Wind power is booming in the United States.
It’s expanded 35-fold since 2000 and now provides 8% of the nation’s electricity. The US Department of Energy expects wind turbine capacity to more than quadruple again by 2050.
But a new study by a pair of Harvard researchers finds that a high amount of wind power could mean more climate warming, at least regionally and in the immediate decades ahead.
The paper raises serious questions about just how much the United States or other nations should look to wind power to clean up electrical systems.
The study, published in the journal Joule, found that if wind power supplied all US electricity demands, it would warm the surface of the continental United States by 0.24˚C (0.5°F).
That could significantly exceed the reduction in US warming achieved by decarbonizing the nation’s electricity sector this century, which would be around 0.1 ˚C. (0.2°F)
“If your perspective is the next 10 years, wind power actually has—in some respects—more climate impact than coal or gas,” co-author David Keith, a professor of applied physics and public policy at Harvard, said in a statement. “If your perspective is the next thousand years, then wind power is enormously cleaner than coal or gas.”
Specifically, the “avoided warming” achieved by eliminating fossil-fuel sources could surpass any warming from wind in about a century in the studied scenario, as emissions reductions accumulate.
Keith and lead author Lee Miller, a postdoc at Harvard, stress that the conclusions mean scientists and policymakers should take this side effect of wind power seriously—and carefully consider what role the resource should play in the shift to clean energy.
“Our analysis suggests that—where feasible—it may make sense to push a bit harder on developing solar power and a bit less hard on wind,” Keith said in an e-mail.
Notably, the warming effect from wind in the studied scenario was 10 times greater than the climate effect from solar farms, which can also have a tiny warming effect.
The core problem is that wind turbines generate electricity by extracting energy out of the air, slowing down wind and otherwise altering “the exchange of heat, moisture, and momentum between the surface and the atmosphere,” the study explains. That can produce some level of warming.
Previous studies also pointed out the effect, but they generally looked at either small-scale or global impacts.
The new study sought to explore a “plausible scale” of wind power in a single large country. It compared model results against direct observations at wind farms, finding that they matched.
Read rest at MIT Technology Review
Time to get back to some common sense and dump the liberals Go Green poppycock
The best part of the study/article – the last sentence: the model matched real life.
Graham, something that the AGW models have failed to do, even once. And the only way they’ve been able to show significant warming is to keep erasing temperature records from the past that don’t help (e.g. the high temps of the ’30’s, the Medieval Warming, the Little Ice Age, …)
So wind energy only produces a tiny 8% of Americas energy needs and takes a toll on birds Its not worth it pouring millions of Dollats down the drain just to appease a bunch of Eco-Wackos
“The study, published in the journal Joule, found that if wind power supplied all US electricity demands”….. pigs will fly