• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Exclusive: Leaked Memo Reveals Extent Of Steyer’s Involvement In The Anti-Exxon Campaign

by Chris White
June 20, 2018, 9:29 AM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
3

Billionaire activist Tom Steyer and his multiple environmental groups might have been more involved in the campaign to take down ExxonMobil than previously thought, according to a leaked memo The Daily Caller News Foundation obtained.

Fahr LLC, NextGen America, and TomKat Foundation hashed out ways to “weaken the political influence of the oil industry by leveraging the ExxonMobil investigation” during a strategy meeting in November 2015, the memo notes. They also sought to “target Exxon management” and “engage with city attorneys” in California on future campaigns against the Texas-based company.

All three groups were founded by Steyer, who has positioned himself as a stringent opponent of the oil industry.

The memo references a probe former New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman kickstarted on Nov. 5, 2015, to determine if Exxon lied to the public about the risks climate change pose to investors.

Schneiderman, a Democrat, tried to arrange a phone meeting with Steyer four months after the AG announced the climate investigation.

Ted White, a lawyer for Fahr LLC who attended the November 2015 meeting, sent an email to Erin Suhr, director of strategic planning at Fahr LLC, noting “Eric Schneiderman would like to have a call with Tom regarding support for his race for governor . . . regarding Exxon case.”

Steyer, a Democratic financier who is also waging a crusade to get President Donald Trump impeached, has waged his own private crusade in the past against Exxon.

NextGen held a rally in April 2016 to push former New Hampshire AG Joseph Foster to take up the anti-Exxon message. The group continued to push and prod the Democrat to pursue Exxon.

NextGen called on Foster “to find the truth about whether Exxon Mobil intentionally misled the public about the risk climate change and fossil fuels pose to our communities,” according to a press statement the group published at the time. Steyer eventually backed away from the probe as the 2016 election neared.

“We’re definitely not pushing this thing,” Steyer told Politico on Sept.21 2016 when asked about his communications with Schneiderman, who obtained hundreds of thousands of dollars from billionaire liberals as the Exxon investigations took hold. “We are not part of this effort,” Steyer added.

An official with NextGen clarified Steyer’s comments, telling Politico a day later that the probe is “not something that Tom personally is pushing, though some of our teams on the ground have participated in rallies or events to support our coalition partners.”

But the November 2015 memo TheDCNF obtained appears to show NextGen, among other groups associated with Steyer, played an important role in brainstorming ways to target Exxon. Their actions went above and beyond organizing rallies with coalition parties.

Two of the people present at the meeting were briefed in November 2015 about aspects of the legal campaign against the oil industry.

NextGen Chief Operating Officer Dan Lashof and the group’s attorney, David Weiskopf, received a confidential March 9, 2015, memo outlining the legal strategy, according to media reports.

Cities across the country slowly but surely began pursuing oil companies for their alleged crimes against the environment.

Oakland, San Francisco, and New York, for instance, have all pursued lawsuits against Exxon, Chevron, and others for their contributions to climate change.

San Francisco, for one, announced it would sue oil giants BP, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, Exxon, and Shell.

The city wants oil companies to pay for infrastructure projects that San Francisco claims it needs to ease the impacts of climate change.

City officials announced the lawsuit shortly after Steyer provided a $30,000 donation to a ballot initiative headed by the mayor.

NextGen has not responded to the TheDCNF’s request for comment about the memo or the nature of the meeting.

Steyer has amassed a reputation as a kingmaker in Democratic politics and a bitter enemy of fossil fuels.

He spent about $86 million in the 2016 election cycle in a losing bid to get Democrats elected, while NextGen plowed another $56 million into that year’s election, according to campaign finance data.

NextGen also spent nearly $21 million in the 2014 election cycle, but only had a 38 percent rate of supporting winning candidates, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

Steyer spent more than $73 million of his personal fortune that election cycle, only to see Republicans take control of the Senate.

His overall contributions dwarfed those of fellow billionaire Sheldon Adelson, a conservative who pledged $47 million in donations to Republican candidates in 2016.

Read more at Daily Caller

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024
Energy

30-Plus Signs That The Climate Scam Is Collapsing

Apr 09, 2025

Comments 3

  1. David Lewis says:
    8 years ago

    Considering his activities, Steyer could be and should be sued for his part in the conspiracy.

  2. Alan Stewart says:
    8 years ago

    Fascinating legal concept in context. Being sued for a crime that has not yet occured.
    The solution is actually simple. Turn the oil off for only a couple of days. The ensuing chaos and economic destruction will result in an immediate presidential and congressional law deeming oil an essential industry to the security of the U.S.A.

  3. Spurwing Plover says:
    8 years ago

    Tom Steyer just like Michael Bloomberg,George Soros and comnany want to have Trump removed from office and replaced with a Obama Clone who is loyal to the Useless Nations and his corupt Democrat Party

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • winter wind farmPoll: New England Women Frustrated By Surging Energy Costs, Unsure Who To Blame
    Jan 28, 2026
    A new poll finds most New England women are concerned by rising energy costs, unaware that blue state climate policies are driving higher electric bills. […]
  • trump speechTIME Rages At Trump Mocking Climate Change Before ‘Historic’ Snowstorm
    Jan 28, 2026
    Before the recent record winter storm, Trump mocked global warming; TIME and the media mavens had a freak-out. […]
  • wood stoveUK Orders Cigarette-Style Health Warnings For Wood-Burning Stoves
    Jan 28, 2026
    UK will require cigarette-style health warnings on wood-burning stoves, firewood, and smokeless fuel as part of a sweeping crackdown on home heating. […]
  • Earth and SunWhy Carbon Dioxide Does Not Cause Warming
    Jan 27, 2026
    New laboratory tests show carbon dioxide cools rapidly after heating, raising questions about claims that CO2 traps heat in the atmosphere. […]
  • calif family bills legalCalifornia’s Climate Lawsuit Hits Energy Consumers, Not Emissions
    Jan 27, 2026
    California sues energy producers over climate, but families still face soaring bills while officials dodge real solutions. […]
  • animal speciesStudy Challenges Sixth Mass Extinction Claims As Species Losses Fall
    Jan 27, 2026
    New research finds species loss is declining, challenging claims of a sixth mass extinction and debunking alarmist narratives. […]
  • natural gas germanyGermany Teeters On Energy Disaster As Natural Gas Storage Hits Critical Lows
    Jan 26, 2026
    Bavarian gas storage drops to critical lows at only 6% full, threatening industrial shutdowns and Germany’s energy security. […]
  • solar farm sunChinese Solar Companies Scramble To Hide China Ties To Keep U.S. Green Tax Credits Flowing
    Jan 26, 2026
    Solar firms are restructuring to hide China ties as Trump’s new law blocks green tax credits for companies with more than 25% Chinese ownership. […]
  • flooding india monsoonClimate Expert: 2025 Weather Catastrophe Losses Continue Downward Trend Since 1990
    Jan 26, 2026
    2025 weather-related catastrophe losses remained below historical averages as a share of global GDP, continuing a downward trend since 1990. […]
  • green energy gambitSpanberger’s Green Energy Plans For Virginia Spark Major Concerns Over Costs, Reliability
    Jan 26, 2026
    Virginia ratepayers face rising energy costs and reliability risks as Spanberger pushes wind, solar, and costly battery mandates. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky