• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Running On Empty: Biden’s New Power Plant Rules Will Wreck The Nation’s Grid

by William S. Scherman
May 19, 2023, 12:09 PM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
3

coal plantImagine flipping a light switch and not knowing if the lights will come on. Normally unthinkable. But the Environmental Protection Agency’s proposed power-plant rules would destabilize the energy grid, resulting in less-reliable electric service.

The EPA’s aggressive standards require all coal-fired power plants to use a new and still-tricky technology called carbon capture and storage, or CCS, to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions by 90% by 2035, or begin co-firing with natural gas. [emphasis, links added]

In addition, natural-gas-fired plants must capture 90% of emissions by 2035 using CCS or switch almost entirely to hydrogen by 2038. The only other option for both: shut down.

These nascent technologies simply won’t get the job done in the next few years. CCS is used at only one commercial power plant in North America. The only U.S. coal plant to implement CCS successfully closed in 2020 for economic reasons.

CCS holds great promise, but there are significant operational and economic hurdles to its widespread deployment.

The Biden administration recently acknowledged that building and using CCS faces many of the same permitting and regulatory problems plaguing other energy infrastructure.

Likewise, while hydrogen may be a future solution for electricity generation, the science isn’t there.

Hydrogen can be made by one of two methods: electrolysis, which is incredibly costly and energy-intensive; or steam-methane reforming.

Most hydrogen is produced by steam-methane reforming, which produces large amounts of CO2 as a byproduct and doesn’t provide a net reduction in greenhouse gases. The proposed rules all but ignore these obstacles.

Closing the dwindling number of coal-fired plants and most natural-gas-fired plants would drastically affect electric reliability.

In the past 10 years, more than 100,000 megawatts of coal generation capacity was retired. In 2022 total U.S. generating capacity was only 1.2 million megawatts. Another 40,000 megawatts of coal generation is scheduled to close in the next six years.

As the trend continues, natural gas-fired generation will need to play an even larger role in keeping the lights on.

The Energy Information Administration recently forecast that this summer domestic natural-gas consumption for electricity generation will reach the second-highest level on record.

The numbers don’t lie. Biden administration policies mean that higher consumption will be met with substantially lower supply.

In 2022 the U.S. generated 4,243 million megawatt-hours of electricity, including 1,689 million from natural gas and 828 million from coal. If these plants close, that represents a loss of 2,517 million megawatt-hours or 60% of U.S. electric generation.

In 2022 all U.S. renewable resources generated a mere 913 million megawatt-hours. To replace the plants that these new rules would close, the U.S. would need to quadruple its renewable-energy generation in 10 years.

That is to maintain present levels. It doesn’t account for rising energy demand, which is projected to triple worldwide by 2050, including for new hydrogen production and an increasingly electrified vehicle fleet.

Quadrupling renewables will require hundreds of thousands of miles of new long-distance transmission lines, which are difficult to build.

A multiyear backlog for energy-project interconnections means we are still years away from launching transmission projects needed to keep the lights on.

As demonstrated time and again, the EPA doesn’t have electric industry expertise. That is the purview of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), which is charged with keeping the nation’s electric grid reliable and functioning.

A week before the EPA proposed its rules, all four FERC commissioners, Democrats and Republicans alike, told the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee that it isn’t possible in the foreseeable future to maintain a reliable grid without the coal and gas plants targeted by the new rules.

If Republicans and Democrats agree the policy is unworkable, you know we’re in trouble. …

If the EPA’s proposed rules force reliable generating plants to close on Jan. 1, 2032, the unthinkable will happen. Whenever you hit the lights you’ll be crossing your fingers that they actually go on.

After the Clean Power Plan was enacted in 2015, the EPA administrator admitted her plan was to force generators to comply—that is, close—before courts could decide if the rules were legal.

The Supreme Court took note, stayed the plan in 2016, and struck it down in 2022. Regardless of the legality of the new proposed rules, plants will close if they are finalized, unless the courts act swiftly again.

We all hope for a cleaner energy future. But that will take time and thoughtful planning. It will take bipartisan support, not radical proposals. Whatever lofty goals the EPA has, they won’t keep us warm at night when the heat goes off.

Read full post at WSJ

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024
Energy

30-Plus Signs That The Climate Scam Is Collapsing

Apr 09, 2025

Comments 3

  1. SPURWING PLOVER says:
    2 years ago

    Biden like Clinton(Bill)and Obama bases everything on Politics and Junk Science this whole Global Warming/Climate Change Scam

  2. Belford Lester IV says:
    2 years ago

    Cho BuyDin doesn’t care if he destroys the country’s power grid
    Just as long as he is adequately paid and reaps the profits therefrom.
    He just plain doesn’t care
    He is traitorous SCUM

  3. Sonnyhill says:
    2 years ago

    Google the lyrics for “Drive my car” by the Beatles.

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • Newsom at COP30White House Shreds Newsom Over ‘Disrespect’ Remark At COP30 Climate Summit
    Nov 13, 2025
    The Trump administration said Newsom’s COP30 trip was ‘embarrassing’ and mocked his climate stance as Californians face sky-high energy costs. […]
  • Frozen EU USAIcy Silence From Climate Doomers As Controversial Study Warns Of Possible Ice Age
    Nov 13, 2025
    A controversial study warns a collapsing Atlantic current could trigger a new ice age, though AMOC measurements show no ongoing slowdown. […]
  • free speech mouthAt COP30, UN Declares War On Free Speech To Silence Climate Dissent
    Nov 13, 2025
    At COP30, the UN is moving to stifle climate dissent through its Orwellian ‘Information Integrity’ push. […]
  • SCOTUS indoorsSCOTUS Urged To Weigh In On Boulder Climate Lawsuit As Ulterior Motives Unravel
    Nov 13, 2025
    The Supreme Court faces growing calls to review Boulder’s climate case amid revelations of hidden state-level policy goals like a carbon tax. […]
  • COP30 opening ceremonyPoll Shows Voters Skeptical Of COP30 Climate Talks In Brazil
    Nov 12, 2025
    Poll finds Americans largely skeptical of COP30, with major divides by age, party, and race on climate action. […]
  • Newsom cop30Newsom Flies 5,000+ Miles To Slam Trump Over ‘Dumb’ U.S. Climate Policy
    Nov 12, 2025
    At COP30 Brazil, Governor Gavin Newsom cast California as a climate leader while publicly and viciously trashing Trump's policies. […]
  • natural gas flamesAfter Years Of Pushing Costly Green Energy, The Grand Experiment Has Failed
    Nov 12, 2025
    New York approves a much-needed natural gas pipeline, highlighting the collapse of a decades-long bet on expensive renewables. […]
  • independent headlineMeteorologist Refutes The Independent’s Over-The-Top Weather Disaster Claims
    Nov 12, 2025
    A meteorologist says The Independent’s warnings about UK extreme weather don’t align with real data or historical analysis. […]
  • Prince William at COP30Absurdity Reigns At COP30 As Leaders Gaslight On Climate And Energy
    Nov 12, 2025
    Global elites preached ‘climate justice’ while demanding more cash and control, exposing the hypocrisy driving their energy agenda. […]
  • Gavin Newsom Sao PaoloNewsom Accuses Trump Of Giving Brazil The ‘Middle Finger’ With Tariffs, Skipping COP30
    Nov 11, 2025
    Newsom blasted Trump for slapping tariffs on Brazil over human rights abuses and skipping COP30, calling it a diplomatic ‘middle finger.’ […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky