Acting Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) chief Andrew Wheeler has put eight new members on the agency’s main board of external science advisers.
…snip…
“In a fair, open, and transparent fashion, EPA reviewed hundreds of qualified applicants nominated for this committee,” Wheeler said in a statement.
“Members who will be appointed or reappointed include experts from a wide variety of scientific disciplines who reflect the geographic diversity needed to represent all ten EPA regions.”
The EPA noted Wheeler kept on the board everyone who was eligible to remain, including many named by the Obama administration.
The new members include John Christy, an atmospheric science professor at the University of Alabama – Huntsville who is an outspoken climate skeptic and often cited by pundits and politicians opposing climate policies.
Christy’s work includes arguing that the climate is less sensitive to greenhouse gas emissions than the scientific consensus has found, including the United Nations’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. He argues, therefore, that human activity has a very small impact on the climate.
He told the House Science Committee in 2017 that the climate models that international bodies rely upon have failed in the past and shouldn’t be used to set policy.
“The average of the models is considered to be untruthful in representing the recent decades of climate variation and change, and thus would be inappropriate for use in predicting future changes in the climate or for related policy decisions,” he said.
CCD Editor’s Note: Prof John Christy will give a presentation in the House of Lords in London/UK on 8 May. If you are interested in attending the event, please email harry.wilkonson@thegwpf.org
Read more at The Hill
As well know by now the Democrats always choose to appoint some persons with connections with many of the Big Time Eco-Wacko groups Clinton and Obama always choose the big time Eco-Wackos
Climate Model skeptic. That’s a solid label. Unassailable.
Skeptic, Denier, etc are deliberately derogatory, used to discredit debaters.
How about Climate Optimist?