• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Media Botch: Greenland Ice Loss Isn’t Catastrophic, Nor Increasing

by Anthony Watts
November 18, 2021, 10:06 AM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
4

movie floodingA number of media outlets have sounded false alarms over the past week claiming headlines like “Greenland’s Ice Sheet Is Melting So Fast That It’s Creating a Flood Warning for the World” and “Ice on the edge of survival: Warming is changing the Arctic.”

Dozens of media stories stem from a new research article published in the Journal Nature Communications on November 1.

One story, by USA Today, says “3.5 trillion tons of Greenland’s ice sheet melted from 2011 to 2020, which would be enough to flood all of New York City in 14,700 feet of water.”

However, this ludicrous claim is obviously make-believe, since as of this writing, New York City is still a dry and thriving city.

The research claims Greenland’s ice melt was 21% higher between 2011 and 2020 than over the preceding three decades, and from that, we are supposed to be alarmed.

While the 21% number may very well be true, the media conclusions from the number aren’t.

First, nine years of data do not a climate trend make, and as the World Meteorological Organization states, a thirty-year period is what defines any climate data set.

Trying to draw conclusions about “climate change” with only nine years of data simply doesn’t work, and is not proper scientific practice.

Second, the researchers have omitted what has happened in the last few years in Greenland, which is an indication of new growth in ice mass.

Currently, data illustrates that  Greenland ice mass balance change is at levels last seen in 2000, as you can see in Figure 1 below.

Figure 1. A plot of Greenland ice mass balance from 1986 to 2020. Graph originally from Die Kalt Sonne, using satellite data.

Greenland ice mass change bottomed out in 2012 and has been seeing less and less loss since then. Each year since 2012, ice mass loss has been declining.

With an upswing in ice gain, the days of ice mass loss are behind us, at least for now. Based on the current data, 2021 is expected to come in at just under 100 gigatonnes of ice loss, which is insignificant compared to the entire amount of ice in Greenland – more on that below.

Note that in 2017 and 2018, ice mass was actually added in Greenland. However, while the latest research can claim a 21% higher loss between 2011 and 2020, that doesn’t hold true over the entire dataset going back to 1986.

Third, the amount of ice being lost is minuscule compared to the total ice mass of Greenland, which is estimated to be approximately 2.4 million gigatonnes.

Let that number sink in because it is a staggeringly large amount of ice. Numerically that is 2,400,000,000,000,000 tonnes or two quadrillion four hundred trillion tonnes.

Now compare that huge number to the loss of 300 gigatonnes of ice in 2012, shown in Figure 1. Total Greenland ice loss each year is a nearly undetectable five one-thousandths of one percent (0.005 percent) of the entire Greenland ice mass.

As pointed out at Climate at A Glance, Greenland Ice Melt, when all of the data is used to graph Greenland’s ice, the result is insignificant, as shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2. (click to enlarge) comparison of satellite data for Greenland ice mass loss. Cumulative ice mass loss on the left, and that same data compared to the total mass of ice on the right. Data source: http://imbie.org. Graphs originally by Willis Eschenbach, adapted and annotated by Anthony Watts.

In essence, the purported “catastrophic” loss of ice in Greenland doesn’t even register on the scale of the graph at the right. When recent ice loss is compared to the full Greenland ice sheet, the loss is so small that it is almost undetectable.

And finally, sea-level measurements contradict media claims that Greenland ice loss threatens flooding.

NASA satellite instruments, with readings dating back to 1993, show global sea level rising at a pace of merely 1.2 inches per decade, which is not significantly different than the typical rate of sea-level rise since the mid-1800s.

Data shows the media narrative of an alleged, increasingly rapid ice melt in Greenland driven by “climate change” is not even remotely correct, and not even significant when the entire mass of ice is considered.

And, as a result, the fears of flooding due to ice melt are not just overblown, they are completely false.

Read more at Climate Realism

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024
Energy

30-Plus Signs That The Climate Scam Is Collapsing

Apr 09, 2025

Comments 4

  1. Spurwing Plover says:
    4 years ago

    The M.S. Media nothing but their usial leftists Lies and their Propaganda and USA Today is just another of their liberal rags there is also the NYT’s WP(Washington Post)Time,Newsweek,R

  2. Ken Irwin says:
    4 years ago

    On 23rd August 2020 – Sky News (UK) breathlessly announced a scientific study had found that enough ice had melted off the Greenland glacier in the last 12 months to cover the United Kingdom in 100m of ice.
    Holy crap ! Sounds serious. It isn’t and it’s absolute nonsense – totally fabricated.
    Why use England as a metric ? because it gives a nice alarmist soundbite via a nonsensical scale.
    Why not use Monaco and cover it with 474000 km of ice, 20% more than the distance to moon – or the Vatican 1203000 km – three times the distance to the moon. Both would be correct to the quoted metric and equally nonsensical.
    The following day they had produced a cute graphic of the UK (but not Eire ?) covered with a hefty layer of ice which was not to scale as 100m over a scale map of UK would look more like a dusting of snow – so they exaggerate (lie) using artistic license – however if you were to scale the graphic the ice is drawn 50-100km thick – please ! – give me a break.

    How to lie with statistics 101.

    Recalculate the 100m figure from U.K (Area 242.5×103 km2) vs the area of the world’s oceans (Area 361×106 km2) and you will find this claimed figure would have raised sea levels by 67mm – which it actually hasn’t done and that’s demonstrable – so they are simply caught out in a big fat lie – period.

    A 67mm sea level rise would cause the Earth to slow its rotation by 2.2 milliseconds whereas it only slowed by it’s natural rate (due to tidal forces etc.) of 15 microseconds – so if the news item was true, the Earth would have had to suddenly slow down by ±150 times its normal rate – this would have had the astronomers up in arms – maybe no one noticed ?

    Even the notorious tidal gauges – which can be tortured to confess most anything – couldn’t come up with more than 2.6mm-3.6mm for that period to all causes – not just Greenland.

    And it’s nonsense as Greenland has been melting around its edges – this due to warming oceans – which are 99.9% heated by solar activity and has absolutely nothing to do with CO2 – the warmer oceans give off more water vapor which leads to greater precipitation – which is actually increasing the total mass of the Greenland ice cap (but yes, it is melting at its periphery).

    The behavior of the Greenland ice cap is in fact conclusive proof that climate change is entirely natural – but the alarmists just simply lie and twist the facts to support their noble cause.

    A 2019 paper (Berben et al) shows that current ice extents are greater than they have been for the last 9500 years.

    https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9d01/7c43133eb7e028f19d429748de055c7542a0.pdf

    A 2021 paper shows that sea ice was at its lowest in the 1940’s.
    https://wattsupwiththat.com/2021/01/24/study-shows-arctic-sea-ice-reached-lowest-point-on-modern-record-in-the-1940s-not-today/
    Endless lies…………

    • Sonnyhill says:
      4 years ago

      “which can be tortured to confess most anything”. Thanks, Ken. You made my day.

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • Newsom at COP30White House Shreds Newsom Over ‘Disrespect’ Remark At COP30 Climate Summit
    Nov 13, 2025
    The Trump administration said Newsom’s COP30 trip was ‘embarrassing’ and mocked his climate stance as Californians face sky-high energy costs. […]
  • Frozen EU USAIcy Silence From Climate Doomers As Controversial Study Warns Of Possible Ice Age
    Nov 13, 2025
    A controversial study warns a collapsing Atlantic current could trigger a new ice age, though AMOC measurements show no ongoing slowdown. […]
  • free speech mouthAt COP30, UN Declares War On Free Speech To Silence Climate Dissent
    Nov 13, 2025
    At COP30, the UN is moving to stifle climate dissent through its Orwellian ‘Information Integrity’ push. […]
  • SCOTUS indoorsSCOTUS Urged To Weigh In On Boulder Climate Lawsuit As Ulterior Motives Unravel
    Nov 13, 2025
    The Supreme Court faces growing calls to review Boulder’s climate case amid revelations of hidden state-level policy goals like a carbon tax. […]
  • COP30 opening ceremonyPoll Shows Voters Skeptical Of COP30 Climate Talks In Brazil
    Nov 12, 2025
    Poll finds Americans largely skeptical of COP30, with major divides by age, party, and race on climate action. […]
  • Newsom cop30Newsom Flies 5,000+ Miles To Slam Trump Over ‘Dumb’ U.S. Climate Policy
    Nov 12, 2025
    At COP30 Brazil, Governor Gavin Newsom cast California as a climate leader while publicly and viciously trashing Trump's policies. […]
  • natural gas flamesAfter Years Of Pushing Costly Green Energy, The Grand Experiment Has Failed
    Nov 12, 2025
    New York approves a much-needed natural gas pipeline, highlighting the collapse of a decades-long bet on expensive renewables. […]
  • independent headlineMeteorologist Refutes The Independent’s Over-The-Top Weather Disaster Claims
    Nov 12, 2025
    A meteorologist says The Independent’s warnings about UK extreme weather don’t align with real data or historical analysis. […]
  • Prince William at COP30Absurdity Reigns At COP30 As Leaders Gaslight On Climate And Energy
    Nov 12, 2025
    Global elites preached ‘climate justice’ while demanding more cash and control, exposing the hypocrisy driving their energy agenda. […]
  • Gavin Newsom Sao PaoloNewsom Accuses Trump Of Giving Brazil The ‘Middle Finger’ With Tariffs, Skipping COP30
    Nov 11, 2025
    Newsom blasted Trump for slapping tariffs on Brazil over human rights abuses and skipping COP30, calling it a diplomatic ‘middle finger.’ […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky