• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

POLL: Most Americans Won’t Spend $10 A Month To Fight Climate Change

by Valerie Richardson
January 25, 2019, 12:19 PM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 2 mins read
A A
11

Ocasio-Cortez green protest twMost Americans are willing to chip in a buck each month to help fight climate change, but they draw the line at $10.

A poll conducted by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research found that 57 percent of Americans would vote for a $1 fee added to their monthly electricity bill to “combat climate change,” but only 28 percent would agree to pay an additional $10 per month.

“To combat climate change, 57 percent of Americans are willing to pay a $1 monthly fee; 23 percent are willing to pay a monthly fee of $40,” said the analysis released Tuesday.

“Party identification and acceptance of climate change are the main determining factors of whether or not people are willing to pay, with Democrats being consistently more inclined to pay a fee.”

The question began with $1, then $10, and rose after that in $10 increments, but a majority of those polled opposed every amount more than $1. By the time the figure reached $100 per month, just 16 percent said yes and 82 percent said no.

Climate change also ranked at the bottom of a list of policy priorities, behind the economy, health care, terrorism, immigration, and energy policy. (SEE ALSO: NBC’s Al Roker Thrilled By Online Poll Showing Climate Concern)

The lack of interest came even though 71 percent agreed that “climate change is happening.” Of those, 45 percent said it was caused “mostly by human activities.”

The survey was conducted Nov. 14-18 with 1,202 U.S. adults 18 and older from all 50 states, with a plus or minus 3.9 percent margin of sampling error.

Read rest at Washington Times

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Bipolar

New Study: Ice Core Data Shows Modern Warming Is Statistically Unremarkable

Mar 05, 2026
Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024

Comments 11

  1. Gus says:
    7 years ago

    There is really no evidence at all of any “climate change” beyond its natural variability[1]. I wouldn’t worry about any of it at all, and I wouldn’t spend even one cent on any claimed “remedies.” People who throw tantrums over this issue are mostly scientifically illiterate and ideologically engaged ignorants, political demagogues, and the like. Not the kind of people who deserve respect.

    [1] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2018.10.020

  2. Dan Pangburn says:
    7 years ago

    Water vapor (TPW) has increased by twice the amount calculated from temperature increase of the liquid surface water. Both changed slope trend from uptrend to flat about 2002-2005. The flat was interrupted by the el Nino which peaked in Jan 2016. Both TPW and average global temperature are still in downtrend. Global Warming appears to be over.

    Is all that snow/rain just bad weather or is the TPW increase a factor?
    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DxYl0-fUcAALEW2.jpg

  3. Yonason says:
    7 years ago

    I seem to have posted this comment to another article somehow. Not sure how I managed that. Sorry.

    This if for this article:

    Not a penny to those scam artists!

    Humans can’t control the climate, we can only respond to it. The poorer we are made by their crooked schemes, the less we’ll be able to deal with any real emergency, if it arises.

  4. john from michigan says:
    7 years ago

    I wouldn’t give a nickel to give up US sovereignty to an international entity run by the United Nations, and that’s what “climate change” is all about. It has nothing to do with climate. It I all about redistributing American wealth and destroying capitalism (which is the source of America’s wealth). Anyone donating to fight “climate change” is being swindled. Their money is not going to where they think it is going.

  5. Squidly says:
    7 years ago

    Not only would I not contribute a single dime to “fight climate change” .. I demand these morons PAY ME every month for just suggesting the moronic absurdity of “fighting climate change”.

  6. Spurwing Plover says:
    7 years ago

    By their term Green Jobs dose that mean like working at some job for DiCaprio or Gore carrying and deliverying everything from Micro-chips to deck top computers on your bicycle? Bike Messengers when the way of the Pony Express and may cities banned Bicycle messengers after too many accidents and beside bike messengers were rude and wreckless and stupid

  7. Sonnyhill says:
    7 years ago

    AO-C’S “green jobs for all ” slogan gave me an idea. She could start a fashion craze by wearing green jeans. Her fans would create green jobs, buying green jeans and burning their blue jeans in public. The MSM media would give her even more free air time. GREEN JEANS FOR ALL, T-Shirts and hats, too.
    Then everyone would know who stood for what. Red Make America Great Again hats versus Green Jeans For All.
    Let’s rumble.

    • Graham McDonald says:
      7 years ago

      Need to get me a yellow vest…..

  8. Sonnyhill says:
    7 years ago

    Futures contracts for power delivered in New York state in 2021 are 30% higher than present rates. Why? NY is closing its coal-fired generators.
    Eventually, people decide to move to states where taxes and energy are reasonable. Texas is winning this contest. The warmer climate seems inconsequential. Huh…..

  9. David Lewis says:
    7 years ago

    If this data were presented on some talk shows, 57% would be willing to pay a dollar a month would be translated to “the majority of Americans are willing to pay to fight climate change.” The implication would be most Americans would be willing to pay a high price. It is obvious that the majority wouldn’t be willing to pay a 25 cent per gallon surcharge on gas either. Yet, a number of Democratic candidates are running with climate change as one of their main issues. You can bet that the programs they will be proposing will cost considerably more than ten dollars a month.

  10. Spurwing Plover says:
    7 years ago

    Lets see the Eco-Wackos and their celeberty supporters put their money where their mouths are and pay a little extra for those jet trips all over the globe and producing all that CO2 and hyporicy

Stay Connected!

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Get notified when new posts are published!

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Recent Posts

  • Hot sun hangs over city.Juicing The Numbers: How Temperature Data Got A Performance Boost
    Mar 16, 2026
    NASA's temperature baseline, data homogenization, and urban heat islands are juicing the numbers behind every "hottest year ever" claim. […]
  • mandami hochul congestion taxNYC Congestion Tax Has Race-Based Carveouts—And That May Be Illegal
    Mar 16, 2026
    NYC’s congestion pricing program includes special treatment for ethnic minorities, but not for non-minorities, which is likely illegal. […]
  • xi jinping conferenceChina Using Nonprofit Networks To Attack American Energy, Report Suggests
    Mar 16, 2026
    China-linked nonprofits funneled millions to Earthjustice as the group targeted Louisiana energy projects, a Pelican Institute report finds. […]
  • coffee bean plantation thrivingClimate Alarm Brews False Coffee Crisis As Global Production Sets Records
    Mar 13, 2026
    An activist group's study claims warming is devastating coffee crops, but real data shows output has more than doubled globally since 1995. […]
  • Trump EPA Moves To Reverse Biden’s Climate-Fueled Crackdown On Device Sterilization Gas
    Mar 13, 2026
    Trump’s EPA moves to scrap Biden’s strict ethylene oxide rule, warning it risked medical device shortages while keeping longstanding emissions limits. […]
  • wind turbine blades landfillBarclays Report Warns Renewable Energy Could Become Next ‘Stranded Asset’
    Mar 13, 2026
    Barclays report warns renewables face stranded-asset risk as grid bottlenecks, curtailment, and energy security challenge Net Zero viability. […]
  • movie floods sea levelNew Study Finds 90% Of Sea Level Research Relies On Models, Not Real Measurements
    Mar 13, 2026
    A review of 385 studies finds 90% relied on model assumptions rather than real coastal measurements. […]
  • hochul press eventNY Assembly Won’t Ease Climate Law, Floats $500 Energy Rebates For Soaring Bills
    Mar 12, 2026
    Hochul seeks to scale back the CLCPA as NY Assembly proposes $500 energy rebates to offset rising utility costs. […]
  • ursula von der leyenEU Chief Admits Europe’s Nuclear Phaseout Was A ‘Strategic Mistake’
    Mar 12, 2026
    EU chief Ursula von der Leyen admits Europe’s nuclear phaseout was a “strategic mistake” that contributed to high energy prices and reliance on imports. […]
  • time magTIME’s ‘Faster Than Ever’ Warming Claim Collides With Satellite Temperature Data
    Mar 12, 2026
    Satellite temperature data show steady global warming since 1979 with no post-2015 acceleration, contradicting TIME’s “faster than ever” claim. […]

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

Climate prn book

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky