• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Solar Activity Has A Direct Impact On Earth’s Cloud Cover

by Morten Garly Andersen
December 08, 2017, 10:27 AM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
7

A team of scientists from the National Space Institute at the Technical University of Denmark (DTU Space) and the Racah Institute of Physics at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem has linked large solar eruptions to changes in Earth’s cloud cover in a study based on over 25 years of satellite observations.

The solar eruptions are known to shield Earth’s atmosphere from cosmic rays. However, the new study, published in Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, shows that the global cloud cover is simultaneously reduced, supporting the idea that cosmic rays are important for cloud formation.

The eruptions cause a reduction in cloud fraction of about 2 percent corresponding to roughly a billion tonnes of liquid water disappearing from the atmosphere.

Since clouds are known to affect global temperatures on longer timescales, the present investigation represents an important step in the understanding of clouds and climate variability.

“Earth is under constant bombardment by particles from space called galactic cosmic rays. Violent eruptions at the Sun’s surface can blow these cosmic rays away from Earth for about a week. Our study has shown that when the cosmic rays are reduced in this way there is a corresponding reduction in Earth’s cloud cover. Since clouds are an important factor in controlling the temperature on Earth our results may have implications for climate change,” explains lead author on the study Jacob Svensmark of DTU.

Very energetic particles

These particles generate electrically charged molecules — ions — in Earth’s atmosphere. Ions have been shown in the laboratory to enhance the formation of aerosols, which can serve as seeds for the formation of the cloud drops that make up a cloud.

Whether this actually happens in the atmosphere, or only in the laboratory is a topic that has been investigated and debated for years.

When the large solar eruptions blow away the galactic cosmic rays before they reach Earth they cause a reduction in atmospheric ions of up to about 20 to 30 percent over the course of a week.

So if ions affect cloud formation it should be possible to observe a decrease in cloud cover during events when the Sun blows away cosmic rays, and this is precisely what is done in this study.

The so-called ‘Forbush decreases’ of the cosmic rays have previously been linked to week-long changes in Earth’s cloud cover but the effect has been debated at length in the scientific literature.

The new study concludes that “there is a real impact of Forbush decreases on cloud microphysics” and that the results support the suggestion that “ions play a significant role in the life-cycle of clouds.”

Arriving at that conclusion was, however, a hard endeavor; Very few strong Forbush decreases occur and their effect on cloud formation is expected to be close to the limit of detection using global atmospheric observations measured by satellites and land-based stations.

Therefore, it was of the greatest importance to select the strongest events for study since they had to have the most easily detected effect. Determining this strength required combining data from about 130 stations in combination with atmospheric modeling.

This new method resulted in a list of 26 events in the period of 1987-2007 ranked according to ionization. This ranked list was important for the detection of a signal, and may also shed some light on why previous studies have arrived at varied conclusions since they have relied on events that were not necessarily ranked high on the list.

Possible long-term effect

The effect of Forbush decreases on clouds is too brief to have any impact on long-term temperature changes.

However since clouds are affected by short-term changes in galactic cosmic radiation, they may well also be affected by the slower change in Solar activity that happens on scales from tens to hundreds of years, and thus play a role in the radiation budget that determines the global temperature.

The Sun’s contribution to past and future climate change may thus be larger than merely the direct changes in radiation, concludes the scientists behind the new study.

Read more at DTU Space

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024
Energy

30-Plus Signs That The Climate Scam Is Collapsing

Apr 09, 2025

Comments 7

  1. Sonnyhill says:
    8 years ago

    The contest between solar flares and cosmic rays has been replicated in a very expensive cloud chamber in France. Why we don’t hear more about that demonstration and the implications for global warming hypothesis is a mystery to me. Maybe serious science takes time and debate? Answers lead to more questions?

  2. Amber says:
    8 years ago

    Gee I guess I missed the chapter on Solar Flares in the IPCC
    propaganda papers . Maybe next time …. if there is one or is the “science settled ” when the facts don’t support the propaganda ? Me thinks so.

  3. Spurwing Plover says:
    8 years ago

    It seems that Solar Flares and sun spots do more then disrupt radio and phone communications they also influance our weather even though were 93 million miles away from the sun

  4. G says:
    8 years ago

    Solar activity would seem to be such an obvious contributor to the earth’s climate. After all, the earth is repeatedly hit by these tidal waves of energy. Yet we are told to ignore the sun and believe that CO2, check that, man-made CO2, must be the driving force of change, when the climate has been demonstrably and profoundly changing for billions of years. Climate hubris.

    • rakooi says:
      8 years ago

      Solar output is CONSTANTLY studied.
      It cannot explain the RISE IN WORLD Temperatures.
      Every Few Years we have a cyclical solar minimum…and temps continue to rise.
      For decades, overall solar output has been static to a tiny decrease in output.
      Why don’t you try to explain why EARTH’S most Powerful natural cycle was terminated….after 8000 years of slowly falling temps….around 1750 the fall in temps ended abruptly.
      Even though all of the natural causes of our ICE AGES continue….
      Google the Milankovitch cycles.
      Here Look:
      http://www.realclimate.org/images//Marcott.png

  5. Sonnyhill says:
    8 years ago

    It’s reassuring that real scientists are looking past carbon dioxide in order to understand Earth’s climate.

    • rakooi says:
      8 years ago

      Google AIP history of Global Warming
      you will see over 100 different alternative Theories that were presented to explain the END of Earth’s most powerful natural cycle, the ICE AGE….
      ALL fell woefully short of the science thresh hold of acceptance.
      On the other hand, in their attempts to substantiate any one of the theories improved and supported the standing of Global Warming Science.
      and still,
      one is dumbfounded that denial still resonates in ignorant minds….like an echo in an empty building.
      SKEPTICS / DENIERS Predictions
      are REMARKABLY WRONG, again!

      “….Jon Austin October 9, 2015
      …One of the world’s leading climate change experts claims to have
      discovered mathematical anomalies
      which effectively ‘ DISPROVE ’ global warming.
      .
      Dr David Evans, a former climate modeller for the Government’s Australian Greenhouse Office,
      says global warming predictions have been vastly exaggerated in error.
      The academic,
      from Perth, Australia, who has passed six degrees in applied mathematics,
      has analysed complex mathematical assumptions widely used to predict climate change
      and
      HE is predicting world temperature will stagnate until 2017 before cooling,
      with a ‘mini ice age’ by 2030.

      Dr. Evans is not a climatologist but rather a PHD in Electrical Engineering,
      with a Math undergraduate degree.
      He has no training in climatology.
      He has DONE no research in climatology.

      ((THIS PRECISE Prediction was made in the 70’s by SKEPTICS Scientist & DENIERS,
      THIS PRECISE Prediction was made in the 90’s by
      SKEPTIC / DENIERS CHRISTY & SPENCER ))

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • byd dealershipChina’s BYD Overtakes Tesla As Global EV Sales Continue To Plummet
    Jan 2, 2026
    BYD surpasses Tesla as EV sales tumble, marking the biggest annual slump in Tesla’s history. […]
  • earthStudy Finds CO2 Plays Minor Role In Contemporary Global Warming
    Jan 2, 2026
    Human CO2 emissions have contributed just 1.57% to global temperature rise since 1750, showing CO2’s minimal climate impact. […]
  • power lines solar meterDem-Run States Are Gouging Their Residents With Sky-High Electricity Rates
    Jan 2, 2026
    Dem-run blue states are driving up electricity rates by mandating costly wind and solar, then blaming everyone else as residents pay the price. […]
  • newsom high pricesClimate Policy, Not Climate Change, Is Pricing Californians Out
    Dec 31, 2025
    California’s soaring housing and energy costs are being driven by climate and energy policies, not by modest changes in temperature. […]
  • World in EU chainsTo Kick Off 2026, Europe Moves To Silence Climate Dissent
    Dec 31, 2025
    As the EU's climate narrative collapses, desperate leaders are planning more tyrannical measures to keep it all from sinking. […]
  • protest climate system change17 Attorneys General Take On Climate Cartel, Warn of Radical ESG Tactics
    Dec 31, 2025
    17 AGs warn the activist group "As You Sow" to stop pushing net-zero policies that violate antitrust laws and drain Americans’ wallets. […]
  • gavel earth lawsuits2025 Year In Review: Courtroom Losses Mount For Climate Lawfare
    Dec 31, 2025
    In 2025, climate lawfare faced repeated courtroom defeats, leaving litigants and industry alike awaiting a pivotal SCOTUS decision in 2026. […]
  • Offshore wind farmOffshore Wind Produces Far Less Energy Than Governments Projected, Study Finds
    Dec 30, 2025
    Study finds offshore wind farms could produce far less energy than projected, risking gaps in carbon-free electricity targets. […]
  • YCC photo essay nopeMeteorologist: Dramatic Disaster Photos Don’t Prove Climate Change
    Dec 30, 2025
    A meteorologist explains why dramatic disaster photos — not long-term data — are being used to sell climate claims. […]
  • power plant nat gasEx-FERC Official Warns DOE’s Data Center Plan Threatens Grid Reliability
    Dec 30, 2025
    Ex-FERC official warns DOE’s data center plan could threaten grid reliability and strip states of control over power and costs. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky