• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Media Meltdown Over Trump’s Hurricane Dorian Tweets

by Brian C. Joondeph, M.D.
September 09, 2019, 9:33 AM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 5 mins read
A A
3

trump dorian sharpieIt seems that anything President Trump says or does can trigger the media into a state of stupidity or psychosis, or both.

The Trump-hating media has been suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder since November 2016, relapsing into insanity after each Trump tweet.

The latest trigger is Trump’s tweet about the potential course of Hurricane Dorian. On September 1, Trump sent this out to his Twitter followers.

In addition to Florida – South Carolina, North Carolina, Georgia, and Alabama, will most likely be hit (much) harder than anticipated. Looking like one of the largest hurricanes ever. Already category 5. BE CAREFUL! GOD BLESS EVERYONE!

It’s a typical Trump tweet with presidential well wishes ahead of a massive potential hurricane. It took only one word to send the media into a psychotic state. That word was Alabama, one of several states that could have been affected by the hurricane.

CNN, blissfully unconcerned that Joe Biden often doesn’t know where he is or who he was vice-president for, was outraged that Trump is “spreading false information during an emergency situation.”

This is even more of a national crisis to CNN than when they learned that the President gets two scoops of ice cream.

The media was quick to point out that Trump was wrong about mentioning Alabama in his tweet, attributing it to, “a fundamental misunderstanding of geography on the part of the President.”

This was a polite way of telling the President that he is a dope. Trump should just ignore it, right? That’s the wise counsel of the #NeverTrump nitwits but disconnected from Donald Trump’s punching back when wronged.

Trump has endured almost three years of nonstop negative media coverage during his presidency. From Russian collusion to his every tweet or utterance, media reporting has been well over 90 percent negative.

When once again accused by the media of being a rube or ignoramus, he hit back, calling the criticism of his hurricane tweet “phony.”

Not content to move on to the actual hurricane, CNN went into obsessive-compulsive mode, not letting go of the Alabama part of the story, believing they finally had the gotcha moment for invoking the 25th Amendment and sending Trump to the loony bin.

Was Trump right in his tweet? Did Alabama face a threat from the hurricane?

Here is the Dorian path map from August 30, clearly showing Alabama in the potential path of the hurricane. It wasn’t ground zero, but certainly in the storm path and facing danger along with the other states in Trump’s original tweet.

The map did not show the hurricane hitting North Carolina, which it did a week later. Trump also mentioned North Carolina in his tweet despite the above map showing otherwise. Why didn’t the media jump all over that warning?

CNN conveniently forgot their video from August 28 where they themselves told Alabama to “be on the lookout” for Hurricane Dorian. CNN went on to say,

“There are many states that are under threat right now. At least 6. From the Carolinas right through Georgia coastline into Florida certainly, and then also even into the Gulf of Mexico, Louisiana, Alabama, and Mississippi.”

I guess CNN also has “a fundamental misunderstanding of geography.”

Hurricane maps are predictions based on computer models, educated guesses at best. Interestingly the climate change doomsday scenarios constantly pushed by the left are based on similar computer models.

Of what benefit is it to President Trump to mention Alabama in his tweet unless the information at the time showed that Alabama was one of the states in the hurricane’s path? CNN makes it out to be some sinister plot on the part of the president.

It was the best information available at the time, nothing more complicated than that. Yet the media couldn’t give up and the story is now in its second week.

Next were the accusations of “doctored” weather maps. Trump presented a NOAA map that apparently had an altered course, a magic marker line added showing Alabama within the storm’s path.

Pining for the days of Watergate, the media was quick to label this as “Sharpie-gate” and they were giddy, believing they finally had the evidence to declare Trump insane, getting him impeached and removed from office.

I’m sure Jerry Nadler and Adam Schiff are ready to hold Congressional hearings over the weather maps that may or may not have been altered.

YouTube screengrab

CNN’s Jim Acosta, in his never-ending quest for relevancy, asserted that Trump “Jumped the Sharpie.” How clever.  Abilio “Jim” Acosta jumped the shark when he became CNN’s White House correspondent.

On September 2, the day after Trump’s tweet, the National Hurricane Center still included a small portion of Alabama in its wind map.

And why was this even a lingering story? Trump tweeted well wishes to states potentially in the hurricane’s path. The media accused him of being an idiot and Trump punched back as he is prone to do.

Now the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) was dragged into the nonstory for defending Trump’s statement that Hurricane Dorian threatened Alabama. Which it did at one time based on early forecasts.

Why couldn’t the media simply report on the hurricane, regardless of its eventual path? This is a fake news story created by the fake news media, looking to pick an unnecessary fight with the president. No wonder few Americans trust the media.

What was happening in Alabama during this time? Were they on the side of CNN or the President regarding the hurricane’s path?

Alabama was not reacting to the President’s September 1 tweet. Instead, they saw the forecasts Trump saw two days earlier. On August 30, the Alabama National Guard tweeted the following.

#HurricaneDorian is projected to reach southern Alabama by the early part of the week. We are watching closely and #ready to act. Are you?

Were they part of “Sharpie-gate”? Is this a grand conspiracy between the Alabama National Guard and the unhinged orange man in the White House? Or were these prudent precautions a president and state governors took ahead of a category 5 hurricane?

Trump knows history, and how President George W. Bush was excoriated after Hurricane Katrina, accused of flying over the damage, not caring about the destruction, becoming an albatross on the remainder of his presidency.

It makes sense for any subsequent president to be involved and erring on the side of caution when commenting about an impending hurricane. And this was no ordinary hurricane, either.

The Washington Post called it an “absolute monster.” And nothing Trump did could satisfy the media monster.

On the one hand, CNN criticized Trump for playing golf over Labor Day weekend ahead of the hurricane, ignoring the pending calamity, then, on the other hand, he was accused of creating unnecessary fear by mentioning Alabama possibly being in the path of the hurricane.

Welcome to Trump’s world where everything he says and does is by default wrong in the eyes of the media. No wonder he calls the fake news media “the enemy of the people” and pushes back against their buffoonery.

Read more at American Thinker

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024
Energy

30-Plus Signs That The Climate Scam Is Collapsing

Apr 09, 2025

Comments 3

  1. Amber says:
    6 years ago

    I think CNN should be cut some slack because they single handily put 10
    Greenocrat lame brains on display for seven hours for everyone to see .
    The “straw ” that broke the Democrats back .
    $Trillion dollar deficits , a mass invasion of illegal / criminal border jumpers , and the Greenocrats election platform wants to ban straws .
    Yep THANK YOU CNN ! The only one not hit by that poo sandwich is Steyer
    who can just not look nuts and he’s in .

  2. Sonnyhill says:
    6 years ago

    I drink my coffee watching the weather channel. There was one track, among many others, that predicted Dorian crossing Florida into the Gulf of Mexico. That track was an outlier, but it was there. Alabama was in line, according to that particular model.

  3. Spurwing Plover says:
    6 years ago

    CNN the Fake News Network once again proves why it can’t be trusted like the rest of the M.S. Media Wolf Blitzer is again making a total fool of himself along with the rest of CNN

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • stern looking judge with gavelJudge Blasts Oregon County Lawyers Over ‘Gob Smacking Failure’ Of Court Ethics
    Nov 3, 2025
    An Oregon judge says Multnomah County lawyers crossed the line in climate lawsuit after hiding ties to key evidence that they helped fund. […]
  • boardroom emptySnowball Effect: 900 Companies Ditch Global Climate Initiative, Demand Economic Realism
    Nov 3, 2025
    Nearly 900 companies abandon global climate targets while Bill Gates urges focus on human welfare over doomsday goals. […]
  • Thames River Frost FairThe ‘Climate Crisis’ of 1695
    Nov 3, 2025
    Centuries-old records reveal central England warmed 2°C in 40 years—twice the rate of modern warming. Activists would've called that a 'climate crisis'. […]
  • China rare earth miningUnlocking America’s Rare Earth Riches Could Finally Break China’s Grip On Minerals
    Nov 3, 2025
    Trillions in strategic minerals lie beneath U.S. soil, yet bureaucrats and activists keep them off-limits, giving China a metals monopoly on rare earths. […]
  • COP meetingWhite House To Skip COP30 As U.S. Pushes Back On Climate Doom
    Nov 3, 2025
    The Trump admin says it’s focusing on energy and jobs at home instead of attending another pointless U.N. climate summit in Brazil. […]
  • climate protestExplosive Report Reveals How 5 Foreign Charities Funneled Billions Into Extreme U.S. Climate Activism
    Oct 31, 2025
    A new report shows how a group of foreign 'charities' has spent almost $2 billion bankrolling policy fights and pushing an extreme climate agenda. […]
  • BYD electric vehicleCanada Easing Tariffs On Chinese EVs Could Shake Up The Auto Landscape
    Oct 31, 2025
    Chinese automakers may gain access to North American markets as U.S. carmakers face tougher export odds under Trump’s tariff strategy. […]
  • Calif desert wind farmCalPERS Clean Energy Fund Loses $330 Million, Taxpayers On The Hook
    Oct 31, 2025
    CalPERS lost $330M betting on clean energy, leaving taxpayers exposed as the state retirement system refuses to explain the losses. […]
  • Outdoor gas barbie BBQSydney Bans Gas Barbecues In Latest Push Toward ‘Net Zero’
    Oct 31, 2025
    Sydney’s net-zero crusade now extends to the backyard, with the city banning outdoor gas barbecues to save the planet. […]
  • EPA headquartersIf Govt Shutdown Continues, EPA Eyes Agency Furloughs And Climate Funding Cuts
    Oct 30, 2025
    With agency employees already furloughed and billions in climate-focused grants at risk, EPA head Lee Zeldin warns the agency could face even deeper cuts. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky