• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

NASA’s Man-Made Adjustments Have Made 1910-2000 temperatures 53% warmer

by Kenneth Richard
March 19, 2018, 2:36 PM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 2 mins read
A A
9

 

Since 2008, overseers of the NASA GISS global temperature dataset have been busy utilizing cool-the-past-and-warm-the-present adjustment techniques to alter the slope of the overall warming trend.

For example, as the climate4you graph illustrates below (after the jump), there was a +0.45°C difference between the 1910 temperature anomaly and the 2000 temperature anomaly as of May 2008.

Image Source: climate4you.com

Today (March 2018), NASA GISS has tendentiously adjusted up the difference between 1910 and 2000 to +0.69°C, a 53% increase.

The +0.5°C Warming Between 1880-1950 Has Been Erased: 

Changes to past data consistently serve to cool down the past and warm up the present.

As recently as 1987, for example, NASA GISS reported a warming trend of +0.5°C between 1880 and 1950.

Pirazzoli, 1990:

Schneider, S. H. 1989 Science 243: 771-81.:

Today, the NASA GISS overseers have removed +0.5°C  from 1880 to 1950 trend and replaced it with a 70-year pause.  The 2018 NASA GISS graph depicts no change, a 0.0°C non-trend, between 1880 and 1950.

Image Source: NASA GISS

If NASA GISS temperature adjustments can maintain pace with the changes made in the last 10 years, perhaps a decade from now the temperature divergence between 1910 and 2000 will reach a monumental +1.0°C.

Or perhaps NASA GISS will discover there was a cooling trend of -0.3°C between 1880 to 1950 at some point in the next ten years.

We’ll just have to wait and see what temperature data changes NASA GISS will uncover for us next.

Read more at No Tricks Zone

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024
Energy

30-Plus Signs That The Climate Scam Is Collapsing

Apr 09, 2025

Comments 9

  1. Spurwing Plover says:
    8 years ago

    Our old homes outdoor tempature was always higher when the summer sun shined directly on it

  2. Amber says:
    8 years ago

    The Climate Gate E mails showed just how independent these “scientists ” are .
    Drink each others bath water or you might get pounded out .
    Did they ” homogenize” asphalt temperatures , jet engine burn off temperatures at end of runway and urban population growth ?
    I sincerely hope it is warming . Unfortunately kids still know what snow is .

    • jaypeemoron says:
      8 years ago

      Yes they did Amber and you should know this as it has also been explained 100 times before.
      If you want to know more, try referencing the Surface Station Project conducted by Anthony Watts of WUWT. He did a massive study on this very thing in the hopes of “putting the final nail in the global Warming hoax”. Turns out he simply reinforced the prevailing science. One curious thing though – the network of pristine stations NASA uses (rural stations) to calibrate against the entire network actually shows a sharper temperature rise. And nighttime temperatures are also rising faster — care to guess why?

      And LOL, Clamate Gate was investigated by no less than 10 official and unofficial organizations and newspapers.
      Conclusion? No scientific malfeasance.

  3. GP says:
    8 years ago

    “All explained literally a hundred times before.” And by some miracle, the adjustments just happen to help bring the temperature data more in line with the failed model predictions. Most scientists adjust their model when it fails, but climate alarmists are just special I guess.

  4. JayPeeMoron says:
    8 years ago

    JAXA, NOAA, NASA, BEST, UAH, RSS and HadCRU temperature readings are all remarkably consistent with one another making the concept of corrupt “fudging” of numbers by one organization impossible
    The adjustments (recalibrations) were necessary to homogonize historical readings that were done at different times of the day.
    All explained literally a hundred times before.

    • JayPee says:
      8 years ago

      DREWSKI

      You are a LIAR !

  5. Spurwing Plover says:
    8 years ago

    I can still remember watching their space luanches and it will be 50 years ago next year in July when they landed on the moon but since that crack=pot James Hansen was their Grand Exhaulted Poo Poo Head he has since made NASA into a political house of liberal idiots over this Global Warming/Climate Change poppycock

  6. G says:
    8 years ago

    As a child of the 60’s I grew up loving NASA, or should I say, I loved their mission. We put a man on the moon!

    Now their biggest mission seems to be that of supporting a left-wing, political, one-world socialist agenda with expensive and fraudulent data. Science be damned. …Shame.

  7. Amber says:
    8 years ago

    If NASA is prepared to lie about temperatures what are they hiding about the space program ?
    Isn’t the only reason NASA is even in the weather business
    because of satellite weather related activities ? Why would they be going back and recreating temperature data other than to fit a narrative . The climate models have been proven to grossly overstate warming unmaking the hyperventilated case for the earth has a fever . So NASA ‘s altered fudge data is supposed to be “scientific” proof ? Considering the $$Billions being blown of the scary global warming fraud it would be nice to know who exactly is cooking the data at NASA .

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • LNG terminalFive Harsh Realities Shatter The ‘Climate Change’ Orthodoxy
    Nov 19, 2025
    Tech elites, China, energy costs, and real science all exposed the so-called climate orthodoxy as more dogma than truth. […]
  • Cargo ship portUnelected UN Bureaucrats Threaten Global Growth With Carbon Tax Push
    Nov 19, 2025
    Unaccountable United Nations officials are advocating global carbon taxes, risking global growth while ignoring economic reality. […]
  • Courthouse dark moneyDark-Money Network That’s Funding Climate Lawsuits Faces IRS Scrutiny
    Nov 19, 2025
    The dark-money network bankrolling many of the climate-liability lawsuits against energy companies is now facing an IRS complaint. […]
  • Tokyo nightlifeU.S. And Japan Break From Climate Paralysis With Hard-Nosed Energy Pact
    Nov 19, 2025
    A no-nonsense U.S.–Japan pact puts minerals, nuclear power, and real energy security ahead of the so-called climate crisis. […]
  • grocery store shoppingClimate Change Concern Plummets In Big Cities, Poll Finds
    Nov 18, 2025
    New poll shows urban Americans now rank inflation and housing costs above climate change as top concerns. […]
  • Hansen Guardian 2015Hansen Got One Prediction Right — Ten Years On, The Paris Agreement Is Dead
    Nov 18, 2025
    Ten years after its big debut, the Paris Agreement looks like climate theater as emissions climb and reality catches up with the doomsters. […]
  • NYC icebergMeet The New Ice Age, Same As The Old Ice Age
    Nov 18, 2025
    Old ice age fears resurface amid climate panic, but history and data suggest collapse-driven catastrophes are wildly overstated. […]
  • London trapped in a new Ice AgeNice Try, NY Post — An Ice Age Won’t Come From a Collapsing Gulf Stream
    Nov 18, 2025
    AMOC collapse won’t trigger an ice age — the North Atlantic current has always fluctuated naturally. […]
  • obama cop21Ex-Obama Staffer With Climate Activist Ties Lands Key Energy Role In Trump Admin
    Nov 17, 2025
    Ex-Obama staffer with climate group ties holds federal energy post under Trump, raising questions about deep-state figures in government. […]
  • Palisades firePalisades Fire Fallout: Newsom Sidesteps Responsibility Again, Still Blaming Climate Change
    Nov 17, 2025
    Newsom sidesteps blame for the Palisades fire, pointing to so-called climate risks while residents and officials question his accountability. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky