A Sept. 9 story published by National Public Radio (NPR) asked: Can the most popular red wine in the U.S. endure climate change? The answer is yes, despite the story falsely suggesting the opposite. [emphasis, links added]
Data suggests that Napa Valley grapes have survived hotter temperatures in the past, and despite over 30 years of modest global warming, grape production has increased in the area.
Here are some excerpts from the article:
But increasingly severe heat waves are taking a toll on the grape variety, especially in late summer during ripening. As temperatures keep rising, the wine industry is slowly confronting a future where Napa may not be the prime cabernet region it once was.
…
The vineyard is already at the hotter northern end of Napa Valley, but the extreme heat in recent years has been a wake-up call. A late-summer heat wave in 2022 hit temperatures just under 120 degrees at the vineyard, she says.
“When it gets that hot, the vines, they’re done,” she says. “They’re going to go dormant, and when that happens, they’re not ripening anymore.”
First, the author Lauren Sommer conflates a short-term heat wave with long-term climate change.
Secondly, according to temperature records, while Napa Valley set a new high-temperature record of 114°F on September 6, 2022, it was only a degree hotter than the previous high-temperature record of 113°F, set 61 years of global warming ago in 1961.
A one-degree difference for one day spanning 61 years is not indicative of climate change, but simply natural weather variation. Weather does not operate in the same time frames as climate.
Figure 1 below, plotted by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), displays monthly average high temperatures for September.
NAPA county has experienced many hot Septembers throughout its history. Some were even higher than September 2022 when the entire month is averaged:
Note that many past Septembers had monthly average temperatures greater than or equal to September 2022.
In the table that NOAA provides with the graph plot, they indicate that September 2022 was not unusual at all, ranking 121 out of 129 years for maximum temperature, indicating that eight previous Septembers were hotter:
Also, production numbers for red grapes indicate that their output has not been harmed by recent temperatures.
Figure 3 tracks grape production in California, with Napa in green, and shows a steady increase in tonnage harvested, not just in the Napa region, but for all regions:
If long-term climate change was detrimental to wine grape production, surely it would show up in data informing Figure 3, but it doesn’t.
Climate change doesn’t come in the form of a single day’s hot temperatures, such as what NPR is conflating; it comes in the form of sustained increases over time.
The data suggests NPR’s Lauren Sommer may have been drinking too much wine when she wrote that story or, more likely, she failed to look into the actual temperature and grape production data before commencing to write a story in the “climate change causes everything bad” narrative; choosing her anecdotes to fit the narrative.
We can add this poorly researched story to the dozens of similar stories that Climate Realism has taken the media to task over faulty or selective reporting.
Wine grapes can and have endured climate change, and the media are just dealing out scary stories without merit.
NPR’s reporting on grapes seems more an expression of “sour grapes” at so many alarming climate scare stories having been debunked, rather than factual reporting on any dangers facing grape and wine production.
Top photo by David Köhler on Unsplash
Read more at Climate Realism
Pity the Goldilocks grape. I’ll bet that Ontario (Canada) growers will moan about low sugar yield because of too much rain.
Grape production have increased in spite of a slight warming or perhaps because of the warming with higher CO2 levels allowing faster growth? One wonders…
Yes, we should wonder. And why do so many call a subtle warming trend climate change? Oh right, its frequent and inappropriate use by the media, and alarmists in general, is just code for “bad stuff blamed on human development”, not a reference to change in real world climate.