Senator John Kennedy (R) fired a round of questions on climate change reduction policies and goals that turned out to be devastating for Democrat Jamie Raskin.
h/t Townhall
Sen. John Kennedy Makes Climate Alarmist Democrat Look Like A Fool At Hearing
Comments 5
Recent Posts
The Climate Scaremongers: BBC Admits It Lied About Vanishing Polar BearsNov 22, 2024Far from declining, the world’s population of polar bears has tripled since the 1960s, thanks to the ban on hunting in 1973. […]
Labour Slaps New Tax On UK Farms While Sending £500M In Net Zero Aid To Foreign FarmersNov 22, 2024The UK Labour party is sending millions to farmers abroad for net zero agriculture, sparking backlash as British farms face massive tax hikes. […]
Media Alarmism Falls Flat: Climate Change Isn’t Threatening Georgia FarmersNov 22, 2024No evidence supports the media claim that climate change has worsened Georgia's weather or harmed its agriculture sector. […]
‘Put Us To Work Right Now’: Trump Plans To Resurrect Keystone XL Pipeline On Day OneNov 22, 2024Trump plans to revive Keystone XL, reversing Biden's cancellation that critics say hurt energy security, jobs, and lowered U.S. energy supply. […]
California’s Gas Warfare Heats Up Over Exodus Of Oil CompaniesNov 22, 2024Despite California's sunny rhetoric about delivering lower prices, the state’s oil industry is undergoing slow-motion deconstruction. […]
The EU And UN’s Climate Finance Showdown: While The West Remits, China EmitsNov 22, 2024While Western nations are being told to fund the global climate transition, China and other nations are only asked to contribute ‘voluntarily.’ […]
HHS ‘Climate Change’ Chief Vows to Block Trump ReformsNov 21, 2024The top HHS climate officer plans to 'resist' Trump by safeguarding climate programs and funding despite risks of his office closing. […]
At COP29, Officials Want To ‘Trump-Proof’ Their Green Funding With Global Climate TaxNov 21, 2024Foreign officials at U.N. COP29 want global climate taxes on numerous industries to give climate cash to poor countries. […]
False Alarm: PBS Blames Wildfires On Climate Change, Ignores Historical DataNov 21, 2024PBS is blaming Northeast wildfires on climate change and ignoring real-world data showing wildfires and droughts aren't unusual in the region. […]
Green Groups Block US Mines While Aggressively Pushing ‘Clean’ EnergyNov 21, 2024Green groups block U.S. mining projects essential for clean energy, citing environmental risks. But safe, local mining is essential to America's future. […]
Books We Like
Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.
Making Gore and DiCaprio squirm around a while
I’m also bothered by the careless use of carbon and carbon dioxide interchangeably, but we need to focus on what matters.
At the time of the Kyoto Treaty the US was admitting more than half the carbon dioxide of world’s nations. Therefore it appeared that a drastic reduction by the US would be significant on the world wide scale. Those who are ignorant or support agendas hitchhiking on climate change movement have refused to let go of what appeared to be the case. China has significant emissions and they are growing fast. India will continue increase it emissions. Forest fires in the Boreal Forests may not emit as much carbon dioxide as Senator Kennedy says but they amount is obviously huge. We don’t know how much carbon dioxide is emitted geologic action but it is obvious immense. Our emissions are obviously small in the context world emissions and there certainly is no justification for spending a trillion dollars a year to reduce our emissions.
“Geologic action”. Add to that the carbon dioxide released from ocean/seawater as it warms.
I don’t have the figures in front of me, but I believe the quantity released for degree C. rise is not inconsiderable.
A doubling of CO2 will result in a 1 to 1.2 degree Celsius temp rise. The effect is logarithmic, it diminishes with increasing volume. That kind of warming is no crisis, is mainly beneficial, plants, crops, trees grow much better with higher levels of CO2, make them more efficient with water use.
As usual the entire discussion is nonsensical since nobody there realizes that carbon and carbon dioxide are completely different substances. Even where the focus is on scientific matters, there is not excuse for not having good command of the language