• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

POLL: Most Americans Won’t Spend $10 A Month To Fight Climate Change

by Valerie Richardson
January 25, 2019, 12:19 PM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 2 mins read
A A
11

Ocasio-Cortez green protest twMost Americans are willing to chip in a buck each month to help fight climate change, but they draw the line at $10.

A poll conducted by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research found that 57 percent of Americans would vote for a $1 fee added to their monthly electricity bill to “combat climate change,” but only 28 percent would agree to pay an additional $10 per month.

“To combat climate change, 57 percent of Americans are willing to pay a $1 monthly fee; 23 percent are willing to pay a monthly fee of $40,” said the analysis released Tuesday.

“Party identification and acceptance of climate change are the main determining factors of whether or not people are willing to pay, with Democrats being consistently more inclined to pay a fee.”

The question began with $1, then $10, and rose after that in $10 increments, but a majority of those polled opposed every amount more than $1. By the time the figure reached $100 per month, just 16 percent said yes and 82 percent said no.

Climate change also ranked at the bottom of a list of policy priorities, behind the economy, health care, terrorism, immigration, and energy policy. (SEE ALSO: NBC’s Al Roker Thrilled By Online Poll Showing Climate Concern)

The lack of interest came even though 71 percent agreed that “climate change is happening.” Of those, 45 percent said it was caused “mostly by human activities.”

The survey was conducted Nov. 14-18 with 1,202 U.S. adults 18 and older from all 50 states, with a plus or minus 3.9 percent margin of sampling error.

Read rest at Washington Times

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024
Energy

30-Plus Signs That The Climate Scam Is Collapsing

Apr 09, 2025

Comments 11

  1. Gus says:
    7 years ago

    There is really no evidence at all of any “climate change” beyond its natural variability[1]. I wouldn’t worry about any of it at all, and I wouldn’t spend even one cent on any claimed “remedies.” People who throw tantrums over this issue are mostly scientifically illiterate and ideologically engaged ignorants, political demagogues, and the like. Not the kind of people who deserve respect.

    [1] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2018.10.020

  2. Dan Pangburn says:
    7 years ago

    Water vapor (TPW) has increased by twice the amount calculated from temperature increase of the liquid surface water. Both changed slope trend from uptrend to flat about 2002-2005. The flat was interrupted by the el Nino which peaked in Jan 2016. Both TPW and average global temperature are still in downtrend. Global Warming appears to be over.

    Is all that snow/rain just bad weather or is the TPW increase a factor?
    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DxYl0-fUcAALEW2.jpg

  3. Yonason says:
    7 years ago

    I seem to have posted this comment to another article somehow. Not sure how I managed that. Sorry.

    This if for this article:

    Not a penny to those scam artists!

    Humans can’t control the climate, we can only respond to it. The poorer we are made by their crooked schemes, the less we’ll be able to deal with any real emergency, if it arises.

  4. john from michigan says:
    7 years ago

    I wouldn’t give a nickel to give up US sovereignty to an international entity run by the United Nations, and that’s what “climate change” is all about. It has nothing to do with climate. It I all about redistributing American wealth and destroying capitalism (which is the source of America’s wealth). Anyone donating to fight “climate change” is being swindled. Their money is not going to where they think it is going.

  5. Squidly says:
    7 years ago

    Not only would I not contribute a single dime to “fight climate change” .. I demand these morons PAY ME every month for just suggesting the moronic absurdity of “fighting climate change”.

  6. Spurwing Plover says:
    7 years ago

    By their term Green Jobs dose that mean like working at some job for DiCaprio or Gore carrying and deliverying everything from Micro-chips to deck top computers on your bicycle? Bike Messengers when the way of the Pony Express and may cities banned Bicycle messengers after too many accidents and beside bike messengers were rude and wreckless and stupid

  7. Sonnyhill says:
    7 years ago

    AO-C’S “green jobs for all ” slogan gave me an idea. She could start a fashion craze by wearing green jeans. Her fans would create green jobs, buying green jeans and burning their blue jeans in public. The MSM media would give her even more free air time. GREEN JEANS FOR ALL, T-Shirts and hats, too.
    Then everyone would know who stood for what. Red Make America Great Again hats versus Green Jeans For All.
    Let’s rumble.

    • Graham McDonald says:
      7 years ago

      Need to get me a yellow vest…..

  8. Sonnyhill says:
    7 years ago

    Futures contracts for power delivered in New York state in 2021 are 30% higher than present rates. Why? NY is closing its coal-fired generators.
    Eventually, people decide to move to states where taxes and energy are reasonable. Texas is winning this contest. The warmer climate seems inconsequential. Huh…..

  9. David Lewis says:
    7 years ago

    If this data were presented on some talk shows, 57% would be willing to pay a dollar a month would be translated to “the majority of Americans are willing to pay to fight climate change.” The implication would be most Americans would be willing to pay a high price. It is obvious that the majority wouldn’t be willing to pay a 25 cent per gallon surcharge on gas either. Yet, a number of Democratic candidates are running with climate change as one of their main issues. You can bet that the programs they will be proposing will cost considerably more than ten dollars a month.

  10. Spurwing Plover says:
    7 years ago

    Lets see the Eco-Wackos and their celeberty supporters put their money where their mouths are and pay a little extra for those jet trips all over the globe and producing all that CO2 and hyporicy

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • africa river basinMedia Invokes Climate Bogeyman To Explain Africa’s Recurring Weather
    Feb 4, 2026
    Africa’s droughts and floods are recurring weather events, not proof of a climate shift, despite media claims to the contrary. […]
  • polar bears arcticBiologists Let Attenborough Push False Starvation Claims About Barents Sea Bears
    Feb 4, 2026
    A 2011 Frozen Planet episode warned of starving polar bears in the Barents Sea despite evidence they were healthy. […]
  • gavel earth lawsuitsState AGs Seek Investigation Of Alleged Climate Bias Influencing Federal Judges
    Feb 3, 2026
    Twenty-two state attorneys general urge the House to investigate alleged climate bias influencing federal judges. […]
  • computer screen modeling failureWhen Assumptions Replace Evidence In Climate Science
    Feb 3, 2026
    In its latest scientific manual for judges, the Federal Judicial Center promotes climate attribution methods over real-world testing. […]
  • mikie sherrillGreen Energy Policies Are Pushing NJ Electric Bills Into The Stratosphere
    Feb 3, 2026
    Green energy mandates and capacity shortfalls are driving NJ electric bills sharply higher, prompting an emergency response from the state’s new governor. […]
  • eu energy dogma‘Stupidity Of The Century’: Belgian PM Rips EU Green Energy Dogma
    Feb 3, 2026
    The Belgian prime minister calls EU green energy policy a costly failure, weakening reliability, affordability, and energy security. […]
  • jefferson memorial in winterMedia Promised ‘More Southern’ DC Winters—It’s Now Colder Than in 30 Years
    Feb 3, 2026
    ‘Climate change’ was supposed to make DC winters ‘more southern’—instead, it’s colder than it’s been in the past 30 years. […]
  • power lines nat gas plantPower Grid Watchdog Warns Wind And Solar Overreliance Raises Winter Blackout Risk
    Feb 3, 2026
    Grid watchdog warns winter blackouts are becoming more likely as electricity demand rises and coal and natural gas power plants retire. […]
  • highway 1 collapseClimate Change Isn’t Breaking Highway 1 – Nature And Bad Siting Are
    Feb 2, 2026
    Highway 1 damage reflects natural erosion and poor siting, not worsening storms or climate change, despite LA Times claims. […]
  • calif gas stationDespite Highest Pump Prices, California Lawmakers Float Mileage Tax
    Feb 2, 2026
    With pump prices among the nation’s highest, California lawmakers are considering a mileage-based tax to replace declining gas-tax revenue. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky