“We are Borg. You will be assimilated. Resistance is futile.”
The fake news Washington Post reports that “scientists” did an “entire study” proving that satellites show no leveling off of warming. The implication being that all scientists speak in one voice and share the same opinion.
Instead of doing “an entire study” how about we just look at the data? Over the last 20 years, satellites show no warming.
Wood for Trees: Interactive Graphs
Science is not a Borg of idiots who can’t understand simple data, as the Washington Post imagines. Science is a process. The stupidity and dishonesty level of the Washington Post is off the scale. They don’t understand the first thing about science. Not all scientists are criminals, like the ones which the Washington post likes to quote.
Source
Keep in mind that the surface data is another one of NOAA’s frauds. Past articles in the Climate Change Dispatch have shown how NOAA has eliminated 70% of the ground sensors. They removed the ones at higher altitudes and in rural areas. The result is the sensors left show an average of higher temperatures.
Liberals and eco-wacoks dont like the facts getting in the way of why they want to control our lives how we live what we eat or drink or how we get about
I believe that the reduction of pollution, which includes aerosols, particulates, hydrocarbons,etc has affected ground-based temperature data. Aerosols accelerate cloud formation (shade) and I contend that this effect is more local than global. Reliable historical data from a polluter like China might confirm my suspicion.
Apparently 90% of Earth’s aerosols come from sea spray. That doesn’t kill my argument if those aerosols are considered local to the oceans as well.
Anyone have any thoughts on this?