As predictable as the morning sunrise, we are hearing that the spread of the Coronavirus is enhanced by “climate change.”
No proof of that for one, and secondly, it runs counter to the fact that life THRIVED in warmer times.
You have seen this chart many times so here it is again:
They are called optimums because life thrives more when it’s warmer. One may argue that a virus is a living organism, but the point is that in previous times if viruses thrived when it was warmer, plant and animal life, which includes humans, thrived more.
Over the years, after studying all this, I have made no secret that I believe the climate change agenda is a smokescreen for other agendas.
One of them is driven by the idea that there are too many people on the planet, using too much of the resources of the planet.
This apparently flies in the face of the “be fruitful and multiply,” which of course does not say be stupid and trash the planet, but then again does not imply that there is a set limit on what man can do with free will and a head turned toward a higher calling, something beyond the state.
But when I look at some of the statements by prominent people that are on the climate change bandwagon, I realize there is a link to population control.
And there is that word, control, the idea that one person knows better than another person what is good for the society as a whole.
Like it or not, Socialism/Marxism is not at all about equality for all but is a top-down form of government control where the vast majority of the people do not have a chance to rise into the upper echelon unless pledging loyalty to that doctrine.
In essence, the destruction of free will, which if you believe in God the way I do, runs counter to God’s gift of free will.
Basically it comes down to you can make the choice, vs someone else will make the choice for you
But where is the evidence for this, I think a few choice quotes will make my point
How about this from none other than Ted Turner.
Quote by Ted Turner: “A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.”
Now here are some really nice ones:
Quote by Paul Ehrlich, (former) professor, Stanford University: “A cancer is an uncontrolled multiplication of cells; the population explosion is an uncontrolled multiplication of people. We must shift our efforts from the treatment of the symptoms to the cutting out of the cancer.”
Quote by John Holdren, President Obama’s science czar: “There exists ample authority under which population growth could be regulated…It has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.”
Quote by Christopher Manes, a writer for Earth First! journal: “The extinction of the human species may not only be inevitable but a good thing.”
How about these:
Quote by David Foreman, co-founder of Earth First!: “My three main goals would be to reduce human population to about 100 million worldwide, destroy the industrial infrastructure and see wilderness, with its full complement of species, returning throughout the world.”
Quote by David Brower, a founder of the Sierra Club: “Childbearing should be a punishable crime against society unless the parents hold a government license. All potential parents should be required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing.”
Quote by Club of Rome: “…the resultant ideal sustainable population is hence more than 500 million people but less than one billion.”
Quote by Susan Blakemore, a UK Guardian science journalist: “For the planet’s sake, I hope we have bird flu or some other thing that will reduce the population because otherwise we’re doomed.”
A wish for the flu to reduce the population.
These are but a few choice ditties to make you aware that there is more than the increase of 1°C in the temperature of the planet, for whatever reason, than meets the eye.
An exhaustive list of quotes that will scare the daylights out of any rational ( keyword rational) human being can be found here.
I will end with the challenge I always do for people who have open minds and hearts. Don’t believe me, if it is important to go look for yourself.
Don’t believe what you are told. If it is important to you, you must do the research and come to your conclusion.
That is what freedom is all about. And believe me, given the nature of what we are seeing today, there may come a time when what you can look at will be out of your control
Remember the words of HL Mencken:
“The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed — and hence clamorous to be led to safety — by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary. … The urge to save humanity is almost always only a false face for the urge to rule it.”
Meteorologist Joe Bastardi is a pioneer in extreme weather and long-range forecasting. He is the author of “The Climate Chronicles: Inconvenient Revelations You Won’t Hear From Al Gore” (Amazon).
Read more at CFACT
Some liberal idiots are blaming the whole thing on Trump because most all liberals who work for some liberal news rag are total idiots
Swedish Arrhenius in the late 1800s pushed forward the concept of CO2 causing rising temperatures, since when it has become the backbone of AGW political theory. What is not told to us is that Arrhenius said this would be a good thing because it helped plants to grow, and also he encouraged wood fire burning as a possible means to warm up the atmosphere of cold Sweden. He then went on to be a leading board member of the Swedish State Institute for Race Biology, which aimed at “imrpovingrace character by selective breeding so that “inferior” peoples such as Lapps were eliminated. Sterilisation and abortion were encouraged. German Hans Gunther, the “Nazi Pope” was a prominent member. Nearly 70,000 people were sterilised. Greta Thunberg is a descendant of Arrhenius.
This article turned out to be about population levels. I will comment on the title and first paragraph about the coronavirus. After many years of following the climate change fraud I have noticed it is very common for the movement to make a claim with nothing to back it up, such as “the spread of the Coronavirus is enhanced by climate change.” If a climate realist challenges the statement, the burden of proof is on the realist and not the person making the wild claim.
It is only a matter of time before some junk scientist does a study that blames climate change for the coronavirus. It could go like this. The coronavirus comes from bats. Climate change has caused bats to have more contact with humans. This resulted in the jump of the virus from bats to humans. This could be done by never leaving a office and writing computer models. You can bet that the junk scientist would get grant money.
Stupidity and laziness (too lazy to learn anything) are the two major negative forces in our society. Away with the idiots first, meaning those who seek dominance over everybody else.
Do you notice one thing? Not a one of these people volunteer to show us the way by committing suicide! It’s clear that they think they are the chosen ones and the rest of us are expendable–the sooner the better.