• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

NPR Thinks Opinion Polls Are Proof Of Climate Change. They’re Not

by Linnea Lueken
June 24, 2022, 8:30 AM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 5 mins read
A A
15
Share on FacebookShare on XwitterShare on Linkedin

severe weatherNational Public Radio (NPR) recently ran an article discussing the results of a poll it conducted claiming that Americans are suffering from extreme weather events due to climate change.

Although because of the mainstream media’s claims the public may be under the impression that every weather event is due to climate change, this impression is wrong.  [bold, links added]

Data demonstrate no trend of increasing extreme weather events, mainstream media assertions to the contrary.

The public, most of which does experience one or more instances of extreme weather each year, is being misled to believe climate change is making weather worse.

Polls are no replacement for facts in science, and science has measured little if any climate change impact on weather.

An NPR article titled “You’ve likely been affected by climate change. Your long-term finances might be, too,” written by NPR “Science Desk” reporter Rebecca Hersher, discusses the results of a recent poll conducted by NPR.

NPR sampled Americans’ views concerning their perception of weather events from the last five years.

“More than three-quarters of adults in the United States say they have experienced extreme weather in the last five years, including hurricanes, wildfires, floods, and heat waves, the survey found,” Hersher writes. “And most people who suffer major weather damage or financial problems do not receive money from the federal government.”

Setting aside the issue of how expensive weather damage to homes and businesses can be, which Climate Realism has previously explained cannot be blamed on climate change (here, here, and here, for example), the connection between incidences of extreme weather and climate change that NPR is trying to make lacks basic, measurable evidence.

It is not surprising at all that people living across a large country composed of many ecoregions experience a wide variety of weather conditions.

Every region experiences extreme weather at one time or another, and someplace, somewhere will most likely be experiencing some form of extreme weather at any given time.

Extreme weather events are common throughout all of history and are entirely natural in origin.

What is unusual are extended periods of extreme weather absences, like the record low in tornadoes in 2018, 2020, and 2021 as detailed by Climate Realism here.

Another example is the absence of strong hurricane landfalls from 2005 to 2017—nearly 12 years without a Category 3 or greater hurricane in the United States as seen in the figure below.

Figure: Number of continental United States landfalling hurricanes 1900–2019. Left, all hurricanes, right, major hurricanes (category 3 and above), with (insignificant) regression lines, (Klotzbach et al., 2018), with 2018–2020 updated from personal communication by Anthony Watts with lead authors.

NPR’s article also says that “[p]eople who experience extreme weather are also more likely to consider climate change a crisis or major problem.”

A group of people’s beliefs about the causes of a particular extreme weather event is not evidence of a causal connection, except in their own mind—in this case, an idea likely fostered by years of alarmist, inaccurate corporate media reports asserting that the two are linked.

What the poll does seem to be measuring is the unscientific impact of climate alarmist propaganda on Americans.

When every weather event is breathlessly blamed on climate change in the media, as Climate Realism constantly reports and refutes, is it any wonder?

Other polls that incorporate topics besides climate change show a less alarming picture. Americans consistently rank climate change as pretty low on the concern-totem-poll,  for example, see this recent Gallup survey about American environmental concerns discussed at Climate Realism here.

In that poll, drinking water pollution was ranked as Americans’ top concern, while climate change or global warming ranked dead last.

Continuing to beat the drum, NPR says:

“[t]he results underscore how ubiquitous and dangerous climate change is for Americans, as the hottest part of the year gets underway, and people across the country gird themselves for another year of severe hurricanes, floods, fires, and heat waves.”

Regarding heat waves, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s U.S. Climate Reference Network data do not show a trend of increasing maximum temperature anomalies, as seen in the figure below.

Even as the media reports on high temperatures in parts of the Midwest, the Northeast and Northwest coasts recently experienced unusually cold springs, as discussed at Climate Realism here and here.

Floods, fires, and hurricanes have not been getting more severe either. Data for these topics can be found in Climate at a Glance: Floods, U.S. Wildfires, and Hurricanes.

The American public may believe that their weather woes are caused by the nebulous specter of climate change, but that doesn’t mean they are correct.

Extreme weather is natural and should be expected and prepared for. NPR and the legacy media should be ashamed of themselves for pushing polling data as some kind of proof of the impact of climate change.

What they actually show is that their misleading coverage of weather is having a negative impact on Americans’ understanding of the natural world and the present known facts about climate change.

Read more at Climate Realism

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Skype
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky

Join our list

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.

We respect your privacy and take protecting it seriously

Related Posts

Energy

Report: Biden Likely Unaware Of Harmful Climate Policies His Admin Churned Out

May 28, 2025
Electric Vehicles (EVs)

GM Dumps EV Plan, Pours $888M Into V8 Engines After Biden Mandates Scrapped

May 28, 2025
News and Opinion

Predictive? Study Finds IPCC Climate Models Overstate Warming Up To 4.5°F

May 28, 2025

Comments 15

  1. David Boffey says:
    3 years ago

    Amongst other things, just like AGW deniers.
    They deny facts, science and observable reality, just like AGW deniers.
    They claim “the government”, media etc aren’t telling the truth, just like AGW deniers.

  2. Gumnut says:
    3 years ago

    They’re proof.
    Of the value of propaganda.

  3. Spurwing Plover says:
    3 years ago

    I want nothing to do with those Flat Earth Screwballs their just lucky to be living in a Country that allows them to beleive this Flat Earth Malarkey

    • David Boffey says:
      3 years ago

      Why not, they have the exact same belief system and character traits as you? Which country do they live in, birdy?

  4. David Boffey says:
    3 years ago

    Methinks that applies to you and others here more than anyone else as all you do is regurgitate propaganda and claim it is science.
    Just like your Flat Earth friends.

