Even before Hurricane Florence barreled into the North Carolina coast, a misleading claim about the storm and global warming echoed across the internet.
Florence made landfall in North Carolina as a Category 1 hurricane on Friday, but the day before, The New York Times published a video claiming the storm had formed in “unusually warm waters” in the Atlantic Ocean, heated up by man-made global warming.
In comparing Florence to last year’s Hurricane Harvey, the NYTimes’ reporter said “both of these hurricanes formed in unusually warm waters.” That’s false, according to Cato Institute atmospheric scientist Ryan Maue.
“Ocean surface temperatures along Florence track were abnormally cool for most of its life-cycle partly due to the unusual, higher latitude of the storm,” Maue tweeted on Tuesday night. “The integrated [sea surface temperature] track-based anomaly averaged from Sept 4-11 was 0.6°C below 1985-2017 ‘normal.’”
Florence formed in colder than normal waters in the eastern Atlantic Ocean. Florence also reached major hurricane strength (Category 3 or higher) in cooler waters, before heading into warmer waters where it didn’t do what weather forecasters expected — it weakened and fell apart.
In fact, what’s amazing is how strong the storm got and how long it stayed together over “marginal” ocean temperatures, Maue tweeted.
https://twitter.com/RyanMaue/status/1042184966875099136
The National Hurricane Center initially forecast Florence to hit land at Category 3 or 4 strength on the Saffir-Simpson scale, making it a major hurricane at landfall. Forecasters likely expected the warmer waters close to the U.S. coast to intensify the storm.
Instead, Florence weakened as it approached the Carolinas, despite the warmer waters close to the coast. Florence made landfall as a Category 1 hurricane, though the storm still brought heavy rainfall and flooding across the southeast.
However, NYTime’s video on Hurricane Florence ignored such data. Likewise, Pennsylvania State University climate scientist Michael Mann claimed warmer than normal water temperatures “supercharged” Florence.
Mann blamed an “ocean heat wave,” linking to a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) article published about one week before Florence made landfall.
However, the article Mann cited as evidence is referring to the warm coastal waters of New England and eastern Canada — hundreds of miles from Florence’s actual track.
But even the warmer waters near the U.S. coast were actually close to the 30-year average, Maue said.
https://twitter.com/RyanMaue/status/1042188142420402179
Read more at Daily Caller
3 things…
Global warming may indeed correlate to stronger hurricanes but historic hurricane records are too limited to draw such a conclusion. Plus, the limited forecast accuracy of todays hurricane modeling strongly implies that other factors than temperature play an equal or even more significant role in hurricane behavior.
But. Historic records of past natural cyclical periods of warming and cooling over thousands of years show NO correlate between atmospheric CO2 levels and temperature OTHER THAN CO2 levels lag behind (follow) temperature increase. Not the other way round.
“Man made global warming” is widely recognized for what it is…agenda driven politic-science. A LIE.
Daily ocean temps: https://www.seatemperature.org/
Hurricane birthplace Atlantic 75 to 95F. Assumed global temp rise @ ~1.4F
Assume for example 85F vs 1.4 = 1.6% Please explain how a close to statistically insignificant amount as above can increase hurricane intesities by 3 to 4x. Or as Hokey Sthick Mann says, tenfold.
Micheal Mann like AL Gore and Leonardo DiCaprio are all con-men selling their snake oil to the American Public