Senator John Kennedy (R) fired a round of questions on climate change reduction policies and goals that turned out to be devastating for Democrat Jamie Raskin.
h/t Townhall
Sen. John Kennedy Makes Climate Alarmist Democrat Look Like A Fool At Hearing
Comments 5
Recent Posts
Shocker: 2025 Hurricane Predictions Flop; No U.S. Landfalls For First Time in 10 YearsNov 25, 2025Media-predicted 2025 hurricane disaster never hit the U.S., marking the first landfall-free season in a decade. […]
COP30 Descends Into Chaos Amid Deforestation And China’s Climate Power PlayNov 25, 2025COP30 spiraled into chaos as Amazon clearing, venue failures, and China’s big climate push overshadowed the UN’s so-called summit. […]
Supreme Court To Weigh In On ‘Climate Lawfare’ Jurisdiction FightNov 24, 2025Supreme Court steps into a growing clash as activists push state courts and energy companies fight for federal review in sweeping climate lawsuits. […]
Fossil Fuel Demand Climbs As Green Transition StallsNov 24, 2025Fossil fuel demand keeps climbing as climate targets and green energy promises clash with global power needs. […]
NPR’s Climate Alarmism Gets A Reality Check: Three ‘Massive’ Claims, Zero EvidenceNov 24, 2025NPR falsely warns that Greenland ice, coral reefs, and permafrost face climate 'tipping points'; these claims are activism disguised as reporting. […]
COP30 Summit Ends in Widespread Disappointment Over Lukewarm Climate RoadmapNov 24, 2025COP30 ends with widespread disappointment as the U.N. pushes trillions in climate spending and a faster fossil fuel phase-out. […]
The Paris Agreement Delusion: What Emissions Data Actually RevealNov 24, 2025The Paris Agreement is hailed as a climate success, but real emissions data show it's a decarbonization delusion, busting the hype. […]
How Trump’s DOE Just Nuked Biden’s Climate Bureaucracy Into OblivionNov 21, 2025Secretary Wright slashes Biden’s climate bureaucracy, restores oil reserves, and pushes affordable, reliable energy for America. […]
COP30 Doomsayers Warn: World May Now Get Colder, Not HotterNov 21, 2025Nordic delegates at COP30 claim the Atlantic conveyor belt could collapse, threatening a mini ice age—even as real data shows the hype may be overblown. […]
After Decades of Failed Predictions, ABC News Pushes Latest Climate PanicNov 21, 2025ABC News warns of flooding toxic sites, but Americans remain skeptical after decades of failed climate predictions. […]
Books You May Like
Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.
Making Gore and DiCaprio squirm around a while
I’m also bothered by the careless use of carbon and carbon dioxide interchangeably, but we need to focus on what matters.
At the time of the Kyoto Treaty the US was admitting more than half the carbon dioxide of world’s nations. Therefore it appeared that a drastic reduction by the US would be significant on the world wide scale. Those who are ignorant or support agendas hitchhiking on climate change movement have refused to let go of what appeared to be the case. China has significant emissions and they are growing fast. India will continue increase it emissions. Forest fires in the Boreal Forests may not emit as much carbon dioxide as Senator Kennedy says but they amount is obviously huge. We don’t know how much carbon dioxide is emitted geologic action but it is obvious immense. Our emissions are obviously small in the context world emissions and there certainly is no justification for spending a trillion dollars a year to reduce our emissions.
“Geologic action”. Add to that the carbon dioxide released from ocean/seawater as it warms.
I don’t have the figures in front of me, but I believe the quantity released for degree C. rise is not inconsiderable.
A doubling of CO2 will result in a 1 to 1.2 degree Celsius temp rise. The effect is logarithmic, it diminishes with increasing volume. That kind of warming is no crisis, is mainly beneficial, plants, crops, trees grow much better with higher levels of CO2, make them more efficient with water use.
As usual the entire discussion is nonsensical since nobody there realizes that carbon and carbon dioxide are completely different substances. Even where the focus is on scientific matters, there is not excuse for not having good command of the language