• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

In 2019, Biden Said He’d Fight Climate Change By Jailing Oil Execs

by Haris Alic
October 29, 2020, 1:24 PM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
9

biden nhFormer Vice President Joe Biden suggested last year that, if elected, his administration would seek to fight climate change by any possible measure, including jailing fossil fuel executives for excessive pollution.

Biden, who is under fire for his position on fracking in the closing days of the presidential contest, made the comments during a campaign swing through New Hampshire in 2019 ahead of the state’s first in the nation primary.

During an event with supporters in Peterborough, the former vice president was asked about what the consequences to America would be if the country did not stop using fossil fuels in the future–to which Biden responded, “we’re all dead.”

“We have to set sort of guide rails down now, so between the years 2021 and 2030, it’s irreversible, the path we set ourselves on. And one of which is doing away with any substance for fossil fuels – number one,” Biden said during the event.

“Number two, holding them liable for what they have done,” the former vice president said of fossil fuel executives, “particularly in those cases where your underserved neighborhoods and – you know the deal, okay. And by the way, when they don’t want to deliver, put them in jail. I’m not joking about this.”

.@JoeBiden on fossil fuel execs: “We should put them in jail” for pollution pic.twitter.com/OLqZMwi4E5

— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) December 29, 2019

Biden’s comments from 2019 come back into the spotlight as the Democrat nominee is facing criticism from Republicans and voters, alike, over his shifting stance on fracking.

During the final presidential debate of the general election earlier this month, the former vice president asserted that he did not support a ban on fracking, but did admit that the United States would have to transition from oil at some point in the near future.

The remarks quickly were seized upon by Republicans, who claim that the Democrat nominee’s position on energy is in line with more progressive elements of his party, which favor banning fracking and programs like the Green New Deal.

Despite Biden’s assertion on fracking, the former vice president’s climate change proposal states that, if elected, his administration would adopt a 100 percent clean-electricity standard by 2035. A similar idea was initially raised by Gov. Jay Inslee (D-WA) last year during his own ill-fated run for the Democrat nomination.

If implemented, it would ensure that all electricity produced in the United States would be “carbon-free.”

This would likely have a massive impact on the coal and natural gas industries that, according to the Energy Information Association, produce around 63 percent of all electricity in the country.

Biden’s climate change plan also calls for the creation of a new division within the Department of Justice to combat pollution and advance “environmental and climate justice.”

The division will be responsible for cracking down on the businesses and corporations, including their executives, that contribute to pollution.

It will be empowered to pursue pollution “cases to the fullest extent permitted by law and, when needed, seek additional legislation to hold corporate executives personally accountable–including jail time [when] merited.”

Read more at Breitbart

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024
Energy

30-Plus Signs That The Climate Scam Is Collapsing

Apr 09, 2025

Comments 9

  1. Graham McDonald says:
    5 years ago

    “Number two, holding them liable for what they have done,” the former vice president said of fossil fuel executives, “particularly in those cases where your underserved neighborhoods and – you know the deal, okay. And by the way, when they don’t want to deliver, put them in jail. I’m not joking about this.”

    “… when they don’t want to deliver…”

    Sounds like he’s making a reference to a situation in New York State a bit over a year ago. A natural gas utility had applied for a new pipeline. It was denied. They then refused to take on any new customers – “Our existing pipeline cannot deliver enough gas to supply new customers.”

    Governor Cuomo stepped in – “You will supply gas to new customers”.

    The utility did so – by bringing in gas in tanker trucks. So much for “Green”.

  2. Coeur de Lion says:
    5 years ago

    Bring it on! Bring it on! The defence would expose the alarmist lunacies. The trial must be held in a northern USA court with the heating turned off.

    • Spurwing Plover says:
      5 years ago

      A trial by the Back to Nature Freaks from Greenpeace,Friends of t ehe Earth,Sierra Club Etc and lead by Robert Kennedy Jr as the Chief Prosicuter

  3. David Lewis says:
    5 years ago

    Putting people in jail for activities that are perfectly legal has been the mode of operation of Nazi and Communist governments. I think this is the sort of thing we can expect from Biden. Yet, people who have committed real crimes in the climate change issue are immuned. I’m thinking of the people who while on the government payroll fraudulently altered historical climate data to support the cause.

    Randy, they have good reason to stir up emotion. If someone comes to a conclusion based on emotion they will not change their mind when present with facts.

    • Randy Verret says:
      5 years ago

      David, I certainly understand how emotion clouds any reasonable analysis or discerning judgment. I was involved in public affairs since the early 80″s with the domestic oil industry and I witnessed with my own eyes the increasing rise of “fanaticism” at public meetings & hearings. I also saw over the past 20 years the evolution of the Environmental NGO’s from (primarily) conservation focused organizations to pure ZEALOTS that have no capacity to see anything POSITIVE about oil & gas, outside of outright ERADICATION of the industry. Where all this “implodes” is they have no constructive alternative to REPLACE 65% of our domestic primary energy. Basically, the “Biden Energy Plan” and as it “morphs” into the Green New Deal is your proverbial high wire act WITHOUT a net. GLAD I’m retired from the oil & gas industry. Dealing with fanatics gets EXHAUSTING…

  4. Spurwing Plover says:
    5 years ago

    And i would take all the leaders of the various Eco-Freak Groups and maroon them on a Island for a month or two without any Parazzii

  5. Ralph says:
    5 years ago

    Biden’s really pandering for the greenie vote.

  6. Randy Verret says:
    5 years ago

    Forgot to mention. Seems like these days, if you want to get traction in the media & stir up negative emotion & promote division, your blanket defaults seem to be “impacts on underserved communities,” “social &/or environmental justice” and “environmental racism.” Instead of promoting a thoughtful, well informed and sensible debate on the energy transition, many seem to resort to what appears as the lowest common denominator. What a terrible disservice to our country…

  7. Randy Verret says:
    5 years ago

    Since when did responsible development of oil & gas resources become jail worthy? Extraction & production of oil & gas is a long promoted LEGAL activity fully sanctioned at the federal, State & (often) local levels of government. There are a BUNCH of federal environmental laws and attendant regulation, not to mention State oil & gas regulatory agencies that have long standing operational & environmental requirements that strictly govern O & G operations. This well established & existing regulatory framework contains considerable civil & criminal penalties for non-compliance & reckless conduct, especially on environmental pollution matters. As a former industry regulatory professional, I was (also) subject to a signed Code of Conduct where my own company could pursue litigation against ME personally for willful misconduct in performance of my duties. So, what the hell is this all about? Jail oil executives for what…providing energy & useful products that form the foundation for every American’s modern way of life? One other key question. If all oil & gas is TAINTED, then is the federal government going to “fess up” to their role in the conspiracy and all the DIRTY bonus & royalty money in the (now) several TRILLIONS of dollars they have collected over the past 80-90 years? How ridiculous can you get…

Stay Connected!

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Get notified when new posts are published!

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Recent Posts

  • noreasterAre The Strongest Nor’easters Getting Stronger? What The Data Actually Shows
    Feb 24, 2026
    A climate expert dissects a nor’easter intensification study, showing how scientific uncertainty morphed into media certainty. […]
  • wind farm constructionThe Regulatory Machine Pushing Up America’s Electricity Prices
    Feb 24, 2026
    Decades of environmental rules, misguided regulations, and green mandates shifted risk to ratepayers — locking in rising electricity prices. […]
  • supreme court buildingSCOTUS To Hear Climate Lawsuit That Could Cost Consumers Billions
    Feb 24, 2026
    The Supreme Court will decide whether state courts can impose climate damages on oil companies, a ruling that could affect consumers nationwide. […]
  • electric car house fireElectric Car Fire In Germany Renews Safety Concerns Over EV Battery Risks
    Feb 24, 2026
    A charging station blaze in Schwaigern reignites debate over ferry bans, parking garage restrictions, and lithium-ion battery fire risks. […]
  • nyt EF headlineNYT Cries ‘End Of Science’ After Trump EPA Scraps Obama-Era Endangerment Finding
    Feb 23, 2026
    NYT claims Trump erased government climate authority after EPA scraps Obama-era endangerment finding critics say lacked legal and scientific basis. […]
  • HawaiiActual Honolulu Tide Gauge Data Undercuts Disastrous Sea Level Rise Claims
    Feb 23, 2026
    Honolulu tide gauge data show modest sea level rise, undercutting catastrophic claims built on global satellite averages and public perception. […]
  • supreme court protestClimate Alarmists Howl After EPA Rescinds ‘Endangerment Finding’
    Feb 23, 2026
    EPA rescinds the 2009 Endangerment Finding, prompting immediate lawsuits and fierce backlash from climate activists. […]
  • burning moneyThe $16 Trillion Climate Tab — And The Poor Got Left In The Dark
    Feb 20, 2026
    Bjorn Lomborg says $16 trillion in climate spending delivered no measurable results while energy poverty and preventable deaths persisted. […]
  • school bus yellowEPA Moves To Overhaul Biden-Era Clean School Bus Program After Safety Failures
    Feb 20, 2026
    EPA seeks reforms to Biden-era Clean School Bus Program after electric buses bought with tax dollars proved unreliable and unsafe. […]
  • india coal miningIndia Doubles Down On Coal And Natural Gas As Climate Goals Recede
    Feb 20, 2026
    India expands coal power and deepens U.S. LNG trade while pushing net-zero to 2070, signaling where global energy policy is really headed. […]

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

Climate prn book

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky