Eviscerating oil and gas production that affects power generation (leaving swathes of America suffering expected blackouts), food processing, manufacturing, trucking, and travel is proving to be engineered by a cabal of transnational asset managers and government administrators, starting at the White House. [bold, links added]
Supported by World Economic Forum (WEF) bandits, corporations are being squeezed to swallow ESG (environmental, social, and governance) protocols or suffer the consequences.
The trucking and fuel industries that power the economy are being coerced to severely limit their product and service availability.
Union Pacific, whose major stockholders are Blackrock and Vanguard, look to be criminally liable under the RICO Act for conspiring to restrict up to 30% supply of DEF (diesel exhaust fluid) and diesel distributed by Pilot/Flying J fuel stores.
The largest U.S. diesel retailer is being strongarmed by the railroad to follow orders and cut back the number of tanker cars or find itself without product as alternate delivery channels have been curtailed.
Another name for this scheme is extortion and chargeable under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act.
Racketeering is defined under 18 U.S. Code 1961 – “(1)“racketeering activity” means (A) any act or threat involving murder, kidnapping, gambling, arson, robbery, bribery, extortion, dealing in obscene matter, or dealing in a controlled substance or listed chemical (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act) …(B) any act which is indictable under any of the following provisions of title 18, United States Code: …section 1951 (relating to interference with commerce, robbery, or extortion)…” (emphasis, mine)
In the case of Biden, his administration is responsible for conspiring to gut energy production by restricting oil leases while lying about opening the bidding process, depleting the emergency oil reserves that further destabilize the American economy, canceling the Keystone XL pipeline, and accelerating shutdowns of coal and gas power plants, causing undue hardship.
The case could be made that the actions of the Biden administration are treasonous for collaborating with transnational corporations, foreign powers, and enemies to create economic havoc in the United States.
The WEF bears the same racketeering burden for international extortion, threatening oil and gas distribution in Europe and funding green political parties to force the EU and member parliaments into decommissioning coal and nuclear power plants.
These actions have bearing on American markets.
Labeling Greenhouse Gases As Poisonous
Investing heavily in electric vehicles they say they plan to power with wholly inadequate solar and wind farms that are harmful to the environment, influential asset managers are prepared to force economies into the “green” marketplace despite their dismal financial performance.
The current pressure on industries to decrease the supply of essential fuel for vehicles or the electrical grid (necessary to charge the eco-unfriendly and unaffordable EVs) or lose business is being applied by multinational investors buying controlling interests in vital supply chain providers.
The financial lever can be traced back to the labeling of greenhouse gases as poisonous that’s reflected in ordinances and statutes crossing every level of governance.
As in the Roe v. Wade ruling that created constitutional rights out of thin air, and stands likely to be reversed, Massachusetts v. EPA (2006) seemed to invent rights for the environment, asserting the enigmatic and indefinable entity be ‘protected’ from CO2 that was held by the court a pollutant and dangerous to the natural world.
The science relied upon to back SCOTUS’ opinion has been disproved, none of the predictions from “Climate Change: An Analysis of Some Key Questions,” published by the National Research Council in 2001, having occurred in expected timelines, or at all.
SCOTUS said, “The harms associated with climate change are serious and well recognized.”
This statement by the court is, truthfully, the opposite of what has been proven, especially now, 16 years following the ruling where cumulative statistics have shown the opinion to be based on fallacious ‘facts.’
One major driving assumption quoted in Mass v. EPA that has since been found incorrect: the NRC report “concluded that “[g]reenhouse gases are accumulating in Earth’s atmosphere as a result of human activities, causing surface air temperatures and subsurface ocean temperatures to rise. Temperatures are, in fact, rising.”
None of the foregoing has been borne out.
Environmental Justice: A Nonsensical Concept.
The NRC report and those before and since released by the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) promote a political ideology that mankind is injuring itself along with non-sentient flora, fauna, and landforms that can’t speak for themselves.
This is what underlies “environmental justice,” a nonsensical concept.
Extortion and interference with commerce – the main concern that motivated the fight for independence from King George III: to protect commerce, domestically and on the high seas – is central to building a RICO case against Blackrock, Vanguard, and other financial organs including WEF membership, and President Joe Biden and his Administration, all of whom have conspired in economic terrorism.
To enter a further debate about Biden (copying an Obama apparatus) applying climate change speculation that relates to adjudicated definitions rather than scientific proof, states may be missing an essential point in their argument against greenhouse gas regulations that come under the heading of extortion.
“Interagency Working Group on the Social Cost of Greenhouse Gases,” wielding executive oversight of emission standards by attempting to estimate costs to mitigate GHGs effect on the environment, which is an unknown and unmeasurable, is based on a fiction promulgated by the Supreme Court, as mentioned above and below.
Justice Antonin Scalia dissented in the Mass v. EPA case with a closing argument that included this nugget of common sense: “[T]he term ‘air pollution’ as used in the regulatory provisions cannot be interpreted to encompass global climate change.”
Yet this climate change ploy that industry is aggressive toward the “environment” is being monetized to shakedown every human engaged in commerce.
Scientific Conjecture Is Not Scientific Proof
Since the polluting properties of “greenhouse gases” was enshrined by jurists dependent on scientific conjecture and not scientific proof, it may be challenged and overturned, or in the case of states following their constitution and the 9th and 10th Amendments, ought to be set aside as violating the people’s constitutional rights.
Because [greenhouse gas] emission standards are instituted by federal agencies (legislation enabling such designations is open-ended and vague, which underlaid the Mass v. EPA case), it will mean reversing and repealing ideological statutes and ordinances that empower agencies to extort funds (taxes and penalties) and interfere with commerce (blocking oil and gas leases).
What can’t be proven in court is irrefutable science allowing for the categorization of elements as so-called greenhouse gases or for their grouped classification as poisonous or toxic.
Whereas, gases such as CO2 can be proven to be essential to life on earth, which these agencies assert is being harmed by these same gases.
Climate change, previously called global cooling or warming, is the apparatus, the fiction by which government, financial institutions, and investors are extorting, bankrupting, and terrorizing businesses and citizens.
The health of the environment or the planet as a whole is not a credible victim.
It is a fabricated entity that has no standing as an injured party except in the minds of seriously twisted attorneys, politicians, megalomaniacs, and psychotic eco-warriors.
h/t Alan S.
Read more at CFP
