• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

President Biden Must End His Radical Green Agenda

by Larry Behrens
May 20, 2021, 9:30 AM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
6

gasoline trucker stationIf we allow President Joe Biden to continue promoting the radical green agenda unchecked, long gasoline lines won’t be the only problem families will face.

Americans in the eastern part of the country are just now learning the hard way how critical our energy infrastructure is to their lives.

By asking the simple question “where does my gasoline come from?” we get a glimpse behind the complex network of oil production, refining, and delivery that literally drives our global economy.

Thanks to the infrastructure that includes pipelines, generations of Americans are accustomed to readily available gasoline.

The Biden/Harris Administration is rightfully taking criticism for their anti-pipeline stance as gas lines form and prices skyrocket.

As unfortunate as it is to have a massive disruption at the gas pump, President Biden’s green ambitions have a bigger target: our electricity grid.

President Biden has vowed to place our country on a whole new electrical power source in just the next 14 years.

By forcing our country to rely on wind and solar for something as critical as our electricity, President Biden is making one of two things clear: he knows he’s making false promises just to keep the radical left-wing of the Democratic Party appeased, or he doesn’t understand how electricity works.

Unfortunately, I fear it’s the latter.

In a recent white paper I authored titled, Lights Out: How Green Mandates Are Undermining the Affordability and Reliability of Electricity, I closely examine three states that have, to varying degrees, embraced energy plans similar to the Biden/Harris Administration’s proposal and the disastrous consequences.

The inspiration for the energy future President Biden wants is California. Leaders in the Golden State have been bowing to radical environmentalists for years and the rest of America needs to examine the results.

California is shutting down its natural gas and nuclear power generation in the name of being carbon-free.

However, California’s dirty little secret is the fact that it’s forced to import 30 percent or even more of its electricity from other states who generate power from the reliable energy sources environmentalists are shutting down.

As seen last summer, this green shell game dearly costs Californians in both affordability and reliability.

The working families and small business owners of California have seen their electric bills rise by 30 percent in less than a decade, a growth rate that is seven times higher than the rest of the United States.

In return for paying a premium price for power, the people of California are rewarded with blackouts.

Just as former California Sen. Kamala Harris was selected to join Biden on his presidential ticket, and a sweltering heatwave hit the state, the green agenda’s plan for electricity was delivered a dose of reality when over 400,000 homes lost power.

No word on if Vice President Harris’ home was impacted.

Paying higher prices for electricity that can be derailed by the setting sun or clouds is the future President Biden is really presenting to America. What President Biden and his eco-leftist allies count on is their belief Americans are too naive to figure it out.

Of course, the Biden/Harris Administration will scream it’s all about the environment, but “private jet” John Kerry himself said if the United States could somehow get to zero emissions by tomorrow, it wouldn’t make much of a difference because about 90 percent of the global emissions come from outside our country.

Biden/Harris Administration officials like Kerry will keep driving massive taxpayer-funded black SUVs while jet-setting across the globe. And when the next rolling blackout hits our country, their lives will continue to be just fine.

I offer a simple challenge: President Biden should put the White House on 100 percent carbon-free energy tomorrow.

That would mean no carbon backup to his solar panels and his presidential motorcade would need to be all-electric cars with 100 percent of their charging power coming from wind and solar.

President Biden needs to live in the same conditions he expects for the rest of America. Perhaps when he finds he can’t make a video call on a cloudy day or the White House press briefings are being done by candlelight, more Americans will begin to understand the pitfalls of President Biden’s unreliable energy future.

Maybe then will President Biden heed the warning about the inevitable future failures of the radical green agenda.

Read more at RealClearEnergy

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024
Energy

30-Plus Signs That The Climate Scam Is Collapsing

Apr 09, 2025

Comments 6

  1. Spurwing Plover says:
    5 years ago

    The stuff they make those batteries from has to be dug up for the ground

  2. Rosco says:
    5 years ago

    Electricity accounts for less than one third of emissions.
    Where are the electric combine harvesters, tractors, trucks, ships, bulldozers, planes and other machines a modern civilisation relies on ?
    The whole idea it is necessary to destroy civilisation because of ~420 molecules of CO2 in every million molecules of ordinary air is stupid beyond belief !

    • David Lewis says:
      5 years ago

      Rosco, of the items you listed semi trucks are the only area where there is a viable electric model. A new diesel semi runs around $165,000. Tesla said the price for its Semi will start at $150,000 for a model with a 300-mile range, and $180,000 for a 500-mile range. It has similar load capacity. However, this is only for companies that buy new trucks. The cost of battery replacement will price these out of reach of companies that usually buy used trucks.

      Farmers need trucks smaller than semi’s and larger than pickups for much of their harvesting. I doubt any are under development. There is a combine harvester that uses electric drive motors, but it needs to carry a diesel powered generator for the electric power. There is an electric drive bulldozer with the same limitation. An all electric tractor exists but it doesn’t have the capacity to do a full day of hard work. Ships and planes obviously can’t function without fossil fuels. Those planning net zero are probably aware of the needs of planes and ship but they haven’t proposed any viable solutions. With their high degree of incompetence I suspect they are not even aware of the other machines our civilization needs.

  3. David Lewis says:
    5 years ago

    California’s need to import power will exceed 30% as they continue to shut down fossil and nuclear plants. It is perhaps feasible for the entire nation to follow the California model. All that would be necessary is to have Mexico and Canada do a massive build up of fossil fuel power plants. At a high cost we could import power from our neighbors and rationalize that we have “saved the world” because the emissions are not accruing in the US. This concept is already being used in Europe as industries flee the EU’s high cost of power and then the products are imported. Canada might have a problem since Trudeau has bought into the climate change fraud, but money from selling power provides a strong motivation for rationalization. Canada could claim since the power is being used in the US, the emissions don’t count for Canada’s total. A real issue would be billions of dollars worth of transmission lines would have to be built.

  4. Dave O says:
    5 years ago

    “No word on if Vice President Harris’ home was impacted.”
    She most likely has a whole-house generator powered by hydrocarbons (Nat gas, diesel, gasoline). So rich elites like her don’t care if commoners have to struggle with electric black-outs.

  5. Spurwing Plover says:
    5 years ago

    Of course being a Dictator like Biden he will never have to worry about long gas lines since he still gets his Fossil Fuels and its the American People who pays the Bills

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • fuvahmulah island maldivesNew Scientist Misses The Science On ‘Sinking Pacific Islands’
    Jan 16, 2026
    Real-world data show many Pacific atolls are stable or growing, contradicting claims of inevitable sea-level submergence. […]
  • hochul energy cliffNew York’s Climate Act Goes Nuclear: Bold Promises, Zero Progress
    Jan 16, 2026
    New York’s Climate Act promises bold energy goals, but seven years in any progress is nonexistent and nuclear plans lag way behind. […]
  • Global disaster counts remain flat over 25 years, despite rising CO2 and record temperaturesA Climatologist Asks: Where Are All The Climate-Related Disasters?
    Jan 16, 2026
    Despite record CO2 and global temperatures, climate-related disasters haven’t increased—what the data really show. […]
  • miliband offshore wind ahoy mateyThe Climate Scaremongers: ‘Record’ Offshore Wind Auction Will Add Billions To UK Power Bills
    Jan 16, 2026
    Despite “record” claims, offshore wind contracts rely on heavy subsidies that will push UK electricity bills even higher. […]
  • Twenty Years Later, An Inconvenient Truth Fails to Hold UpTwenty Years On, Al Gore’s ‘An Inconvenient Truth’ Thoroughly Debunked
    Jan 15, 2026
    Twenty years later, Al Gore’s ‘An Inconvenient Truth’ predictions, from Kilimanjaro to glaciers, have failed to materialize. […]
  • bbcBBC Pushes 12% Pay Cut Claim Built On Hypothetical Models, Not Actual Data
    Jan 15, 2026
    BBC claims climate change is cutting U.S. pay by 12%. A meteorologist shows why the data tells a very different story. […]
  • Kamala Harris seaside mansionKamala Buys $8M Malibu Mansion Despite Her Climate Warnings About Rising Seas
    Jan 15, 2026
    Kamala buys $8.2M Malibu mansion near beaches she warned could flood from rising seas and extreme weather. […]
  • sun hazeWhy Blotting Out The Sun Borders On Climate Madness
    Jan 15, 2026
    When green groups try to block the sun, the risks to wildlife, crops, and climate show the sheer folly of solar geoengineering. […]
  • homeowners insurance policy court gavelBlue States Push Climate Liability Bills That Would Hike Costs For Consumers
    Jan 15, 2026
    Blue states are pushing climate liability bills that could make homeowners pay more while targeting energy companies. […]
  • supreme court buildingSCOTUS Weighs Whether Oil Companies Can Shift Climate Lawsuits To Federal Court
    Jan 14, 2026
    Justices weighed whether oil companies can move climate lawsuits to federal court, while warning of a potential exodus from state tort cases. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky