• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

New Study: North America Cooling Since 1998…No Significant Overall Warming Since 1982

by Kenneth Richard
March 15, 2019, 10:10 AM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
6

earth sun riseThe Post-1998 Hiatus Plods On…Regionally

North America (180-0°N, 15-60°N) has been characterized as a “major cooling center” by the authors of a new paper (Gan et al., 2019) published in Earth and Space Science.

The continent warmed from 1982-1998, but a cooling trend since 1998 has nearly wiped out all the previous warming.

Overall, there has been no significant temperature change in North America since 1982.

North-American-Hiatus-1982-to-2014-Gan-2019

The warming and cooling trends, especially the daily temperature minimum (Tmin), are well-correlated (r=0.71) with the path of the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO) during 1950-2014, leading the authors to conclude that the temperature trends over this 32-year period are “a result of” natural changes in the AMO.


Gan et al., 2019

The Key Role of Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation in Minimum Temperature Over North America During Global Warming Slowdown

Daily Minimum temperature (Tmin) is an important variable in both global and regional climate changes, and its variability can greatly affect the ecological system. In the early 21st century, warming slowdown is seen over the North Hemisphere and North America is one of the major cooling centers.

In this study, we found that Tmin experienced an obvious decline in North America during warming slowdown period.

Such Tmin decline is closely related to the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO), the correlation between the decadal components of Tmin and AMO reached 0.71 during 1950-2014.

According to composite analysis, the AMO on the positive (negative) phase takes two low-pressure (high-pressure) systems in the northeastern Pacific and the North Atlantic at night, accompanied by cyclonic (anticyclonic) circulations and warm (cold) advection in North America.

Therefore, the analyses conclude that the Tmin decline during warming slowdown period is a result of the synchronous decrease of the AMO. The results emphasize the key role of AMO on the decadal variation of Tmin in North America.

North America Hiatus 1982 to 2014

Image Source: Gan et al., 2019


Another new paper renews the global warming “hiatus” debate and documents a 21st-century cooling trend in northern China that also effectively snuffs out the previous decades of warming for the region.

Li et al., 2019

Satellite-based regional warming hiatus in China and its implication

Global warming ‘stalled’ or ‘paused’ for the period 1998–2012, as claimed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) (IPCC, 2013).

However, the early drafts of IPCC AR5 have no detailed explanation for this “hiatus” since 111 of 114 climate models in the CMIP5 earth system model did not verify this phenomenon. …

In 2017, after a wave of scientific publications and public debate, the climate models as reported in IPCC remain debates, including definitions of “hiatus” and datasets (Medhaug et al., 2017).

global warming pause Li And Zha paper

Image Source: Li et al., 2019

The slowdown in global warming since 1998, often termed the global warming hiatus. Reconciling the “hiatus” is a main focus in the 2013 climate change conference.

Accurately characterizing the spatiotemporal trends in surface air temperature (SAT) is helps to better understand the “hiatus” during the period. This article presents a satellite-based regional warming simulation to diagnose the “hiatus” for 2001–2015 in China.

Results show that the rapid warming is mainly in western and southern China, such as Yunnan (mean ± standard deviation: 0.39 ± 0.26 °C (10 yr)−1 ), Tibet (0.22 ± 0.25 °C (10 yr)−1), Taiwan (0.21 ± 0.25 °C (10 yr)−1), and Sichuan (0.19± 0.25 °C (10 yr)−1).

On the contrary, there is a cooling trend by 0.29 ± 0.26 °C (10 yr)−1 in northern China during the recent 15 yr, where a warming rate about 0.38 ± 0.11 °C (10 yr)−1 happened for 1960–2000. Overall, satellite simulation shows that the warming rate is reduced to −0.02 °C (10 yr)−1.

The changes in underlying surface, Earth’s orbit, solar radiation and atmospheric counter radiation (USEOSRACR) cause China’s temperature rise about 0.02 °C (10 yr)−1. A combination of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and other natural forcing (ONAT, predominately volcanic activity, and atmosphere and ocean circulation) explain another part of temperature trend by approximately −0.04 °C (10 yr)−1.

We conclude that there is a regional warming hiatus, a pause or a slowdown in China, and imply that GHGs-induced warming is suppressed by ONAT [other natural forcing] in the early 21st century.

No Warming China Li and Zha 2019

Image Source: Li et al., 2019

Read more at No Tricks Zone

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024
Energy

30-Plus Signs That The Climate Scam Is Collapsing

Apr 09, 2025

Comments 6

  1. David Lewis says:
    7 years ago

    So, how can the claim that 2015 of warmer than 2014, 2016 of warmer than 2015, and 2017 of warmer than 2016 be true if we have cooling. That is where NOAA comes in. If the data doesn’t support the climate change movement, then change it so that it does.

    I had an on line debate with a warmest who was claiming that the hiatus in cooling didn’t exist. I shut him down by pointing out that activists had come up with 64 excuses for the hiatus. If it didn’t exist why were so many environmentalist trying to explain it?

    • Sidneye of Vicheysprings says:
      7 years ago

      Yes changes are very apparent. There are increasingly number of sudden temperature shifts in any given season, Winter will now have several 60deg thaws within a context of 20 degree temperatures. Summer likewise extremes push warmer temps followed by colder and sudden storms. Rainfall is extreme, this is the first time in 60 years we have seen consistent and numerous gullies half a foot deep and a foot wide form from as little as a half hour downpour. Winter snows have become far more wet, typical inch of snow followed by sleet and then rain, consistently. Now a heavy dry snow is the exception. There are also sudden temp changes in april and may, frequent overnight frosts which have frozen blossoms and buds from trees and fruit trees.

  2. Steve says:
    7 years ago

    And clearly the cooling is caused by “Climate Change” from CO2 emissions as their models told them. It’s clear as mud!

  3. Amber says:
    7 years ago

    Cooling they say ? OK but cooling caused by global warming right ?
    It’s just not fair to screw with some peoples religion and big scary .
    Wait till the full effect of no sun spots take hold .
    The scam is in its death throes and these phony politicians can’t resist going to the scary global warming piggy bank one more time .
    This time they aren’t just targeting coal workers they plan on wiping out
    aviation , jobs and quality of life from fossil fuels , .
    In two weeks they have given the finger to :
    Jews
    Unions and non union workers
    Victims of illegal immigrant murders and rapists
    Border security
    the Deplorables … again
    NY economy
    Nancy Pelosi already looks exhausted from playing new Democrat wack a mole as the Trump hate continues to consume the old guard of the party .

  4. Sonnyhill says:
    7 years ago

    In a perfect world, people would give global warming /climate change a critical review. The “remedies” proposed to solve the “threat” are really a protection racket.
    Everyone should ask themselves these questions : Did you sense or notice any trend in the weather over the last 25 years? (climate)
    Has your perception been influenced by suggestion?
    Answer honestly.

    • David Lewis says:
      7 years ago

      Sonnyhill, we respond to the activists because they are loud and put themselves in people’s faces. They also have political influence way out of proportion to their numbers. I believe that most people have actually followed your suggestion. That is why survey’s have shown that climate change is near the bottom of the issues Americans are concerned about. In some cases, climate change is so low it doesn’t even listed in the survey results.

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • Newsom clean energy presserBlue States Backtrack On Green Agenda As Energy Costs And Reliability Bite
    Dec 8, 2025
    States are reversing aggressive green policies as energy costs, reliability, and failed climate lawsuits force a rethink. […]
  • desert sunFinancial Times Fuels Extreme Weather Panic In Arab Region, Misrepresents WMO Report
    Dec 8, 2025
    New WMO data undercut the scary claims, but Financial Times still pushed a narrative of rising Arab heat, drought, and floods. […]
  • Boulder scotusWhy SCOTUS Must Not Let Climate Lawfare Dictate U.S. Energy Policy
    Dec 8, 2025
    Boulder’s climate lawsuit gives the Supreme Court a chance to stop activists from using courts to impose national energy rules. […]
  • Petermann glacier aerial shotDefying Media Hype, Greenland’s Petermann Glacier Has Grown Over 18 Miles Since 2012
    Dec 8, 2025
    Despite media alarmism, Greenland’s Petermann Glacier has grown over 30 kilometers since 2012, with Arctic ice showing 15 years of stable trends. […]
  • dakota pipeline protestGreenpeace Asks Dutch Court To Overturn Multi-Million-Dollar American Verdict
    Dec 8, 2025
    Greenpeace is asking a Dutch court to overturn a multi-million-dollar U.S. verdict, using European law to block American court rulings. […]
  • polar bearPolar Bears Thriving As Arctic Sea Ice Expands, Data Shows
    Dec 8, 2025
    Healthy polar bears and fast-growing sea ice are reshaping the Arctic story this year, with real data showing stability instead of a death spiral. […]
  • protesters paint sculptureGreen Groups Falter As Trump 2.0 Leaves Climate Movement Scrambling To Regroup
    Dec 5, 2025
    Green groups face financial and strategic setbacks in Trump’s second term, but critics warn the climate movement is already planning its regroup. […]
  • climate emergency banner in empty roomFrom Apocalypse To Apathy: Climate Alarmism Loses Its Grip
    Dec 5, 2025
    The public and liberal voices are turning away from climate alarmism, questioning the need for drastic action. […]
  • ocean wavesNew Study: Rising Temps, Not Fossil Fuels, Drive Bulk Of CO2 Rise
    Dec 5, 2025
    New study shows rising temperatures, not fossil fuels, caused most of the increase in atmospheric CO2 since 1959. […]
  • offshore wind farmStudy Finds Offshore Wind Farms May Raise E. Coast Sea Surface Temps
    Dec 5, 2025
    Study suggests offshore wind farms may raise East Coast sea surface temps, challenging claims they carry little environmental cost. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky