• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Media Turn Hurricane Dorian Coverage Into Frenzy Of Climate Hysteria

by Julia A. Seymour
September 06, 2019, 4:11 PM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
10
Share on FacebookShare on XwitterShare on Linkedin

cnn climate hurricanesAs the Bahamas reels from the death and destruction that Hurricane Dorian caused, the news media continue to exaggerate a connection between hurricanes to climate change.

Claims ranged from global warming making it “bigger, wetter — and more deadly,” to calling Dorian’s stall a “signal of climate change,” to insisting climate change is “worsening” hurricanes (without proof).

CNN, CNBC, The New York Times and other outlets, including agenda-driven publications like InsideClimate News and the left-wing Democracy Now!, all linked the latest hurricane to climate change.

Democratic socialist presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez also joined the fray calling Dorian “what climate change looks like.”

CNN’s Sept. 4, climate forum with Democratic presidential candidates was chock full of blaming climate change for the hurricane too.

The Guardian, which recently co-led an effort for more climate alarmism in the news with Columbia Journalism Review and The Nation, published an op-ed from climate scientists Michael Mann and Andrew Dessler.

Mann is famous (or perhaps infamous) for his “hockey stick” graph of global warming.

“Global heating made Hurricane Dorian bigger, wetter — and more deadly,” the alarmist headline proclaimed. Mann and Dessler also warned climate change would turn more places into “nightmarish hellscapes,” before admitting “the science has yet to come in” on how much it worsened Dorian or if it did.

In a fevered pitch, Mann and Dessler warned that “the worst part is this is only the beginning. Because unless we confront the climate crisis, warming will turn more and more of our fantastic landscapes, cities we call paradise and other dream destinations into nightmarish hellscapes.”

On Sept. 3, CNBC.com turned to Mann who claimed, “Human-caused climate change is visibly intensifying hurricanes and increasing the damage they are doing.” CNBC’s headline claimed Dorian was “a signal of climate change.”

Meanwhile, Dessler showed up in a Sept. 3 New York Times story that sought to answer the question: “How has climate change affected Hurricane Dorian?”

Dessler claimed there was a “very strong consensus” about increased rainfall of these storms. The Times also included other alarmist scientists arguing there is a “trend” in hurricanes stalling and that Dorian was what “we expect to see more often as a response to climate change.”

Professor Roger Pielke, Jr. of the University of Colorado called Dessler’s claim out in a Forbes column as “simply wrong.”

“Instead of referencing the assessments of the WMO, NOAA or USNCA the Times instead relied on a climate scientist who does not research hurricanes and who apparently invented a fictional consensus on rainfall and hurricanes,” Pielke wrote.

This was a serious charge, especially given that Pielke actually agrees that human-caused climate change is “real and poses significant risks.” He’s also argued for decarbonization.

However, he challenged the media to stop intentionally mixing up climate and weather for political reasons and criticized the selective inclusion scientists on the “bullish fringe” of consensus forecasts from government agencies.

The Spectator UK noted that NOAA’s Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory reviewed the research on global warming and hurricanes in August and said, “it is premature to conclude with high confidence that human activity – and particularly greenhouse warming – has already caused a detectable change in Atlantic hurricane activity.”

While those outlets were talking to plenty of alarmist climate scientists, they were ignoring voices like Dr. Roy Spencer, a meteorologist and principal research scientists at the University of Alabama-Huntsville.

Spencer told Fox News on Sept. 2,

“There [are] all kinds of statistics you can look at, Martha and the ones I look at are the long-term. Because that’s climate. Climate is long-term. And since 1900 out of all of the major hurricanes that have hit Florida there has been no long-term trend in either the intensity or in the number of major hurricanes.”

“Even if Dorian were to hit Florida as a Category 4, which it looks like now is not going to happen. There would still be no long-term trend,” Spencer continued.

When anchor Martha McCallum asked about the claim that sea surface temperatures Dorian moved through were warmer than normal, Spencer agreed the water has been warming. But still, he challenged the assertions being made about it.

Spencer concluded that: “If you look at the data going back over a hundred years you really can’t support increasing hurricane activity with the increasing sea surface temperatures we are seeing.”

He also told her that “The seven hurricanes since 1871, the seven hurricanes that went over the most unusually warm water for that time of year and then hit Florida — all of them occurred before 1950.”

Read more at NewsBusters

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky

Join our list

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.

We respect your privacy and take protecting it seriously

Related Posts

Energy

Biden EPA Awarded Billions To Dem-Led Groups With Little Oversight, Watchdog Group Finds

Jun 17, 2025
Agriculture

Media Pushes Climate Fears Over Arizona Wine, But Vineyards Keep Thriving

Jun 17, 2025
Energy

Net Zero Fantasies Collide With America’s Power-Hungry Reality

Jun 17, 2025

Comments 10

  1. Spurwing Plover says:
    6 years ago

    The Fake News Service CNN,CNBC,The NYT’s their LIARS LIARS LIARS RRAAWWKK SQUAWK SQUAWK KRRAAAWWW,SKREEE SKREET

  2. Sonnyhill says:
    6 years ago

    There was a time when you could place the latest newspaper beside anything and take a picture. It was proof of date. Today, you couldn’t trust that. Anything can be digitally altered, erased or created out of nothing.
    Weather records? In the wrong hands, they’ve been turned into lies.

  3. Amber says:
    6 years ago

    What the CNN Democrat info commercial showed was that “Climate Change ”
    has now morphed into a catch all for everything .
    Plastic (straws )
    Abortions (population control )
    Religion ..gala …none believers are sinners
    Womens rights
    Nationalized energy companies
    Essentially anything the hard left wants it to be . A convenient basket
    of shinny virtue signaling objects .
    If plastic straws are banned then using the same logic how can
    continued production of newspapers be allowed ? They result in the killing of millions of tree’s , they are disposable within 24 hours , they use poisonous chemicals that end up in land fills , and there is a viable non polluting alternative . Al Gores internet . God that man was a head of himself .
    Maybe that’s why the MSM print business claim to be eco warriors .
    They are distracting from their own criminal eco destruction . In fact they are worse than plastic straws they lie . Straws don’t .
    Wouldn’t it be very easy for President Trump to go after some of the real
    environment issues like lets say use the USA NAVY to chip away at that apparent big plastic ball the size of Texas floating around out there some where. At least plot it all and then send prison ships out to clean it up .
    Why not ban newspapers which are redundant today ?
    Pulp mills shut down , boiler plants , chemical reductions , delivery emissions.
    Makes as much sense as the straw crusade .

  4. Russell Johnson says:
    6 years ago

    On the business channels the question is being asked “how much difference will not using straws/going vegan/driving e-cars make in our climate”. Time after time the answer is almost zero. I have no desire to vote for anyone who promises to ban “fossil fuel”.
    Climate change as portrayed in our media is designed to make us feel victimized. At the core of this message is the thought “I’m a victim of severe weather/tornado/flood/hurricane/etc. something has to be done to stop climate change”. I reject that stupidity completely.

  5. JayPee says:
    6 years ago

    Remember the Ozone Hoax ?
    Well.

    What we’re going thru now is the last vestiges
    of the global warming HOAX

    Yes, as the planet becomes cooler
    and crop yields decline
    It will always be the fault of the
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

    as seen by JERKS who are at the
    UN and ALL of their ancillary puppets.

    We will survive this

    BUT

    It is entirely in every ones best interests
    if the UN and ALL their allied agencies
    were dissolved and abandoned.

    They were never anything but a monument to the
    stupidity of Roosevelt and Truman

    Just like the League of Nations was a monument
    to the stupidity of Woodrow Wilson.

    • Graham McDonald says:
      6 years ago

      Ah yes, President Truman. He sent one of his most trusted aides to San Francisco to pave the way for the creation of the United Nations. For some years it was believed that the aide was a Russian spy. The release of the “Verona Papers” in 1994 – decrypted soviet cablegrams – provided the proof that he was indeed a spy.

      So then you look at Truman’s March 21, 1947 Executive Order 9835 (the ‘Loyalty Order’) which somehow missed his aide. That order led directly to the House Committee on Un-American Activities – which so upset Hollywood, and to Senator McCarthy’s efforts to get communist sympathizers out of the US State Department.

      Was Truman ‘stupid’? Well, he did try to eliminate the Marine Corps, some to the Army and the rest to the Navy for on-board ship duties. And who were the only ‘ready to move’ troops he had available when North Korea invaded the South? I would use the word ‘ignorant’. His early political career at local levels didn’t really prepare him to think on a world scale…..

  6. anothermaninthemirror says:
    6 years ago

    Julia, thanks for this. Keep us in the loop. :0)

  7. Amber says:
    6 years ago

    I am getting the strong impression places like CNN are going down and hoping to take the economy with them .
    A seven hour soft ball game of would you eliminate straws questions with tones of tyranny thrown in . Yes nationalize the fossil fuel industry by all means .
    Over 50 million abortions per year but Bernie wants to dial that up in Africa .. you know humanly of course . After all that’s what they want. He seems to be clairvoyant about what African women need .
    Love his reaction to the baby crying in his audience . Has Bernie a bigger baby problem or is he just tired and grumpy running on empty ? Not a good look but at least it was real . If babies don’t like you chances are their MOM’s don’t either .
    I would love to see Bernie beat out the store manikin and the fake Indian if nothing else just better entertainment value .

  8. Spurwing Plover says:
    6 years ago

    More reasons you cant trust these lying liberal journalists since most of them are Democrats and Globalists

  9. Dave of Reedy Creek, Qld. Aust. says:
    6 years ago

    Any excuse to rant and rave will do. It’s hardly new for US and the surrounding areas to be pummelled by storms, hurricanes and tornadoes. Ranting is hardly thorough science but never let the truth get in the way of good story.

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • BidenBiden EPA Awarded Billions To Dem-Led Groups With Little Oversight, Watchdog Group Finds
    Jun 17, 2025
    EPA’s $20B Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund faces fraud and oversight concerns tied to Biden-era grants to politically connected green groups. […]
  • grapes vineyardMedia Pushes Climate Fears Over Arizona Wine, But Vineyards Keep Thriving
    Jun 17, 2025
    Arizona’s wine industry is thriving, not threatened, as data shows warming and CO2 have bolstered grape yields despite media-driven climate fears. […]
  • wind farm fieldsNet Zero Fantasies Collide With America’s Power-Hungry Reality
    Jun 17, 2025
    The net-zero transition is failing across America as states' renewable goals collapse under surging demand, fewer subsidies, and unreliable green energy. […]
  • Gov Jeff LandryLouisiana’s Gov. Landry Sides With Trial Lawyers Suing Energy Companies
    Jun 17, 2025
    Instead of defending the companies that power its economy, Louisiana’s GOP governor is backing lawsuits against them. […]
  • dumpster garbageTrash Is Now Racist: California Goes Woke On Waste Management
    Jun 16, 2025
    California’s war on landfills ramps up as regulators target trash for racism, emissions, and 'environmental justice.' […]
  • Trump really digs coalTrump Moves To End Biden’s War On Coal That Devastated U.S. Energy
    Jun 16, 2025
    Trump moves to end the EPA’s war on coal by repealing costly Obama- and Biden-era rules blocked by the Supreme Court. […]
  • NY power plant slated to become a 'renewable energy hub'.Media Cries ‘Climate Denial’ After EPA Reverses Unworkable Biden-Era Power Plant Rules
    Jun 16, 2025
    After EPA sought to repeal unachievable Biden-era power plant rules, media backlash followed — along with the usual climate spin. […]
  • President Trump arrives at Calgary International Airport, G7 Summit 2025G7 Ditches Climate And Gender Agenda As Trump Returns To World Stage
    Jun 16, 2025
    The G7 host nation Canada is sidelining climate and gender agendas, shifting its focus to core issues like trade, energy, and AI. […]
  • it's ot easy being greenDemocrats’ Massive Climate Agenda Loses Support With Most Americans
    Jun 13, 2025
    Democrats face growing backlash as many Americans reject Biden’s costly climate agenda and Trump rolls back key policies. […]
  • solar panel workerFour GOP Senators Call For Fewer Cuts To Biden’s Green New Scam
    Jun 13, 2025
    Four GOP senators break ranks, warn against full repeal of green energy subsidies in Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts by email either instantly or daily. Check your Junk folder for any verification emails upon subscribing.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books We Like

very convenient warming

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

Share via
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Climate Change Dispatch