  5. Spurwing Plover says:
    3 years ago

    If she was alive today Tokyo Rose would be working for NPR

  6. David Boffey says:
    3 years ago

    https://www.rmets.org/news/interview-prof-liz-bentley-mail-about-increasing-intensity-hurricanes
    https://www.rmets.org/metmatters/2017-most-expensive-year-us-natural-disasters
    https://www.rmets.org/news/2020-track-be-one-three-warmest-years-record
    https://www.rmets.org/metmatters/seven-climate-change-hotspots
    https://www.rmets.org/metmatters/tornadoes-united-states-are-increasing-power

  7. David Boffey says:
    3 years ago

    “with 2018–2020 updated from personal communication by Anthony Watts” Watts? surely you jest.
    Also, why are you using data from AMetSoc? You claim they are all liars and fabricate dat. You can’t have it n=both ways, You either accept all or nothing, you can’t cherry pick and fudge.
    “Number of continental United States” what about the rest of North and Central America and the Caribbean? and this article is about others deceiving etc?
    https://journals.ametsoc.org/configurable/content/journals$002fwcas$002f3$002f4$002fwcas-d-11-00007_1.xml?t:ac=journals%24002fwcas%24002f3%24002f4%24002fwcas-d-11-00007_1.xml
    https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/31/20/jcli-d-17-0898.1.xml
    https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/bams/101/3/bams-d-18-0194.1.xml
    “When every weather event is breathlessly blamed on climate change in the media, ” More dishonesty. Contributing to something is not causing (breathlessly blamed) something, is it.

    • Drewski says:
      3 years ago

      Good luck getting through to this mob of morons David. To then, science is biased but oil company lackeys are the true experts.
      I have been on and off this site for 10 years and the only the names have changed but utter stupid remains. Although, the number of morons on this site has shrunk considerably so something has changed for the better.

      • David Boffey says:
        3 years ago

        Cheers. I first visited it many years ago but then lost interest. I decided to have another look to see how it had developed and found it had evolved from peddling “junk science” and blatant disinformation to pushing ill informed political rhetoric and blatant lies.
        I posted on Tony Heller’s site for a while, but as usual the gullible believed him even when it was proved he was manipulating data etc.

  8. David Boffey says:
    3 years ago

    “Data demonstrate no trend of increasing extreme weather events, mainstream media assertions to the contrary.”
    Citing yourself is not exactly a good idea when you are nothing more than political propaganda.

  9. Tagehe says:
    3 years ago

    What greater scientific proof is there but opinion?

    • David Boffey says:
      3 years ago

      This channel believes newspaper articles Are scientific Proof. They’re Not

  10. Shoki Kaneda says:
    3 years ago

    NPR is about as credible as Soviet-era Isvestia and Pravda.

  11. Spurwing Plover says:
    3 years ago

    NPR just more of the liberal leftists propaganda they call News No different then the rest of the Daily Fake News we get from the rest of the M.S. Media

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • Biden signs executive orderReport: Biden Likely Unaware Of Harmful Climate Policies His Admin Churned Out
    May 28, 2025
    Who’s really behind Biden’s energy agenda? Major executive orders reshaping U.S. policy were never publicly addressed by the president himself. […]
  • Biden visits GM EV plantGM Dumps EV Plan, Pours $888M Into V8 Engines After Biden Mandates Scrapped
    May 28, 2025
    GM pivots NY plant from EV parts to V8 engines as GOP, Trump EPA dismantle Biden’s electric vehicle push and California’s EV mandate. […]
  • earth sunrisePredictive? Study Finds IPCC Climate Models Overstate Warming Up To 4.5°F
    May 28, 2025
    New study finds IPCC climate models overstate warming nearly 4.5°F, with benchmark models proving far more accurate in long-term forecasts. […]
  • Government Accountability OfficeSenate GOP Accuses Govt Watchdog Of Trying To Save California EPA Waiver
    May 28, 2025
    Republicans are criticizing the GAO for showing bias and overstepping its bounds in trying to stop Congress from repealing California’s EPA waiver. […]
  • NYC traffic congestionFederal Judge Blocks Trump’s Bid To Kill NYC Congestion Toll
    May 28, 2025
    A federal judge blocked Trump’s bid to kill NYC’s congestion toll, preserving New York’s climate law and traffic-cutting program—for now. […]
  • Gavin Newsom PresserGavin Newsom Is Seething After Congress Repealed California’s Gas Car Ban
    May 27, 2025
    Gov. Newsom is steamed after Congress repealed a Biden EPA waiver letting California ban gas-powered cars and said he'll fight back. […]
  • Capitol Hill DCCongress Resurrects Fight Against The Climate Cult’s Regulatory Assault
    May 27, 2025
    Congress eyes bills to rein in climate overreach, challenge secret science, and expose hypocrisy fueling the elite-driven climate change narrative. […]
  • mosquitoNo, Climate Change Isn’t Behind Britain’s Mosquito Fears
    May 27, 2025
    The Guardian asserts that climate change will make the UK more hospitable to mosquito-borne diseases, ignoring established drivers. […]
  • wind turbine blades landfill‘Green’ Waste Piles Up As Solar Panels And Wind Turbines Pollute Landfills
    May 27, 2025
    Solar and wind waste is piling up with no clear plan for disposal, raising new questions about the cost of going green and the myth of net zero. […]
  • new orleans blackoutMISO Ignored Warnings Before Holiday Blackout Left Blue City In The Dark
    May 27, 2025
    Nearly 100,000 lost power in New Orleans after MISO cut the grid, raising alarm over blackout risk tied to green energy replacing coal and gas. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts by email either instantly or daily. Check your Junk folder for any verification emails upon subscribing.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books We Like

very convenient warming

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

Share via
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Climate Change Dispatch