• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Eco-Frauds: Prince Harry And Meghan Take Private Jet To Ibiza For 5-Day Vacay

by ALEXANDER ROBERTSON
August 15, 2019, 10:00 AM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 5 mins read
A A
3
Share on FacebookShare on XwitterShare on Linkedin

Prince Harry Meghan beachThe Duke and Duchess of Sussex enjoyed a secret trip to Ibiza on a private jet to celebrate Meghan’s birthday – despite their persistent posturing about being green.

Meghan, who turned 38 on August 4, is thought to have flown to the island with Harry, 34, on what would have been three-month-old Archie’s first holiday.

The royal couple and Archie stayed in a secluded villa away from prying eyes, and traveled with security personnel for the ‘six-day trip’.

The royals landed in Ibiza on Tuesday last week with several taxpayer-funded Met Police bodyguards who appear to have handed over to five Spanish close protection officers who took them to their private villa.

The couple’s decision to use a private jet for their Ibiza trip means the journey emitted six times more carbon dioxide per person than a scheduled flight from London to the Spanish island. The flights there and back would have given out 12.5 tons of carbon dioxide.

There are around 14 scheduled flights from London and the South-East of England to Ibiza each day.

Their choice of transport flies in the face of their frequent public pronouncements on green issues.

Last month British Vogue magazine – guest-edited by the duchess – published an interview by Harry with leading conservationist Dr. Jane Goodall.

In it, the prince suggested that he and Meghan may only have two children because of their environmental concerns.

SEE ALSO: The Seriously Dodgy Pseudoscience Behind The Anti-Birth Crusade

In contrast to the duke and duchess, climate change activist Greta Thunberg yesterday boarded a boat from England to New York because she refuses to travel by plane. The 16-year-old was one of the 15 ‘forces for change’ Meghan chose to put on the cover of Vogue.

By taking a private jet, the privacy-obsessed royal couple – whose son was born in May – were able to fly in and out of Ibiza incognito. The cost of taking a private plane ranges from £12,000 to £20,000 one way – so up to £40,000 return.

Critics have blasted their private jet trip as hypocritical.

Former UKIP MEP Patrick O’Flynn said: ‘This is really, really, really bad PR. It is the kind of ‘do as I say, not as I do’ behavior that the British public detests.’

Friends of the Earth spokesman Aaron Kiely said: ‘The Duke of Sussex speaks wonderful and stirring words on the environment and then he flies off on holiday to a European destination in a private jet.

‘He could have taken a train and then a boat. This would have been the perfect opportunity to set an environmental example.’

The holiday came just days after Prince Harry attended Camp Google in Sicily on July 31 after the tech giant flew him out for its celebrity climate summit.

MailOnline asked Buckingham Palace if the prince had traveled to Majorca directly from Sicily via private plane, but a spokesman refused to comment.

While in Sicily, Harry is said to have delivered an impassioned speech to other A-list names about the environment and humanitarianism while barefoot.

He is also understood to have stayed on a gas-guzzling superyacht moored near the exclusive Verdura Golf and Spa Resort where the climate change retreat was held.

Other guests were reported to include Leonardo DiCaprio, who runs his own environmental foundation, supermodel Naomi Campbell, fashion designer Stella McCartney, and singer Harry Styles.

Meghan’s birthday followed four days later, but it is unknown whether or not Harry returned to the UK before joining his family or whether he met them in Ibiza.

Should Harry have flown directly to Ibiza from Palermo, via a private jet with five passengers, it would have put around a tonne of carbon into the atmosphere.

If he did return home from Palermo, a flight to the UK would have used up about 1.3 tonnes of CO2, while a flight from London to Ibiza would use about 0.8 tonnes.

A source told Majorca Daily Bulletin: ‘No images have emerged of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex and Archie, who stayed at a villa well away from the cameras.

‘They traveled with security personnel, and it is reported that local security forces were not needed.’

Ibiza holds a special place in Meghan’s memories, as she first traveled there with a group of friends in 2016, including Misha Nonoo, before she met Prince Harry.

Questions over how the couple traveled to the Spanish island are likely to reignite criticism the prince faced over his attendance at Camp Google late last month.

Sources told the Mail On Sunday that Google paid for a private jet and a helicopter to ferry Prince Harry from London to Palmero for the summit, as environmental groups blasted the meeting for hypocrisy.

While Buckingham Palace has refused to confirm whether or not the prince attended the event, sources said a plane was chartered to bring the royal to Palmero airport.

A helicopter then whisked him onwards to the luxury resort of Verdura for the summit, all paid for by Google.

If Harry did travel via private jet, it would have put around three tonnes of carbon into the atmosphere – ten times more than going via commercial airliner.

In order to offset just the one-way plane ticket, Harry would need to plant around 190 trees, environmental group Trees for the Future said.

SEE ALSO: Backlash At Prince Harry And Hypocrite Eco-Celebs At Secret Climate Google Camp

When pressed whether Harry had flown commercial or private, the CEO of Palermo airport Giovanni Scalia said: ‘Being royalty you can guess which.’

Critics questioned why the tech giant had used transport with massive carbon footprints to arrive at a climate change event.

Italian media reported that 114 private jets were scheduled to land in Palermo during the summit, although it was not clear if they were all chartered for guests – dubbed the ‘Greenerati’.

Google did not respond to requests for comment.

Harry has warned about the ‘terrifying’ effects of climate change on the world when he revealed this month that he and wife Meghan had decided to limit their family to two children.

Harry is also believed to have stayed in a superyacht along with other ‘VIP guests’ during the summit.

According to experts, a 390ft super-yacht produces about 3.3 tons of damaging carbon dioxide each hour at sea by burning through around 200 gallons of fuel.

Vessels spotted during the Google Camp – an annual event launched by the tech giant’s founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin in 2012 –included the 300ft Eos, owned by Expedia billionaire Barry Diller, and Infinity, the 290ft yacht belonging to former Google boss Eric Schmidt.

Mr. Diller, 77, denied Harry, 34, had joined celebrities including Katy Perry and Orlando Bloom on his yacht but praised the Prince’s ‘eloquent’ speech about trying to save the planet by taking fewer selfies.

‘He was saying there are many holiday destinations that because of Instagram and other things are getting trampled by people taking selfies, and these places… are overwhelmed with tourism,’ Mr. Diller told The Mail on Sunday.

‘The principal argument he was making was the need to actually expand people’s interest in places that are not so obviously ‘selfie-ized’.

‘It should be a goal to expand where people go for tourism, so these very few places with an enormous concentration of tourists would get some relief.’

Read more at Daily Mail

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Skype
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky

Join our list

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.

We respect your privacy and take protecting it seriously

Related Posts

Extreme Weather

Meteorologist Exposes How Warmer Nights, Not Hotter Days, Skew Heated Climate Claims

Jun 04, 2025
Energy

‘Stop Whining’: Schwarzenegger Rebukes Eco Activists Freaking Out Over Trump Agenda

Jun 04, 2025
Money & Finance

DC Mayor Bowser Faces Ethics Complaint Over Qatari-Funded Trip To UN Climate Summit

Jun 04, 2025

Comments 3

  1. Shoki Kaneda says:
    6 years ago

    Rules for thee, but not for me. These anachronistic vestiges of hereditary privilege should have been given the heave long ago.

  2. Sonnyhill says:
    6 years ago

    Amber is no monarchist.
    How many tourists, burning how many megatonnes of kerosene, fly to London to rub against “royalty”
    Monty Python, where are you when we need you?

  3. Amber says:
    6 years ago

    Well they are Royalty after all .
    Hasn’t it always been that way .
    Do as I say peasant .
    At least in this case the jet fuel will do absolutely nothing to effect the
    climate but they know that two .
    It’s all part of the move to eliminate the middle class and genocide the poor through high fuel prices .
    This is old hat . The English did the same thing to the Irish . Starve and freeze them out . When they didn’t want to feed prisoners they put them on ships and dumped them in Australia. Some things just don’t change .
    i think it’s all part of the distraction for Prince Andrew hanging with young Epstein “massage therapists” .
    I wounder if it was the same guys that “robbed ” Seth Rich … of his life .
    Another Clinton collateral clean up job .

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • beach summerMeteorologist Exposes How Warmer Nights, Not Hotter Days, Skew Heated Climate Claims
    Jun 4, 2025
    Axios blames climate change for hotter summers, but warmer nights, not hotter days, drive that trend. The real heat story isn't what it seems. […]
  • Schwarzenegger at Austrian World Summit‘Stop Whining’: Schwarzenegger Rebukes Eco Activists Freaking Out Over Trump Agenda
    Jun 4, 2025
    Arnold Schwarzenegger has a message for environmentalists who despair at Trump's approach to climate change: 'Stop whining and get to work.' […]
  • muriel bowserDC Mayor Bowser Faces Ethics Complaint Over Qatari-Funded Trip To UN Climate Summit
    Jun 4, 2025
    DC Mayor Bowser faces an ethics complaint over a Qatari-funded 2023 Dubai climate conference trip, allegedly violating donation laws. […]
  • cityscape sunStudy Finds Urbanization Behind Rising Temps, Torching Media’s Overheated Climate Claims
    Jun 3, 2025
    New study finds urban heat island may explain most temperature rise—casting doubt on media’s heat wave panic and the push to phase out fossil fuels. […]
  • armed epa agentsHouse Panel Investigates Biden’s EPA, DOJ For Targeting Businesses Over Climate Change
    Jun 3, 2025
    House panel is probing Biden’s EPA and DOJ for targeting small businesses with consent decrees, lawsuits, and 'sue and settle' crackdowns. […]
  • tesla superchargers stationNew Jersey Boots Tesla EV Superchargers Off Turnpike As Dems Target Musk
    Jun 3, 2025
    New Jersey removes Tesla Superchargers from Turnpike amid political feud over DOGE and Elon Musk's federal waste initiative. […]
  • Escaping The HeatGermany’s Scorching Summer of 1911 Undermines Today’s Heat Hysteria
    Jun 3, 2025
    Germany’s scorching summer of 1911 shows extreme heat and droughts long predate any so-called CO2 fears. […]
  • solar farm panelsGlobal Revolt: Over 1,000 Green Energy Projects Rejected Worldwide
    Jun 3, 2025
    Global communities reject 1,000+ renewable projects due to land conflicts, habitat destruction, and environmental concerns despite net-zero push. […]
  • alaska pipelineAlaskans Praise Trump’s Push To Reverse Biden’s Sweeping Drilling Ban
    Jun 2, 2025
    Trump officials move to reverse Biden’s Alaska drilling ban, siding with Native leaders and opening millions of acres to energy development. […]
  • kudzo vines old houseAugusta Chronicle’s Climate-Invasive Species Claim Refuted By Georgia Data
    Jun 2, 2025
    Georgia data shows climate change isn’t boosting invasive plants over native species, debunking Augusta Chronicle’s false claims. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts by email either instantly or daily. Check your Junk folder for any verification emails upon subscribing.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books We Like

very convenient warming

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

Share via
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Climate Change Dispatch