,500-$7,000 tax credits for those who buy GM’s plug-in cars, not to mention two separate corporate tax cuts — decided to close five North American plants, leaving 14,700 workers without jobs. The move infuriated Trump.

“As a matter of our policy, we want to end all of those subsidies,” Kudlow said. “And by the way, other subsidies that were imposed during the Obama administration, we are ending, whether it’s for renewables and so forth.”

No doubt there will be much wailing and gnashing of teeth within the Green Movement. How will electric cars survive without government’s guiding hand?

The answer is, most won’t. Otherwise, the federal government wouldn’t need to subsidize them.

Democratic Opposition

As it is now, subsidies for each manufacturer are capped at 200,000 vehicles. Then the electric car credit starts to phase out.

Tesla is already in the phaseout; GM will get there soon.

No doubt, the new Democratic House will fight hard to keep the subsidies in place or even remove them entirely. And Kudlow admits that the White House can’t act unilaterally to end the program.

Meanwhile, as The Daily Signal observes: “Some members (of Congress) want to include a permanent extension of the $7,500 tax credit and to lift the 200,000 [vehicles] cap. An unlimited subsidy would be a massively expensive bill for taxpayers and a win for cronyism that awards money based on preferential treatment, rather than the competitive process.”

Subsidized Energy: Soft Socialism

In short, it’s the very opposite of a free-market economy, and the very essence of a soft-socialist economy. Haven’t we had enough of Washington bureaucrats telling us how to live our lives? Do inside-the-beltway types know more than millions of consumers? To ask the question is to answer it. No.

We wonder why these subsidies exist at all. Why should the government be urging consumers to buy one product rather than another, creating a major market distortion as they do so?

Moreover, the dirty little secret of the electric-car industry is that electric cars are dirty, too, and not necessarily cleaner than regular cars.

A recent Bloomberg piece highlighted a major study by Munich-based Berylls Strategy Advisors on the surprising truth about electric vehicles.

“The findings…show that while electric cars are emission-free on the road, they still discharge a lot of the carbon-dioxide that conventional cars do,” Bloomberg reported.

A big reason for this is the electric cars’ batteries, the heart of the industry. Many of the batteries are built in high-pollution countries like China, Thailand, Germany, and Poland, all of which depend heavily on coal for their energy.

So the CO2 produced just in making the electric cars is far greater than for a regular, gasoline-powered car.

In addition, when electric car charges, it’s really only as clean as the source of the electricity it uses.

In the U.S. in 2017, some 62.7% of all electricity was produced by coal, natural gas, oil, and other fossil fuels. Nearly a third — 30.1% — came from coal.

Coal-Fired Electric Cars

So every time someone charges an electric car, it creates CO2 emissions elsewhere. It’s not as clean as advertised. It’s like someone dumping their garbage on the lawn of a neighbor down the street while defending their own yard as pristine.

Don’t get us wrong: We’d love to see electric cars with long-lasting batteries fueled by ultra-clean energy sources.

But the technology doesn’t exist yet to let electric vehicles go the distances that people want their cars to go, or to recharge vehicles quickly enough. And electricity is still largely made by fossil fuels. Those are facts, not opinions.

Proponents say electric cars are an essential element in the war against global warming. This too is a joke. At enormous cost, electric cars would do little if anything even to slow predicted climate change.

No Help On Global Warming

In a study for the Manhattan Institute’s Economics 21 blog, economist Jonathan Lesser of Continental Resources, using government data on the expected number of new electric vehicles, found that “the net reduction in carbon dioxide emissions between 2018 and 2050 would be only about one-half of one percent of total forecast U.S. energy-related carbon emissions.”

“Such a small change,” Lesser concluded, “will have no impact whatsoever on climate.”

Moreover, the billions of dollars of subsidies and credits don’t go to all Americans, but mainly to high-income ones, since electric cars are still highly expensive on average.

As the Competitive Enterprise Institute explains, “79% of EV (electric vehicle) tax credits were claimed by households with an adjusted gross income of more than $100,000 a year.”

So Americans are subsidizing toys for the rich that aren’t necessarily either as economic or clean as advertised.

The same is true of other “alternative energy” subsidies, by the way. We should get rid of them all. They merely distort free energy markets, which will work just fine at delivering the best energy available at the lowest price.

Subsidies And Political Cronyism

Wind, solar and other “alternative” energies are near-perfect examples of political cronyism at its worst. They produce electricity at outrageously high cost.

They aren’t necessarily cleaner or better for the environment than fossil fuels. And they require subsidies to privileged, politically connected groups to exist.

The government shouldn’t be picking winners and losers in the marketplace. That’s especially true of energy, the lifeblood of the world economy. It’s almost always a costly error.

The Trump administration deserves kudos for recognizing these fundamental economic facts. We only wish the newly elected Democratic House–possibly the most left-wing group of elected officials in our nation’s history–also did.

Read more at Investor’s

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Bipolar

New Study: Ice Core Data Shows Modern Warming Is Statistically Unremarkable

Mar 05, 2026
Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024

Comments 3

  1. Asam says:
    7 years ago

    “Subsidized Energy: Soft Socialism” this resumes the problem. More and more subsides so, at the end, everything would depend on the state (government). That is, socialism (marxism).

  2. Graham McDonald says:
    7 years ago

    Looked at the Bloomberg article – Mike won’t be too happy – the writer and/or editor will probably be fired for it – too truthful. Then again, he might not be dealing ‘carbon credits’…..

  3. Sonnyhill says:
    7 years ago

    Ask the rich liberals to empty their pockets and buy electric scooters for the poor. After all, the rich liberals wouldn’t be rich if it wasn’t for fossil fuels. None of them lived off the grid. Maybe Harry Dean Stanton.
    Won’t happen.

Stay Connected!

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Get notified when new posts are published!

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Recent Posts

  • Hot sun hangs over city.Juicing The Numbers: How Temperature Data Got A Performance Boost
    Mar 16, 2026
    NASA's temperature baseline, data homogenization, and urban heat islands are juicing the numbers behind every "hottest year ever" claim. […]
  • mandami hochul congestion taxNYC Congestion Tax Has Race-Based Carveouts—And That May Be Illegal
    Mar 16, 2026
    NYC’s congestion pricing program includes special treatment for ethnic minorities, but not for non-minorities, which is likely illegal. […]
  • xi jinping conferenceChina Using Nonprofit Networks To Attack American Energy, Report Suggests
    Mar 16, 2026
    China-linked nonprofits funneled millions to Earthjustice as the group targeted Louisiana energy projects, a Pelican Institute report finds. […]
  • coffee bean plantation thrivingClimate Alarm Brews False Coffee Crisis As Global Production Sets Records
    Mar 13, 2026
    An activist group's study claims warming is devastating coffee crops, but real data shows output has more than doubled globally since 1995. […]
  • Trump EPA Moves To Reverse Biden’s Climate-Fueled Crackdown On Device Sterilization Gas
    Mar 13, 2026
    Trump’s EPA moves to scrap Biden’s strict ethylene oxide rule, warning it risked medical device shortages while keeping longstanding emissions limits. […]
  • wind turbine blades landfillBarclays Report Warns Renewable Energy Could Become Next ‘Stranded Asset’
    Mar 13, 2026
    Barclays report warns renewables face stranded-asset risk as grid bottlenecks, curtailment, and energy security challenge Net Zero viability. […]
  • movie floods sea levelNew Study Finds 90% Of Sea Level Research Relies On Models, Not Real Measurements
    Mar 13, 2026
    A review of 385 studies finds 90% relied on model assumptions rather than real coastal measurements. […]
  • hochul press eventNY Assembly Won’t Ease Climate Law, Floats $500 Energy Rebates For Soaring Bills
    Mar 12, 2026
    Hochul seeks to scale back the CLCPA as NY Assembly proposes $500 energy rebates to offset rising utility costs. […]
  • ursula von der leyenEU Chief Admits Europe’s Nuclear Phaseout Was A ‘Strategic Mistake’
    Mar 12, 2026
    EU chief Ursula von der Leyen admits Europe’s nuclear phaseout was a “strategic mistake” that contributed to high energy prices and reliance on imports. […]
  • time magTIME’s ‘Faster Than Ever’ Warming Claim Collides With Satellite Temperature Data
    Mar 12, 2026
    Satellite temperature data show steady global warming since 1979 with no post-2015 acceleration, contradicting TIME’s “faster than ever” claim. […]

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

Climate prn book

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky