• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Plug In And Buckle Up? Why Electric Vehicles Aren’t Storming The Country

by Francis Menton
February 24, 2023, 12:16 PM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 5 mins read
A A
6

electric car charging stationIt seems like all the smart people have made up their minds that the future of automobiles belongs to electric vehicles.

In August 2022, California, by regulation, adopted a ban on gasoline-powered cars by 2035; and in September 2022, New York promptly followed with its own ban, also by regulation, and also set for 2035 [as did Massachusetts]. [emphasis, links added]

And at the federal level, in 2021 the Biden Administration ordered that all agencies move toward 100% procurement of electric vehicles, also by 2035.

Meanwhile, by means of a thicket of regulations — from vehicle mileage standards to pollution caps and more — the administration overtly seeks to force manufacturers to convert their lineups to EVs as fast as possible.

So, are electric vehicles about to sweep the country and become the dominant form of transportation? I bet against it.

This is just a specific instance of the general principle that it is always wise to bet against central planning of the economy.

EVs may be a successful niche product for a small number of wealthy consumers, but the idea that they will fully replace gasoline-powered cars in short order is the dream of central planners, who think they can implement their dream by coercion.

Central planning never works, and won’t work this time either. The reason is that the would-be central planners don’t know enough, and can’t ever know enough, to put together all the elements to make a fully functioning economic sector.

Mark Tapscott has an interesting piece today at PJ Media titled “Three Huge Reasons Why Electric Vehicles Will Never Dominate American Roads.”

Tapscott’s reasons are all good ones, which I would summarize as (1) despite vast government subsidies and rebates, EVs are still far more expensive than gasoline-powered cars, (2) even with greatly increased sales, the existing gasoline-powered cars will not go away and will still be on the road and the dominant vehicles in 2035 and even 2050, and (3) the increased amounts of necessary minerals for the batteries, from lithium to nickel to cobalt, are never going to materialize.

Key quote:

[All the] federal tax credits are available to help obscure the fact that EVs remain extremely costly for consumers and offer unproven maintenance and reliability records. No wonder that, despite the immense pressure being put upon consumers to buy EVs, they still only make up about seven percent of all new-vehicle purchases.

Let me generalize from that. The current automotive sector of the economy represents thousands of elements coming together via private markets to satisfy customer demand.

Each of the elements falls into place because someone perceives an opportunity to make money by providing that element.

As just one example, gas stations don’t exist because the government ordered them up, but because entrepreneurs perceived that they could make money by building the stations and buying the pumps, and making gasoline available at that location at a price that would cover all costs and allow for a profit.

Contrast that to what is now supposed to happen for electric vehicles. The government is allegedly going to be paying for some half a million charging stations around the country.

Maybe that’s happening, but I don’t notice any of them around where I live. And why does the government have to do this? If the demand were there, entrepreneurs would already be installing the stations.

It turns out that the stations are quite expensive to construct (at least the “fast charging” variety), and then you can’t really mark up the electricity that has to be purchased from the local utility. So it has to be done with government subsidy.

And in the next step, the same thing happens with the charging stations that happens with every other government-ordered business: the stations break down, and since no one makes more money to be sure they keep running, they don’t get fixed.

Among many, many articles on this subject, here is one from August 2022 at The Verge, with the headline “Electric vehicle owners are fed up with broken EV chargers and janky software.”

JD Power surveyed 11,554 electric vehicle and plug-in hybrid vehicle owners from January through June 2022 for its second annual Electric Vehicle Experience Public Charging Study. Despite big growth in the number of public EV chargers in the US, EV owners say the overall experience still sucks.

Well, check out the state of elevator operations or plumbing in the New York City Housing Authority projects. This is how socialism works.

Similarly, who has the incentive to be sure that there is sufficient electricity on the grid to recharge all the EVs when the owners want to charge them?

In the gas-car arena, oil companies make big money by finding and refining and delivering the product to the places where the customer wants to buy it.

Over in the EV arena, the same jurisdictions like New York and California that presume to order up an all-EV fleet also organize their grid on a central planning/regulated price model.

Reliable fossil fuel power plants are ordered to be closed, and replaced with intermittent wind and solar generation.

The all-knowing regulators then order that everything shall be electrified, and somewhere the little people are supposed to respond and make it happen, without any appropriate economic incentive. We shall see.

Inside EVs on January 18 reports that EVs had a big increase in sales and market share in the U.S. in 2022, going all the way to a 5.8% market share, after only a 3.1% share in 2021.

The article somehow omits mentioning how much of the sales increase was driven by the latest rounds of massive government subsidies.

I have no doubt that the 5.8% can increase somewhat further over the next few years, particularly as government subsidies turn into a gusher.

But ultimately a successful economic sector requires market incentives at all levels of the food chain.

EVs don’t have that, and they almost certainly never will — except in the highly unlikely event that consumers suddenly decide that the advantages of EVs are so great that they are willing to pay double and more for a car.

I’ll place a solid bet that market penetration of EVs will stall out at a low level well before 2035.

Read more at Manhattan Contrarian

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024
Energy

30-Plus Signs That The Climate Scam Is Collapsing

Apr 09, 2025

Comments 6

  1. Chino780 says:
    3 years ago

    The point is they don’t want anyone driving. So they try to phase out ICE vehicles and make it so expensive to purchase and charge an EV that only wealthy people can afford them and everyone else is left to ride public transport or work from home.

  2. Spurwing Plover says:
    3 years ago

    EV, are not reliable enough we cant allow for Bidens ignorance and politics to get in the way Replacing Gas/Service Stations with Recharge Stations is totally irresponsible and Biden is totally irresponsible and so are the leaders of the various Eco-Freak Groups

  3. Joseph Repas says:
    3 years ago

    Good point David Lewis..Batteries do not hold their charges as well as they get old. What would a used battery car be worth when compared to the new price? Not much I presume! Oh, that brings up another subject… Auto insurance..Rates going up because any significant collision will mean a totaled wreck? And how about surcharges to dispose of the toxic ingredients in the battery?hmmm.

  4. David Lewis says:
    3 years ago

    I find it amazing that so many people and agencies are assuming that electric vehicles will replace those powered by fossil fuels. The state of Washington is working on a plan to fund roads when gasoline taxes are no longer available assuming that most vehicles will be electric. Many auto makers are planning for such a time. However, it just can’t happen. Limitations of the electric grid and rare earth minerals are not the major factors. Financially there is a double hit that makes it impossible for electric vehicles to dominate the road ways. The first is they are more expensive and the price is rapidly increasing. In 2022 the average increased 13%. The second reason is due to the very high cost of replacing the battery, they are not viable on the used car market. The average family in the US can not afford a brand new gasoline powered car so we rely on used cars. The economics of the average American family is something that these central planners seem to be unable to understand.

  5. Spurwing Plover says:
    3 years ago

    So just when will all the worlds leader be using EV,s only and sail on Gretas little Sailboat?

  6. Colin Harkin says:
    3 years ago

    All of this is true.

    The big stopper for “battery” vehicles to ever reach a significant percentage of new vehicle sales will be materials. There will not be enough of those prescious metals that’s essential for the massive batteries that go into “battery” cars. Period.

    The second big stopper will be the grid. As we have seen, many states (and some countries) are changing to wind and solar while base-load generators are closing. This will lead to one outcome. There won’t be enough electricity for basic needs let alone thousand of “battery” vehicles needing to be charged. Period.

    Summary – Centalised planning of anything has never worked and never will.

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • COP30 fireGlobalist COP30 Climate Conference Bursts Into Flames In Brazil
    Nov 20, 2025
    A fire broke out in COP30’s Blue Zone pavilion in Brazil, forcing evacuations at the climate summit but causing no injuries. […]
  • Climate Alarmist Backlash And COP30 Declaration Show Cancel Culture Isn’t Over
    Nov 20, 2025
    Backlash against Pielke Jr at Cornell and the COP30 Information Integrity declaration show climate cancel culture is alive and kicking. […]
  • COP30 in BelemCOP30 Cash Grab: UN Demands Trillions For Climate Green Schemes
    Nov 20, 2025
    At COP30, the UN is demanding trillions in climate cash while promoting reparations, censorship, and indoctrination. […]
  • Paris Eiffel Tower climate accordParis Pact Fail: Climate Dogma Collides With Global Energy Reality
    Nov 20, 2025
    Ten years after the Paris Agreement, climate ideology is faltering as energy costs rise and nations rethink net zero policies. […]
  • electric meter ka-chingLabour’s Net Zero Levies Driving UK Energy Bills To New Highs
    Nov 20, 2025
    Labour’s net zero levies are set to push household energy bills higher, with green taxes and grid costs overtaking the price of gas. […]
  • LNG terminalFive Harsh Realities Shatter The ‘Climate Change’ Orthodoxy
    Nov 19, 2025
    Tech elites, China, energy costs, and real science all exposed the so-called climate orthodoxy as more dogma than truth. […]
  • Cargo ship portUnelected UN Bureaucrats Threaten Global Growth With Carbon Tax Push
    Nov 19, 2025
    Unaccountable United Nations officials are advocating global carbon taxes, risking global growth while ignoring economic reality. […]
  • Courthouse dark moneyDark-Money Network That’s Funding Climate Lawsuits Faces IRS Scrutiny
    Nov 19, 2025
    The dark-money network bankrolling many of the climate-liability lawsuits against energy companies is now facing an IRS complaint. […]
  • Tokyo nightlifeU.S. And Japan Break From Climate Paralysis With Hard-Nosed Energy Pact
    Nov 19, 2025
    A no-nonsense U.S.–Japan pact puts minerals, nuclear power, and real energy security ahead of the so-called climate crisis. […]
  • grocery store shoppingClimate Change Concern Plummets In Big Cities, Poll Finds
    Nov 18, 2025
    New poll shows urban Americans now rank inflation and housing costs above climate change as top concerns. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky