• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Porkapalooza II: Biden Rolls Out $2.25T Spending Spree For Infrastructure

by David Sherfinski
March 31, 2021, 1:58 PM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
5
Share on FacebookShare on XwitterShare on Linkedin

biden g7 virtualPresident Biden is rolling out a $2.25 trillion plan on Wednesday that would overhaul U.S. infrastructure such as roads and bridges, pour billions of dollars into retrofitting housing and transit with an eye toward climate change, and create new jobs for caregivers of the elderly and disabled, among other priorities.

The proposal, dubbed the “American Jobs Plan,” is supposed to be funded in part by hiking the U.S. corporate tax rate from 21% to 28%. The administration estimated that the overall package will generate millions of jobs.

The White House estimated that the spending, most of which is doled out over an eight-year period, would be paid for over a 15-year period if Congress passes the package alongside the president’s desired tax increases.

“We think that these are investments that, as a country, we cannot afford not to make,” an administration official told reporters on a call previewing the plan. “At the same time, the president feels that the right, responsible thing is to identify how we could pay for these investments across time.”

The proposal released Wednesday is the first part of Mr. Biden’s next major domestic legislative priority after Congress approved his $1.9 trillion coronavirus relief package earlier this month.

A second package that includes additional spending on health care, child care, and what some advocates call “human infrastructure” is supposed to be released in the coming weeks.

Mr. Biden is set to travel to Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, on Wednesday afternoon to talk in more detail about the first part of the plan, which includes:

• $620 billion for transportation infrastructure.
• $650 billion for broadband, clean water, the electric grid, and affordable housing.
• $400 billion for caregiving initiatives for seniors and the disabled.
• $580 billion for research and development, manufacturing, and training.

In addition to the corporate tax rate hike, the president wants to finance the new spending plans by increasing the global minimum tax rate applied to U.S. corporations from about 10.5% to 21%, imposing a minimum 15% tax on income companies use to report profits, or “book income,” and eliminating tax breaks for fossil fuel companies, among other changes to the tax code.

The White House estimated that the tax increases would generate more than $2 trillion over the next 15 years and reduce the debt in the long run.

The package released Wednesday is not paired with other tax hikes on individuals that Mr. Biden has floated like increasing the top individual income tax rate from 37% to 39.6% and increasing capital gains taxes on earnings of more than $1 million.

The White House has said that individuals and families earning less than $400,000 per year will not see their taxes increase under the president’s plans, though analysts project that hiking the corporate rate would indirectly hit people under that threshold through higher utility bills and hits to retirement savings accounts.

The infrastructure portion of the plan includes $115 billion to modernize bridges, highways, and roads and more than $170 billion to boost electric vehicle production.

Mr. Biden also wants Congress to authorize $45 billion for eliminating all lead pipes and service lines, $100 billion for expanding high-speed broadband to rural and underserved areas, $100 billion for modernizing the U.S. electric grid, and more than $200 billion to “produce, preserve, and retrofit” affordable housing with an eye toward energy efficiency and climate change.

The plan calls for expanded access to long-term care services under Medicaid, which the White House expects to open up additional job opportunities.

Mr. Biden called on Congress to put $35 billion toward climate-related research and development, $50 billion into semiconductor manufacturing and research, and more than $50 billion to try to increase access to capital for domestic manufacturing.

The plan includes a call to expand collective bargaining rights for public sector workers and endorses House-passed legislation that would make it easier for workplaces to unionize and would authorize stiffer penalties for companies that violate workers’ rights, among other changes.

Congressional Democrats could try to muscle through parts of the plan without Republican support, as they did for Mr. Biden’s $1.9 trillion relief package, though the White House has started conducting outreach to both Democrats and Republicans on Capitol Hill on the proposal.

“He’s open to hearing what others think, but what he is uncompromising about is the urgency of the moment and the need to really deliver for the American people,” the administration official said.

Staff members for Senate Majority Leader Charles E. Schumer of New York are exploring whether Democrats can leverage a fast-track budget tool, typically used no more than once a year, as many as three times before the 2022 midterms to get the president’s agenda through.

The tool, known as reconciliation, would allow Democrats to get legislation through the 50-50 split Senate on a simple majority vote, sidestepping the typical 60-vote threshold to break a filibuster. Democrats have effective control thanks to the tie-breaking vote of Vice President Kamala Harris.

It’s the same process Democrats used to pass Mr. Biden’s $1.9 trillion relief package without GOP support.

Senate Republicans are essentially unified against any new major tax increases, leaving Democrats with no votes to spare in the Senate and few votes to spare in the House if they can’t win Republican support.

Republicans say they’re not going to be hoodwinked into voting for an infrastructure package that’s financed by tax increases Democrats jam through on their own in a separate bill.

Liberals and moderate Democrats generally swallowed their criticisms of the $1.9 trillion relief package and voted yes, but it could be a different story for the infrastructure and tax proposals.

Several House Democrats have already said they won’t vote for Mr. Biden’s tax plans unless they fully restore a state and local tax deduction prized by their well-off constituents in blue states like New York, New Jersey, and California.

Liberal members are also offering their own climate proposals, some of which are more far-reaching than moderate Senate Democrats such as Joe Manchin III of West Virginia are likely willing to support.

Read rest at Washington Times

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky

Join our list

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.

We respect your privacy and take protecting it seriously

Related Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

It’s Official! Trump Nixes California’s Electric Vehicle Mandate

Jun 12, 2025
Extreme Weather

CNN Blames Climate Change For Man-Made Disasters In Deceptive Photo Essay

Jun 12, 2025
Energy

California’s Ivanpah Solar Plant Shutting Down Over High Costs, Low Output

Jun 12, 2025

Comments 5

  1. Spurwing Plover says:
    4 years ago

    PORK PORK PORK gose the Democrat More Pork

  2. Spurwing Plover says:
    4 years ago

    The Democ-Rats have the keys to the Public’s Money Bin and their going on a spending spree lead by Biden the Worst

  3. Randy Verret says:
    4 years ago

    I’ll re-post my comment on another article on this site from earlier today:

    Joe Biden will be in Pittsburgh today to unveil his $2T “Build Back Better” infrastructure plan. Looking at the preliminary details disclosed from the White House yesterday, my head almost exploded. Basically, the U.S government has foolishly decided they are the best allocator of resources, strategy & energy development rather than industry experts, consumers & markets. In effect, progressive Democrats, environmental activists & their media enablers will (now) dictate & determine the direction of our energy transition & fate of our domestic economy. My prediction is this will prove to be one of the biggest strategic blunders & COLASSAL wastes of taxpayer dollars in our nations history. Most likely, it will blow through the Senate on budget reconciliation without ANY thoughtful & informed debate & the American public won’t even blink an eye. Bluntly, the old song line comes to mind…”I see a bad moon rising.”

  4. David Lewis says:
    4 years ago

    As we use less fossil fuels, the cost of energy will increase. In Europe that has driven industry to nations with lower energy costs. Now in the US add increasing the corporate tax rate from 21% to 28%, and companies have an additional motivation to leave. The world is full of nations that will welcome them with sweet deals.

  5. HawkDriver says:
    4 years ago

    How much of the $2.25 T ends up in Politicians pockets?

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • President Trump signs resolutions against California's electric vehicle mandates.It’s Official! Trump Nixes California’s Electric Vehicle Mandate
    Jun 12, 2025
    Trump ends Biden’s electric vehicle mandate, restoring consumer choice and rolling back California’s influence on national transportation policy. […]
  • cnn photo essayCNN Blames Climate Change For Man-Made Disasters In Deceptive Photo Essay
    Jun 12, 2025
    CNN uses emotional photos to push a climate narrative, but the real causes are poor policy, bad planning, and human neglect—not climate. […]
  • Ivanpah Solar FarmCalifornia’s Ivanpah Solar Plant Shutting Down Over High Costs, Low Output
    Jun 12, 2025
    California’s $2.2B solar gamble flops as Ivanpah shuts down early, while the Diablo Canyon nuclear plant quietly powers on. […]
  • Sierra Club protestSierra Club, Major Green Groups Cut Jobs As Trump Scraps Climate Programs
    Jun 12, 2025
    Sierra Club and other green groups have cut jobs as Trump kills green energy policies amid a shifting climate activism landscape. […]
  • Lee ZeldinTrump EPA Overturns Biden-Era Rules That Would Close Coal, Gas Plants
    Jun 12, 2025
    Trump’s EPA scraps Biden-era rules targeting coal and gas plants, citing energy costs, grid risks, and regulatory overreach. […]
  • NASA MSU satelliteClimatologist Details How NASA GISS And Climate.gov Drain Taxpayer Dollars
    Jun 11, 2025
    Taxpayer-funded agencies like NASA GISS and NOAA are pushing climate fear to secure funding, blurring the line between science and advocacy. […]
  • coal terminal shipCoal Strikes Back: Trump’s Big Energy Bet Paying Off
    Jun 11, 2025
    Trump greenlights massive coal expansion to boost exports to the Indo-Pacific, reviving U.S. energy policy and global leverage. […]
  • Nigeria flood aftermathMedia Blame Nigerian Floods On Climate Change But Overlook Key Causes
    Jun 11, 2025
    Nigeria’s deadly floods were driven by poor urban planning and infrastructure, not climate change, despite media claims to the contrary. […]
  • electricity linesBlue State Govs Blame Grid Operator For Self-Inflicted Energy Crisis
    Jun 11, 2025
    Dem-led blue states are blaming the grid operator for sykrocking energy costs for an energy crisis that they created. […]
  • Heinz KetchupBillions Wasted: The 5 Worst Green-Energy Projects That Biden Funded
    Jun 10, 2025
    Biden admin approved billions in wasteful green spending—from EV megasites and Exxon hydrogen grants to climate-friendly ketchup upgrades. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts by email either instantly or daily. Check your Junk folder for any verification emails upon subscribing.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books We Like

very convenient warming

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

Share via
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Climate Change Dispatch