National Public Radio (NPR) recently ran an article discussing the results of a poll it conducted claiming that Americans are suffering from extreme weather events due to climate change.
Although because of the mainstream media’s claims the public may be under the impression that every weather event is due to climate change, this impression is wrong. [bold, links added]
Data demonstrate no trend of increasing extreme weather events, mainstream media assertions to the contrary.
The public, most of which does experience one or more instances of extreme weather each year, is being misled to believe climate change is making weather worse.
Polls are no replacement for facts in science, and science has measured little if any climate change impact on weather.
An NPR article titled “You’ve likely been affected by climate change. Your long-term finances might be, too,” written by NPR “Science Desk” reporter Rebecca Hersher, discusses the results of a recent poll conducted by NPR.
NPR sampled Americans’ views concerning their perception of weather events from the last five years.
“More than three-quarters of adults in the United States say they have experienced extreme weather in the last five years, including hurricanes, wildfires, floods, and heat waves, the survey found,” Hersher writes. “And most people who suffer major weather damage or financial problems do not receive money from the federal government.”
Setting aside the issue of how expensive weather damage to homes and businesses can be, which Climate Realism has previously explained cannot be blamed on climate change (here, here, and here, for example), the connection between incidences of extreme weather and climate change that NPR is trying to make lacks basic, measurable evidence.
It is not surprising at all that people living across a large country composed of many ecoregions experience a wide variety of weather conditions.
Every region experiences extreme weather at one time or another, and someplace, somewhere will most likely be experiencing some form of extreme weather at any given time.
Extreme weather events are common throughout all of history and are entirely natural in origin.
What is unusual are extended periods of extreme weather absences, like the record low in tornadoes in 2018, 2020, and 2021 as detailed by Climate Realism here.
Another example is the absence of strong hurricane landfalls from 2005 to 2017—nearly 12 years without a Category 3 or greater hurricane in the United States as seen in the figure below.
NPR’s article also says that “[p]eople who experience extreme weather are also more likely to consider climate change a crisis or major problem.”
A group of people’s beliefs about the causes of a particular extreme weather event is not evidence of a causal connection, except in their own mind—in this case, an idea likely fostered by years of alarmist, inaccurate corporate media reports asserting that the two are linked.
What the poll does seem to be measuring is the unscientific impact of climate alarmist propaganda on Americans.
When every weather event is breathlessly blamed on climate change in the media, as Climate Realism constantly reports and refutes, is it any wonder?
Other polls that incorporate topics besides climate change show a less alarming picture. Americans consistently rank climate change as pretty low on the concern-totem-poll, for example, see this recent Gallup survey about American environmental concerns discussed at Climate Realism here.
In that poll, drinking water pollution was ranked as Americans’ top concern, while climate change or global warming ranked dead last.
Continuing to beat the drum, NPR says:
“[t]he results underscore how ubiquitous and dangerous climate change is for Americans, as the hottest part of the year gets underway, and people across the country gird themselves for another year of severe hurricanes, floods, fires, and heat waves.”
Regarding heat waves, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s U.S. Climate Reference Network data do not show a trend of increasing maximum temperature anomalies, as seen in the figure below.
Even as the media reports on high temperatures in parts of the Midwest, the Northeast and Northwest coasts recently experienced unusually cold springs, as discussed at Climate Realism here and here.
Floods, fires, and hurricanes have not been getting more severe either. Data for these topics can be found in Climate at a Glance: Floods, U.S. Wildfires, and Hurricanes.
The American public may believe that their weather woes are caused by the nebulous specter of climate change, but that doesn’t mean they are correct.
Extreme weather is natural and should be expected and prepared for. NPR and the legacy media should be ashamed of themselves for pushing polling data as some kind of proof of the impact of climate change.
What they actually show is that their misleading coverage of weather is having a negative impact on Americans’ understanding of the natural world and the present known facts about climate change.
Read more at Climate Realism
Amongst other things, just like AGW deniers.
They deny facts, science and observable reality, just like AGW deniers.
They claim “the government”, media etc aren’t telling the truth, just like AGW deniers.
They’re proof.
Of the value of propaganda.
I want nothing to do with those Flat Earth Screwballs their just lucky to be living in a Country that allows them to beleive this Flat Earth Malarkey
Why not, they have the exact same belief system and character traits as you? Which country do they live in, birdy?
Methinks that applies to you and others here more than anyone else as all you do is regurgitate propaganda and claim it is science.
Just like your Flat Earth friends.
If she was alive today Tokyo Rose would be working for NPR
https://www.rmets.org/news/interview-prof-liz-bentley-mail-about-increasing-intensity-hurricanes
https://www.rmets.org/metmatters/2017-most-expensive-year-us-natural-disasters
https://www.rmets.org/news/2020-track-be-one-three-warmest-years-record
https://www.rmets.org/metmatters/seven-climate-change-hotspots
https://www.rmets.org/metmatters/tornadoes-united-states-are-increasing-power
“with 2018–2020 updated from personal communication by Anthony Watts” Watts? surely you jest.
Also, why are you using data from AMetSoc? You claim they are all liars and fabricate dat. You can’t have it n=both ways, You either accept all or nothing, you can’t cherry pick and fudge.
“Number of continental United States” what about the rest of North and Central America and the Caribbean? and this article is about others deceiving etc?
https://journals.ametsoc.org/configurable/content/journals$002fwcas$002f3$002f4$002fwcas-d-11-00007_1.xml?t:ac=journals%24002fwcas%24002f3%24002f4%24002fwcas-d-11-00007_1.xml
https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/31/20/jcli-d-17-0898.1.xml
https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/bams/101/3/bams-d-18-0194.1.xml
“When every weather event is breathlessly blamed on climate change in the media, ” More dishonesty. Contributing to something is not causing (breathlessly blamed) something, is it.
Good luck getting through to this mob of morons David. To then, science is biased but oil company lackeys are the true experts.
I have been on and off this site for 10 years and the only the names have changed but utter stupid remains. Although, the number of morons on this site has shrunk considerably so something has changed for the better.
Cheers. I first visited it many years ago but then lost interest. I decided to have another look to see how it had developed and found it had evolved from peddling “junk science” and blatant disinformation to pushing ill informed political rhetoric and blatant lies.
I posted on Tony Heller’s site for a while, but as usual the gullible believed him even when it was proved he was manipulating data etc.
“Data demonstrate no trend of increasing extreme weather events, mainstream media assertions to the contrary.”
Citing yourself is not exactly a good idea when you are nothing more than political propaganda.
What greater scientific proof is there but opinion?
This channel believes newspaper articles Are scientific Proof. They’re Not
NPR is about as credible as Soviet-era Isvestia and Pravda.
NPR just more of the liberal leftists propaganda they call News No different then the rest of the Daily Fake News we get from the rest of the M.S. Media