• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Study: Burning Fossil Fuels Creates White Masculine Power, Violent Misogynists

by Toni Airaksinen
July 07, 2018, 7:04 PM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 2 mins read
A A
13

(h/t raining sky) A feminist professor at Virginia Tech University is warning that fossil fuels are contributing to a warped sense of “masculine identity” and “authoritarianism” among men.

Cara Daggett, who teaches classes on politics and global security at Virginia Tech, penned her criticism of petro-masculinity in an essay “Petro-masculinity: Fossil Fuels and Authoritarian Desire” for the most recent issue of Millennium: Journal of International Studies.

Writing in response to the 2016 election, Daggett coins the term “petro-masculinity” to describe what she sees as a convergence of “climate change, a threatened fossil fuel system, and an increasingly fragile Western hypermasculinity.”

“Petro-masculinity, like fossil fuel systems, arguably has global dimensions,” Daggett asserts. “However, like other masculinities, petro-masculinity should be understood as manifesting in multiple, and locally specific, ways.”

“Petro-masculinity approaches masculinity as a socially constructed identity that emerges ‘within a gender order that defines masculinity in opposition to femininity, and in so doing, sustains a power relation between men and women as groups,’” she adds, quoting other academic literature on the topic.

Unlike the “hegemonic masculinity” of the past—which is a general term to describe masculinity under patriarchy—Daggett claims that petro-masculinity is a recent phenomenon, specifically triggered by global warming.

Petro-masculinity, she claims, ultimately aims “to defend the endangered status quo, entrenching the petrocultures that have historically propped up Anglo-European fossil-burning men.”

“In this context, burning fossil fuels can come to function as a knowingly violent experience, a reassertion of white masculine power on an unruly planet that is perceived to be increasingly in need of violent, authoritarian order,” Daggett argues.

According to the professor, men’s desire to burn fossil fuels can also explain the concept of misogyny.

“Fossil-fuelled life has always been violent,” she says, later adding that “fossil violence” should “also be appreciated as a misogynist tactic, if we follow Kate Manne to think of misogyny not as an individual belief—the hatred of women—but instead as a set of practices.”

Prior to her essay on petro-masculinity, Daggett’s most notable publication was a 2015 article titled, “Drone Disorientations: How ‘Unmanned’ Weapons Queer the Experience of Killing in War.”

Read more at Campus Reform

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024
Energy

30-Plus Signs That The Climate Scam Is Collapsing

Apr 09, 2025

Comments 13

  1. David Lewis says:
    7 years ago

    It is amazing how liberals recycle their cheap tactics. Cara Daggett is basically saying that use of fossil fuels is for cheap masculinity and therefore can be dispensed with. A few decades ago the liberals seriously made the same claim about guns.

    Perhaps these people make such claims not only to further their political cause, but because they have no idea what real masculinity is.

    Reply
  2. BringBackLogic says:
    7 years ago

    Fossil fuels = cheap energy. If we had never had cheap energy we would never have been able to develop society to a point where we could fund post-secondary education for so many people. Nor developed the enormous variety of modern conveniences, medical breakthroughs and poverty reduction measures provided to society. Only a few elite would have such luxury as time for studying areas of higher learning.

    Imagine a world without fossil fuels. In that world the focus would be on hunting, gathering and subsistence farming. It would be a world of tribalism, where you protect your community’s assets from those who would take it from you and so strength in numbers would determine who would survive. Humans’ sole focus, in fact, would be on survival and that survival would require brute strength. In that society, all the currently demeaned measures of masculinity would be the ONLY thing standing between humans and certain extinction.

    If post-secondary areas of study are not going to teach people how to think logically anymore, we should defund them. They are useless and there are far more important things to spend (or save) our tax dollars on.

    Reply
  3. Spurwing Plover says:
    7 years ago

    Modern enviromentalists are a sign of the stupidity of liberal ecology idiots that started back in the 1970’s with the first Earth Day and groups like Friends of the Earth and the Zero Population wackos and Paul Ehrlich

    Reply
  4. Mjw says:
    7 years ago

    And there was me thinking it caused rampant stupidity in feminists.

    Reply
  5. john from michigan says:
    7 years ago

    We certainly don’t want men to be masculine. (She’s kidding, right? Her problem is probably that she’s not a man and is bitter about it. We used to call it p***s envy. Actually, masculine men don’t have that problem. We’re happy that women are feminine, (and unlike Ms. Daggett). Like most of the nation’s largest hate group, the Democratic Party, You have to have someone to hate to be a good liberal. I feel sorry for them.

    Reply
    • David Lewis says:
      7 years ago

      A conservative black commentator made an excellent observation about the Democratic Party. They deliberately fractionalize our society. It is unions vs industry, at one time Jews vs everyone else, women vs men, and each ethic minority vs the entire society. The Democrats then put themselves forward as the best representative of the groups that they have created and get their votes.

      Reply
  6. Amber says:
    7 years ago

    Can a run for the Democrats Socialist Party be far off ? Men also buy hot cars to oick up women which contributes to population growth . Not a very happy thought to eco anarchists and their population extermination agenda masked as saving the planet .
    Can’t wait for her breath taking analysis of why women are attracted to fossil fuel piggy’s. Maybe they instinctively go for mates that source and use energy so they don’t freeze .
    She is right about one thing fighting over the last lump of coal is going to get violent .

    Reply
  7. Spurwing Plover says:
    7 years ago

    Cara Daggett another nut that has fallen from the Nut Tree just as rediculous as Bill Nye and his idiotic rant a gaainst Livestock

    Reply
  8. Gerry says:
    7 years ago

    “According to the professor, men’s desire to burn fossil fuels can also explain the concept of misogyny.”

    Is she talkin bout premium grades or everthin including the weasel piss blends??? ;o)

    So men’s desire to burn fossil fuels explains men’s dislike of, contempt for and our outright ingrained prejudice against women.

    That does seem likely since other academaniacal’s have concluded that burning fossil fuels also explains jingoism, excessive patriotism, blind patriotism, excessive nationalism, sectarianism, isolationism, excessive loyalty, flag-waving, xenophobia, racism, racial prejudice, ethnocentrism, ethnocentricity, partisanship, partiality, prejudice, bias, discrimination, intolerance, bigotry queer fear and an excessive reverence for God, the Constitution, the rule of law and gun ownership.

    Reply
  9. Steve Bunten says:
    7 years ago

    This is not a one-off from this twit. Can’t imagine sending any kids to such a school. Here’s another great one written by her.

    https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14616742.2015.1075317

    Reply
  10. ralph says:
    7 years ago

    The lady professor would have an instant heart attack due to the level of testosterone if she ever stepped inside a bodybuilding gym.

    Reply
  11. Sonnyhill says:
    7 years ago

    Cara Daggett is a kill joy.
    Rednecks do burn outs with their half-tons as part of a mating ritual, and she don’t wanna play.

    Reply
  12. ClimateP says:
    7 years ago

    Goes to show how batshit insane the leftwing is.

    Reply

Comments are welcome! Those that add no discussion value may be removed.Cancel reply

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • pope leo vaticanPope’s Ice Blessing Stirs Debate Over Church Doctrine And Climate Activism
    Oct 13, 2025
    A pope’s ice blessing melts into controversy as faith, politics, and climate activism collide. […]
  • Earth orbit satelliteMeteorologist Calls Out ‘Settled’ Climate Claims, Reveals Overlooked Atmospheric Dynamics
    Oct 13, 2025
    A meteorologist disputes the oversimplified 'settled science' narrative, highlighting a 3D view of the atmosphere and the water cycle’s role in warming. […]
  • Protest you decideCOP30 Climate Summit Sparks Backlash Over Net Zero Edicts, Soaring Energy Costs
    Oct 13, 2025
    COP30 exposes the flaws of Net Zero policies, rising energy costs, and global climate claims as experts and voters push back worldwide. […]
  • Media fear complexThe Climate Creed: How Fear Replaced Science
    Oct 13, 2025
    When fear replaced science, climate bureaucrats and media narratives turned inquiry into obedience—and faith over facts. […]
  • 1930S Dust BowlBloomberg’s Climate Alarm Misfires: U.S. Heat Records Show 1930s Still Hottest
    Oct 10, 2025
    New data challenges Bloomberg’s heat claims, showing U.S. temp records peaked in the 1930s, not the modern era, despite climate alarmist narratives. […]
  • Rinderknecht facebook postSuspected Pacific Palisades Firebug Ranted Online About Trump, Climate Change
    Oct 10, 2025
    The alleged firebug behind the Pacific Palisades fire ranted online about climate change, Trump, Antarctic ice, and plant-based diets. […]
  • Solar panel farmBLM Cancels Mammoth Nevada Solar Project Under Trump’s Energy Agenda
    Oct 10, 2025
    BLM pulled the plug on a massive Nevada solar power project amid the Trump administration’s crackdown on renewable energy projects. […]
  • North Sea Wind FarmScientists Warn EU’s Net Zero Push Fueling Green Colonialism In Poor Countries
    Oct 10, 2025
    Scientists warn the green energy push risks exploiting developing nations, draining resources, and worsening global inequality under climate action. […]
  • Leonardo DiCaprio and his megayacht‘Green Antoinettes’ Preach Sacrifice While Jetting Off In Luxury
    Oct 10, 2025
    From Leo DiCaprio to AOC, celebs and politicians moralize about climate austerity while jetting off in luxury, fueling public backlash. […]
  • city underwaterYahoo News Pushes False Claim Cape Coral Will Vanish Under Rising Seas
    Oct 9, 2025
    Yahoo News amplified a false claim that Cape Coral will vanish under rising seas, ignoring NOAA tide data showing only a modest, steady sea level trend. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Climate Change Dispatch

Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky